Skip to main content

Hesitant Fuzzy Evaluation of System Requirements in Job Matching Platform Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017 (EUSFLAT 2017, IWIFSGN 2017)

Abstract

System requirements are vital for software development. Defining the appropriate requirements and their importance levels and taking the necessary actions to fulfill the most crucial ones are the keys to a successful software program. However, prioritization of the requirements is a complex problem that involves fuzziness and ambiguities. In this study, we propose a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on HFLTS (Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets) to evaluate the system requirements. The proposed method is applied to G@together project that focuses on developing an electronic job-matching platform for disadvantaged people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davis, A.M.: The art of requirements triage. Computer 36(3), 42–49 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mead, N.R.: Software Engineering Requirements Prioritization Introduction. Institute Web Publication, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Perini, A., et al.: An empirical study to compare the accuracy of AHP and CBRanking techniques for requirements prioritization. In: Fifth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Achimugu, P., et al.: A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(6), 568–585 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruhe, G., Eberlein, A., Pfahl, D.: Trade-off analysis for requirements selection. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 13(4), 345–366 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finkelstein, A., et al.: A search based approach to fairness analysis in requirement assignments to aid negotiation, mediation and decision making. Requirements Eng. 14(4), 231–245 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barney, S., Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: A product management challenge: creating software product value through requirements selection. J. Syst. Archit. 54(6), 576–593 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berander, P., Khan, K.A., Lehtola, L.: Towards a research framework on requirements prioritization. In: Proceedings of Sixth Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice in Sweden (SERPS 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leffingwell, D., Widrig, D.: Managing Software Requirements: A Unified Approach. Addison-Wesley Longman Inc., Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi, A., Maekawa, M.: Need-based requirements change management. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems, ECBS 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kassel, N.W., Malloy, B.A.: An approach to automate requirements elicitation and specification. In: Proceedings of the 7th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mendel, J.M.: Uncertainty, fuzzy logic, and signal processing. Sig. Process. 80(6), 913–933 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Akao, Y.: Development History of Quality Function Deployment. The Customer Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Deployment. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karlsson, L., et al.: Pair-wise comparisons versus planning game partitioning—experiments on requirements prioritisation techniques. Empirical Softw. Eng. 12(1), 3–33 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodríguez, R.M., Liu, H., Martínez, L.: A fuzzy representation for the semantics of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 277, 745–757 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Cevik Onar, S., Büyüközkan, G., Öztayşi, B., Kahraman, C.: A new hesitant fuzzy QFD approach: an application to computer workstation selection. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 46, 1–16 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Filev, D., Yager, R.R.: On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 94(2), 157–169 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Sánchez, F., et al.: An ontology-based intelligent system for recruitment. Expert Syst. Appl. 31(2), 248–263 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, H.T.: A job placement intervention using fuzzy approach for two-way choice. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 2543–2553 (2009). Part 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faliagka, E., Tsakalidis, A., Tzimas, G.: An integrated e-recruitment system for automated personality mining and applicant ranking. Internet Res. 22(5), 551–568 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Álvarez de Toledo, P., Núñez, F., Usabiaga, C.: An empirical approach on labour segmentation. Applications with individual duration data. Econ. Model. 36, 252–267 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, J., et al.: Recommendations for two-way selections using skyline view queries. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 34(2), 1–28 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sezi Cevik Onar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Kahraman, C. (2018). Hesitant Fuzzy Evaluation of System Requirements in Job Matching Platform Design. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 643. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66827-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66827-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66826-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66827-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics