Skip to main content

The Pausing Method Based on Brown Clustering and Word Embedding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10458))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2370 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most important parts of the synthesis of natural speech is the correct pause placement. Properly placed pauses in speech affect the perception of information. In this article, we consider the method of predicting pause positions for the synthesis of speech. For this purpose, two speech corpora were prepared in the Kazakh language. The input parameters were vector representations of words obtained from the cluster model and from the algorithm of the canonical correlations analysis. The support vector machine was used to predict the pauses within the sentence. Our results show F-1 = 0.781 for pause prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The bigram is two words (tokens), which are adjacent in the text box.

  2. 2.

    POS tagging - automatic morphological marking.

References

  1. Parlikar, A., Black, A.W.: Modeling pause-duration for style-specific speech synthesis. In: INTERSPEECH, pp. 446–449. ISCA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norkevicius, G., Raskinis, G.: Modeling phone duration of Lithuanian by classification and regression trees, using very large speech corpus. Inf. Lith. Acad. Sci. 19(2), 271–284 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bali, K., Nemala, S.K., Ramakrishnan, A.G., Talukdar, P.P.: Duration modeling for Hindi text-to-speech synthesis system. In: INTERSPEECH (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, P.F., et al.: Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Comput. Linguist. 18(4), 467–479 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stratos, K. Kim, D., Collins, M., Hsu., D.: A spectral algorithm for learning class-based n-gram models of natural language. In: Zhang, N.L., Tian, J. (eds.) UAI, pp. 762–771. AUAI Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarkar, P., Sreenivasa, R.K.: Data-driven pause prediction for speech synthesis in storytelling style speech. In: Twenty First National Conference on Communications (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parlikar, A., Black, A.W.: A grammar based approach to style specific phrase prediction. In: INTERSPEECH, pp. 2149–2152. ISCA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, S., Guinness, J., Zamanian, A.: Name tagging with word clusters and discriminative training. In: HLT-NAACL, pp. 337–342 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koo, T., Carreras, X., Collins, M.: Simple semi-supervised dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of ACL 2008: HLT, pp. 595–603. Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stratos, K., Collins, M.: Simple semi-supervised POS tagging. In: Blunsom, P., et al. (eds.) VS@HLT-NAACL, pp. 79–87. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loh, W.-Y.: Classification and regression tree methods. In: Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability, pp. 315–323. Wiley (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chistikov, P., Khomitsevich, O.: Improving prosodic break detection in a Russian TTS system. In: Železný, M., Habernal, I., Ronzhin, A. (eds.) SPECOM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8113, pp. 181–188. Springer, Cham (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01931-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Chistikov, P.G., Khomitsevich, O.G., Rybin, S.V.: Statistical methods for automatic prosodic break detection in a text-to-speech systems. J. Instrum. Eng. 57(2), 28–32 (2014). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Government of the Russian Federation, Grant 074-U01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arman Kaliyev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaliyev, A., Rybin, S.V., Matveev, Y. (2017). The Pausing Method Based on Brown Clustering and Word Embedding. In: Karpov, A., Potapova, R., Mporas, I. (eds) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10458. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66429-3_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66429-3_74

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66428-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66429-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics