Skip to main content

Multiparty Interactions for Coordination in a Mixed Human-Agent Teamwork

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10498))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Virtual environments for human learning enable one or more users to interact with virtual agents in order to perform their tasks. This collaboration necessitates that the members of the team share a set of beliefs and reason about resources, plans and actions to be implemented. This article introduces a new multiparty coordination model allowing several virtual and human agents to dialogue and reason about the tasks that the user must learn. The proposed model relies on a shared plan based approach to represent the beliefs of the team members. The management of the multiparty aspect makes it possible to differentiate the behaviors to be produced according to the type of receiver of a communication: recipient or listener. Finally, in the context of learning a procedural activity, a study examines the effect of our multiparty model on a learner. Results show that the use of proactive pedagogical agents with multiparty competencies boosts the construction of common beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ales, Z., Pauchet, A., Knippel, A.: Extraction de motifs dialogiques bidimensionnels. Revue d’intelligence Artificielle 29(6), 655–684 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barange, M.: Task-Oriented Communicative Capabilities of Agents in Collaborative Virtual Environments for Training. Thesis, UBO, Brest, France (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohus, D., Horvitz, E.: Multiparty turn taking in situated dialog: study, lessons, and directions. In: SIGDIAL, pp. 98–109 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cao, Y., Yu, W., Ren, W., Chen, G.: An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination. Transactions on Industrial Informatics 9(1), 427–438 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chevaillier, P., Trinh, T.H., Barange, M., Devillers, F., Soler, J., De Loor, P., Querrec, R.: Semantic modelling of virtual environments using MASCARET. In: SEARIS, Singapore (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Confirmations and joint action. In: IJCAI, pp. 951–957 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., Synteta, P.: Virtual learning environments. In: 3rd Hellenic Conference on Information & Communication Technologies in Education, pp. 3–18. Kastaniotis Editions, Greece (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dugdale, J., Pavard, J., Soubie, B.: A pragmatic development of a computer simulation of an emergency call center. In: COOP, pp. 241–256 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: A logical view on teamwork. In: Eijck, J., Verbrugge, R. (eds.) Games, Actions and Social Software. LNCS, vol. 7010, pp. 184–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29326-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence 86(2), 269–357 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jégou, M., Lefebvre, L., Chevaillier, P.: A continuous model for the management of turn-taking in user-agent spoken interactions based on the variations of prosodic signals. In: Brinkman, W.-P., Broekens, J., Heylen, D. (eds.) IVA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9238, pp. 389–398. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P.J., Jonker, C.M., Van Riemsdijk, M.B., Sierhuis, M.: Coactive design: Designing support for interdependence in joint activity. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3(1), 43–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamali, K., Fan, X., Yen, J.: Formal semantics for multiparty proactive communication in agent teams. In: Advances in Agent Communication. LNAI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, S., Huber, M.J., McGee, D., Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Semantics of agent communication languages for group interaction. In: AAAI, pp. 42–47 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levesque, H.J., Cohen, P.R., Nunes, J.H.T.: On acting together. In: AAAI, pp. 94–99 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panzarasa, P., Jennings, N.R., Norman, T.J.: Formalizing collaborative decision-making and practical reasoning in multi-agent systems. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(1), 55–117 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelachaud, C.: Modelling multimodal expression of emotion in a virtual agent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364(1535), 3539–3548 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rich, C., Sidner, C.L.: Diamondhelp: A generic collaborative task guidance system. AI Magazine 28(2), 33 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rich, C., Sidner, C.L., Lesh, N.: Collagen: applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction. AI Mag. 22(4), 15–25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saunier, J., Balbo, F., Pinson, S.: A formal model of communication and context awareness in multiagent systems. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(2), 219–247 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Saunier, J., Barange, M., Blandin, B., Querrec, R.: A methodology for the design of pedagogically adaptable learning environments. The International Journal of Virtual Reality IJVR 16(01), 15–21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sierhuis, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Acquisti, A., Hoof, R.V., Jeffers, R., Uszok, A.: Human-agent teamwork and adjustable autonomy in practice. In: I-SAIRAS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7, 83–124 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Traum, D., Rickel, J.: Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds. In: AAMAS, pp. 766–773. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: The cooperative problem-solving process. J. of Logic and Computation 9(4), 563–592 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y., Ioerger, T.R., Volz, R.A.: Decision-theoretic proactive communication in multiagent teamwork. In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 3903–3908. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh Barange .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barange, M., Saunier, J., Pauchet, A. (2017). Multiparty Interactions for Coordination in a Mixed Human-Agent Teamwork. In: Beskow, J., Peters, C., Castellano, G., O'Sullivan, C., Leite, I., Kopp, S. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67400-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67401-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics