Skip to main content

Dominance Based Monte Carlo Algorithm for Preference Elicitation in the Multi-criteria Sorting Problem: Some Performance Tests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10576))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this article, we study the Dominance Based Monte Carlo algorithm, a model-free Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding (MCDA) method for sorting problems, which was first proposed in Denat and Öztürk (2016). The sorting problem consists in assigning each object to a category, both the set of objects and the set of categories being predefined. This method is based on a sub-set of objects which are assigned to categories by a decision maker and aims at being able to assign the remaining objects to categories according to the decision makers preferences. This method is said model-free, which means that we do not assume that the decision maker’s reasoning follows some well-known and explicitly described rules or logic system. It is assumed that monotonicity should be respected as well as the learning set. The specificity of this approach is to be stochastic. A Monte Carlo principle is used where the median operator aggregates the results of independent and randomized experiments. In a previous article some theoretical properties that are met by this method were studied. Here we want to assess its performance through a k-fold validation procedure and compare this performance to those of other preference elicitation algorithms. We also show how the result of this method converges to a deterministic value when the number of trials or the size of the learning set increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at https://github.com/oso/pymcda/tree/master/datasets.

  2. 2.

    Find this package at: https://github.com/paterijk/MCDA.

References

  • Carbone, E., Hey, J.D.: Which error story is best? J. Risk Uncertain. 20(2), 161–176 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denat, T., Öztürk, M.: Dominance based montecarlo algorithm for preference learning in the multi-criteria sorting problem Theoretical properties. In: DA2PL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaud, J., Groussaud, G., Jacquet-Lagreze, E.: (utadis): Une methode de construction de fonctions d’utilite additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. In: European Working Group on MCDA, Bochum, Germany (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallah Tehrani, A., Huellermeier, E.: Ordinal choquistic regression. In: EUSFLAT Conference (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129(1), 1–47 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Multicriteria classification by dominance-based rough set approach. In: Kloesgen, W., Zytkow, J. (eds.) Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Siskos, J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the uta method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 151–164 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives preferences and value tradeoffs. Behav. Sci. 39(2), 169–170 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., Salminen, P.: SMAA - stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106(1), 137–143 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D.: Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46(1), 1–27 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., Davis-Stober, C.P.: Transitivity of preferences. Psychol. Rev. 118(1), 42 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ron, K.: A study of cross validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: IJCAI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide Multicritère à la Décision : Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning a majority rule model from large sets of assignment examples. In: Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds.) ADT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8176, pp. 336–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., Pirlot, M.: Learning the parameters of a non compensatory sorting model. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) ADT 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9346, pp. 153–170. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen, T., Figueira, J.R., Lahdelma, R., Dias, J.A., Salminen, P.: A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(1), 236–242 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Denat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Denat, T., Öztürk, M. (2017). Dominance Based Monte Carlo Algorithm for Preference Elicitation in the Multi-criteria Sorting Problem: Some Performance Tests. In: Rothe, J. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10576. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67504-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67504-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67503-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67504-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics