Abstract
Social media like Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ have become important communication channels. Nonetheless, the distribution and dynamics of that communication make it difficult to analyze and understand. To overcome this, we propose an agent architecture for modeling and simulating user behavior to analyze communication dynamics in social media. Our agent decision-making method utilizes sociological actor types to represent motivations of media users and their impact on communicative behavior. We apply this concept to a simulation of real world Twitter communication accompanying a German television program. Our evaluation shows that the agent architecture is capable of simulating communication dynamics in human media usage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balke, T., Gilbert, N.: How do agents make decisions? a survey. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(4), 13 (2014)
Belkaroui, R., Faiz, R., Elkhlifi, A.: Conversation analysis on social networking sites. In: 2014 Tenth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), pp. 172–178. IEEE (2014)
Berger, C.R.: Interpersonal communication. The International Encyclopedia of Communication (2008)
Berndt, J.O., Herzog, O.: Anticipatory behavior of software agents in self-organizing negotiations. In: Nadin, M. (ed.) Anticipation Across Disciplines. CSM, vol. 29, pp. 231–253. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22599-9_15
Berndt, J.O., Rodermund, S.C., Lorig, F., Timm, I.J.: Modeling user behavior in social media with complex agents. In: Third International Conference on Human and Social Analytics (HUSO 2017). IARIA (2017, to appear)
Bollen, J., Mao, H., Pepe, A.: Modeling public mood and emotion: twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. In: 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 450–453 (2011)
Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(3), 7280–7287 (2002)
Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2010)
Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Chen, W., Wang, Y., Yang, S.: Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In: 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 199–208. ACM (2009)
Davidsson, P.: Agent based social simulation: a computer science view. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(1) (2002)
Dittrich, P., Kron, T.: Complex reflexive agents as models of social actors. In: Proceedings of the SICE Workshop on Artificial Society/Organization/Economy, Meeting of Systems Engineering, Tokyo, vol. 25, pp. 79–88, (2002)
Fischer, K., Florian, M., Malsch, T.: Socionics: Scalability of Complex Social Systems. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Flam, H.: Emotional ‘man’: I. the emotionalman’and the problem of collective action. Int. Sociol. 5(1), 39–56 (1990)
Hedström, P., Ylikoski, P.: Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 49–67 (2010)
Hoste, V., Van Hee, C., Poels, K.: Towards a framework for the automatic detection of crisis emotions on social media: a corpus analysis of the tweets posted after the crash of germanwings flight 9525. In: 2nd International Conference on Human and Social Analytics (HUSO 2016), pp. 29–32 (2016)
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, pp. 56–65. ACM (2007)
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J.M., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Theory Comput. 11(4), 105–147 (2015)
Kirby, J.: Connected Marketing: The Viral, Buzz and Word of Mouth Revolution. Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam (2010)
Lerman, K., Ghosh, R.: Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. ICWSM 10, 90–97 (2010)
Lorig, F., Timm, I.J.: How to model the human factor for agent-based simulation in social media analysis? In: 2014 ADS Symposium (Part of SpringSim Multiconference), p. 12. SCS (2014)
Luhmann, N.: Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1995)
Maireder, A., Schlögl, S.: 24 hours of an# outcry: the networked publics of a socio-political debate. Eur. J. Commun. 29(6), 1–16 (2014)
Monica, S., Bergenti, F.: An analytic study of opinion dynamics in multi-agent systems with additive random noise. In: Adorni, G., Cagnoni, S., Gori, M., Maratea, M. (eds.) AI*IA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10037, pp. 105–117. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49130-1_9
Monica, S., Bergenti, F.: Opinion dynamics in multi-agent systems: selected analytic models and verifying simulations. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 23(87), 1–28 (2016)
Neuendorf, K.A.: The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2016)
Rao, D., Yarowsky, D., Shreevats, A., Gupta, M.: Classifying latent user attributes in twitter. In: 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents, pp. 37–44. ACM (2010)
Rao, S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI agents: from theory to practice. In: Lesser, V.R., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 312–319. The MIT Press, Boston (1995)
Schirra, S., Sun, H., Bentley, F.: Together alone: motivations for live-tweeting a television series. In: 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2441–2450. ACM (2014)
Schweitzer, F., Hołyst, J.A.: Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active brownian particles. Eur. Phys. J. B-Condens. Matter Complex Syst. 15(4), 723–732 (2000)
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 5(1), 3–55 (2001)
Signorini, A., Segre, A.M., Polgreen, P.M.: The use of twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the us during the influenza a h1n1 pandemic. PLoS ONE 6(5), e19467 (2011)
Timm, I., Berndt, J., Lorig, F., Barth, C., Bucher, H.J.: Dynamic analysis of communication processes using twitter data. In: 2nd International Conference on Human and Social Analytics (HUSO 2016), pp. 14–22. IARIA (2016)
Vandenhoven, S., De Clercq, O.: What does the bird say? exploring the link between personality and language use in dutch tweets. In: 2nd International Conference on Human and Social Analytics (HUSO 2016), pp. 38–42. IARIA (2016)
Vega-Redondo, F.: Complex Social Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Zhang, C., Sun, J., Wang, K.: Information propagation in microblog networks. In: 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 190–196. ACM (2013)
Acknowledgments
We thank Carla Schmidt, Christof Barth, and Hans-Jürgen Bucher for providing us with the data set and a media studies perspective on our application example.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodermund, S.C., Lorig, F., Berndt, J.O., Timm, I.J. (2017). An Agent Architecture for Simulating Communication Dynamics in Social Media. In: Berndt, J., Petta, P., Unland, R. (eds) Multiagent System Technologies. MATES 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10413. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64797-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64798-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)