Skip to main content

Issues in Machine-Checking the Decidability of Implicational Ticket Entailment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10501))

  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

The decidability of the implicational fragment \(T_{\rightarrow }\) of the relevance logic of ticket entailment was recently claimed independently by Bimbó and Dunn, and Padovani. We present a mechanised formalisation, in Isabelle/HOL, of the various proof-theoretical results due to Bimbó and Dunn that underpin their claim. We also discuss the issues that stymied our attempt to verify their proof of decidability.

J.E. Dawson—Supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP120101244.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bimbó, K., Dunn, J.M.: New consecution calculi for \({R}_{\rightarrow }^{\mathbf{t}}\). Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 53(4), 491–509 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bimbó, K., Dunn, J.M.: On the decidability of implicational ticket entailment. J. Symb. Logic 78(1), 214–236 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson, J.E., Clouston, R., Goré, R., Tiu, A.: From display calculi to deep nested sequent calculi: formalised for full intuitionistic linear logic. In: Diaz, J., Lanese, I., Sangiorgi, D. (eds.) TCS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8705, pp. 250–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44602-7_20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson, J.E., Goré, R.: Formalised cut admissibility for display logic. In: Carreño, V.A., Muñoz, C.A., Tahar, S. (eds.) TPHOLs 2002. LNCS, vol. 2410, pp. 131–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-45685-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson, J.E., Goré, R.: Generic methods for formalising sequent calculi applied to provability logic. In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6397, pp. 263–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunn, J.M.: (abstract only) A ‘Gentzen system’ for positive relevant implication. J. Symb. Logic 38, 356–357 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goré, R.: Machine checking proof theory: an application of logic to logic. In: Ramanujam, R., Sarukkai, S. (eds.) ICLA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5378, pp. 23–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92701-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Goré, R., Ramanayake, R.: Valentini’s cut-elimination for provability logic resolved. Rew. Symb. Logic 5(2), 212–238 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Padovani, V.: Ticket entailment is decidable. CoRR, abs/1106.1875 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Katalin Bimbó, Michael Dunn and John Slaney for their helpful comments. All remaining errors are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev Goré .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dawson, J.E., Goré, R. (2017). Issues in Machine-Checking the Decidability of Implicational Ticket Entailment. In: Schmidt, R., Nalon, C. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10501. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66902-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66902-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66901-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66902-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics