Skip to main content

Environmental and Idiothetic Cues to Reference Frame Selection in Path Integration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Cognition X (Spatial Cognition 2016, KogWis 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10523))

Abstract

The current study investigated the ways in which environmental and idiothetic cues affect the nature of the reference frame (i.e., egocentric or allocentric) in path integration in a virtual environment. Participants navigated to multiple waypoints and then attempted to walk or point to the first waypoint. We manipulated the environmental geometry, complexity of the outbound path, availability of idiothetic cues (vestibular, proprioceptive, & efferent motor information) and initial heading in the virtual environment to examine the reference frame in path integration. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that when idiothetic cues were present, participants adopted an egocentric reference frame regardless of the environmental geometry and outbound path complexity. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that when idiothetic cues were absent, participants adopted the initial heading as the reference direction. We concluded that unlike their marked influence on reference directions in spatial memory, environmental cues had little impact on the reference frame in path integration regardless of the availability of idiothetic cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Etienne, A.S., Maurer, R., Boulens, V., Levy, A., Rowe, T.: Resetting the path integrator: a basic condition for route-based navigation. J. Exp. Biol. 207(9), 1491–1508 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallistel, C.R.: The Organization of Learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Wittlinger, M., Wehner, R., Wolf, H.: The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps. Science 312(5782), 1965–1967 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B., Moser, E.I.: Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436(7052), 801–806 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fyhn, M., Hafting, T., Treves, A., Moser, M.-B., Moser, E.I.: Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex. Nature 446(7132), 190–194 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yartsev, M.M., Witter, M.P., Ulanovsky, N.: Grid cells without theta oscillations in the entorhinal cortex of bats. Nature 479(7371), 103–107 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Killian, N.J., Jutras, M.J., Buffalo, E.A.: A map of visual space in the primate entorhinal cortex. Nature 491(7426), 761–764 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, X., He, Q., Kelly, J.W., Fiete, I.R., McNamara, T.P.: Bias in human path integration is predicted by properties of grid cells. Curr. Biol. 25(13), 1771–1776 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doeller, C.F., Barry, C., Burgess, N.: Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network. Nature 463(7281), 657–661 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs, J., et al.: Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation. Nat. Neurosci. 16(9), 1188–1190 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Cicinelli, J.G., Pellegrino, J.W., Fry, P.A.: Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122(1), 73–91 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waller, D., Hodgson, E.: Sensory contributions to spatial knowledge of real and virtual environments. In: Steinicke, F., Visell, Y., Campos, J., Lécuyer, A. (eds.) Human Walking in Virtual Environments, pp. 3–26. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8432-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, M., Zhou, G., Mou, W., Hayward, W.G., Owen, C.B.: Spatial updating during locomotion does not eliminate viewpoint-dependent visual object processing. Vis. Cogn. 15(4), 402–419 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujita, N., Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Golledge, R.G.: The encoding-error model of pathway completion without vision. Geogr. Anal. 25(4), 295–314 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, R.F., Spelke, E.S.: Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77(3), 215–250 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klatzky, R.L.: Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1404, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly, J.W., Avraamides, M.N., Loomis, J.M.: Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33(6), 1092–1107 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mou, W., McNamara, T.P., Valiquette, C.M., Rump, B.: Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30(1), 142–157 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mou, W., Zhang, H., McNamara, T.P.: Novel-view scene recognition relies on identifying spatial reference directions. Cognition 111(2), 175–186 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Beall, A.C., Chance, S.S., Golledge, R.G.: Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol. Sci. 9(4), 293–298 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly, J.W., McNamara, T.P.: Spatial memories of virtual environments: how egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15(2), 322–327 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiener, J.M., Berthoz, A., Wolbers, T.: Dissociable cognitive mechanisms underlying human path integration. Exp. Brain Res. 208(1), 61–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Etienne, A.S., Jeffery, K.J.: Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14(2), 180–192 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiener, J.M., Mallot, H.A.: Path complexity does not impair visual path integration. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 6(4), 333–346 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rump, B., McNamara, T.P.: Representations of interobject spatial relations in long-term memory. Mem. Cogn. 41(2), 201–213 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rouder, J.N., Speckman, P.L., Sun, D., Morey, R.D., Iverson, G.: Bayesian \(t\) tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16(2), 225–237 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Richard, L., Waller, D.: Toward a definition of intrinsic axes: the effect of orthogonality and symmetry on the preferred direction of spatial memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39(6), 1914–1929 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly, J.W., McNamara, T.P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T.H., Rieser, J.J.: The shape of human navigation: how environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation. Cognition 109(2), 281–286 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly, J.W., McNamara, T.P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T.H., Rieser, J.J.: Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16(1), 176–181 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shelton, A.L., McNamara, T.P.: Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4(1), 102–106 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shelton, A.L., McNamara, T.P.: Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cogn. Psychol. 43(4), 274–310 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Manning, J.R., Lew, T.F., Li, N., Sekuler, R., Kahana, M.J.: MAGELLAN: a cognitive map-based model of human wayfinding. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143(3), 1314–1330 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meilinger, T., Riecke, B.E., Bülthoff, H.H.: Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67(3), 542–569 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meilinger, T.: The network of reference frames theory: a synthesis of graphs and cognitive maps. In: Freksa, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P., Wölfl, S. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5248, pp. 344–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Mou, W., McNamara, T.P., Zhang, L.: Global frames of reference organize configural knowledge of paths. Cognition 129(1), 180–193 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the previous version of this article. This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant 1526448.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy P. McNamara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

He, Q., McNamara, T.P., Kelly, J.W. (2017). Environmental and Idiothetic Cues to Reference Frame Selection in Path Integration. In: Barkowsky, T., Burte, H., Hölscher, C., Schultheis, H. (eds) Spatial Cognition X. Spatial Cognition KogWis 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10523. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68188-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68189-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics