Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revocable Predicate Encryption from Lattices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Provable Security (ProvSec 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 10592))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Predicate encryption, formalized by Katz, Sahai, and Waters (EUROCRYPT 2008), is an attractive branch of public-key encryption, which provides fine-grained and role-based access to encrypted data. As for many multi-user cryptosystems, an efficient revocation mechanism is necessary and imperative in the context of predicate encryption, in order to address scenarios when users misbehave or their private keys are compromised. The formal model of revocable predicate encryption was introduced by Nieto, Manulis and Sun (ACISP 2012), who suggest the strong, full-hiding security notion, demanding that the ciphertexts do not leak any information about the encrypted data, the attribute and the revocation information associated with it.

In this work, we introduce the first construction of lattice-based revocable predicate encryption. Our scheme satisfies the full-hiding security notion (in a selective manner) in the standard model, based on the hardness of the Learning With Errors \((\mathsf {LWE})\) problem. In terms of asymptotic efficiency, the scheme is somewhat comparable to the pairing-based instantiation put forward by Nieto, Manulis and Sun. Furthermore, better efficiency could be easily achieved in the random oracle model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agrawal, S., Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Efficient lattice (H)IBE in the standard model. In: Gilbert, H. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110, pp. 553–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, S., Freeman, D.M., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Functional encryption for inner product predicates from learning with errors. In: Lee, D.H., Wang, X. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 7073, pp. 21–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25385-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajtai, M.: Generating hard instances of the short basis problem. In: Wiedermann, J., van Emde Boas, P., Nielsen, M. (eds.) ICALP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1644, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-48523-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alwen, J., Peikert, C.: Generating shorter bases for hard random lattices. Theory Comput. Syst. 48(3), 535–553 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Attrapadung, N., Imai, H.: Attribute-based encryption supporting direct/indirect revocation modes. In: Parker, M.G. (ed.) IMACC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5921, pp. 278–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10868-6_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Attrapadung, N., Libert, B.: Functional encryption for inner product: achieving constant-size ciphertexts with adaptive security or support for negation. In: Nguyen, P.Q., Pointcheval, D. (eds.) PKC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6056, pp. 384–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13013-7_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In: CCS 1993, pp. 62–73. ACM (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boldyreva, A., Goyal, V., Kumar, V.: Identity-based encryption with efficient revocation. In: CCS 2008, pp. 417–426. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boneh, D., Franklin, M.: Identity-based encryption from the weil pairing. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 213–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi:10.1007/3-540-44647-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Boneh, D., Waters, B.: Conjunctive, subset, and range queries on encrypted data. In: Vadhan, S.P. (ed.) TCC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4392, pp. 535–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70936-7_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, J., Lim, H.W., Ling, S., Wang, H., Nguyen, K.: Revocable identity-based encryption from lattices. In: Susilo, W., Mu, Y., Seberry, J. (eds.) ACISP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7372, pp. 390–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31448-3_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, S., Zhang, J.: Adaptive-ID secure revocable identity-based encryption from lattices via subset difference method. In: Lopez, J., Wu, Y. (eds.) ISPEC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9065, pp. 283–297. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17533-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gay, R., Méaux, P., Wee, H.: Predicate encryption for multi-dimensional range queries from lattices. In: Katz, J. (ed.) PKC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9020, pp. 752–776. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46447-2_34

    Google Scholar 

  14. Genise, N., Micciancio, D.: Faster gaussian sampling for trapdoor lattices with arbitrary modulus. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2017:308 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gentry, C., Peikert, C., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions. In: STOC 2008, pp. 197–206. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gorbunov, S., Vaikuntanathan, V., Wee, H.: Predicate encryption for circuits from LWE. In: Gennaro, R., Robshaw, M. (eds.) CRYPTO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9216, pp. 503–523. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48000-7_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data. In: CCS 2006, pp. 89–98. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gur, K.D., Polyakov, Y., Rohloff, K., Ryan, G.W., Savas, E.: Implementation and evaluation of improved Gaussian sampling for lattice trapdoors. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2017:285 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Katz, J., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Predicate encryption supporting disjunctions, polynomial equations, and inner products. In: Smart, N. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 4965, pp. 146–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, K., Kim, I., Hwang, S.O.: Privacy preserving revocable predicate encryption revisited. Secur. Commun. Netw. 8(3), 471–485 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewko, A., Okamoto, T., Sahai, A., Takashima, K., Waters, B.: Fully secure functional encryption: attribute-based encryption and (hierarchical) inner product encryption. In: Gilbert, H. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110, pp. 62–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Libert, B., Peters, T., Yung, M.: Group signatures with almost-for-free revocation. In: Safavi-Naini, R., Canetti, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2012. LNCS, vol. 7417, pp. 571–589. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Libert, B., Peters, T., Yung, M.: Scalable group signatures with revocation. In: Pointcheval, D., Johansson, T. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7237, pp. 609–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Libert, B., Vergnaud, D.: Adaptive-ID secure revocable identity-based encryption. In: Fischlin, M. (ed.) CT-RSA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5473, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00862-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Micciancio, D., Mol, P.: Pseudorandom knapsacks and the sample complexity of lwe search-to-decision reductions. In: Rogaway, P. (ed.) CRYPTO 2011. LNCS, vol. 6841, pp. 465–484. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22792-9_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Micciancio, D., Peikert, C.: Trapdoors for lattices: simpler, tighter, faster, smaller. In: Pointcheval, D., Johansson, T. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7237, pp. 700–718. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Micciancio, D., Walter, M.: Gaussian sampling over the integers: efficient, generic, constant-time. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2017:259 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Naor, D., Naor, M., Lotspiech, J.: Revocation and tracing schemes for stateless receivers. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 41–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi:10.1007/3-540-44647-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen, K., Wang, H., Zhang, J.: Server-aided revocable identity-based encryption from lattices. In: Foresti, S., Persiano, G. (eds.) CANS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10052, pp. 107–123. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48965-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. González-Nieto, J.M., Manulis, M., Sun, D.: Fully private revocable predicate encryption. In: Susilo, W., Mu, Y., Seberry, J. (eds.) ACISP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7372, pp. 350–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31448-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Gonźalez-Nieto, J.M., Manulis, M., Sun, D.: Fully private revocable predicate encryption. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2012:403 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Okamoto, T., Takashima, K.: Hierarchical predicate encryption for inner-products. In: Matsui, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5912, pp. 214–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10366-7_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Okamoto, T., Takashima, K.: Fully secure functional encryption with general relations from the decisional linear assumption. In: Rabin, T. (ed.) CRYPTO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6223, pp. 191–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Okamoto, T., Takashima, K.: Achieving short ciphertexts or short secret-keys for adaptively secure general inner-product encryption. In: Lin, D., Tsudik, G., Wang, X. (eds.) CANS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7092, pp. 138–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25513-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Okamoto, T., Takashima, K.: Adaptively attribute-hiding (hierarchical) inner product encryption. In: Pointcheval, D., Johansson, T. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7237, pp. 591–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Peikert, C.: Public-key cryptosystems from the worst-case shortest vector problem: extended abstract. In: STOC 2009, pp. 333–342. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Peikert, C., Vaikuntanathan, V., Waters, B.: A framework for efficient and composable oblivious transfer. In: Wagner, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 2008. LNCS, vol. 5157, pp. 554–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85174-5_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Regev, O.: On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. In: STOC 2005, pp. 84–93. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sahai, A., Seyalioglu, H., Waters, B.: Dynamic credentials and ciphertext delegation for attribute-based encryption. In: Safavi-Naini, R., Canetti, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2012. LNCS, vol. 7417, pp. 199–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Fuzzy identity-based encryption. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 457–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11426639_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Seo, J.H., Emura, K.: Efficient delegation of key generation and revocation functionalities in identity-based encryption. In: Dawson, E. (ed.) CT-RSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7779, pp. 343–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36095-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Seo, J.H., Emura, K.: Revocable identity-based encryption revisited: security model and construction. In: Kurosawa, K., Hanaoka, G. (eds.) PKC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7778, pp. 216–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36362-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Seo, J.H., Emura, K.: Revocable hierarchical identity-based encryption. Theor. Comput. Sci. 542, 44–62 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Seo, J.H., Emura, K.: Revocable identity-based cryptosystem revisited: security sodels and constructions. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 9(7), 1193–1205 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Seo, J.H., Emura, K.: Adaptive-ID secure revocable hierarchical identity-based encryption. In: Tanaka, K., Suga, Y. (eds.) IWSEC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9241, pp. 21–38. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22425-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Shi, E., Bethencourt, J., Chan, H.T.-H., Song, D.X., Perrig, A.: Multi-dimensional range query over encrypted data. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P 2007), pp. 350–364. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Takayasu, A., Watanabe, Y.: Lattice-based revocable identity-based encryption with bounded decryption key exposure resistance. In: Pieprzyk, J., Suriadi, S. (eds.) ACISP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10342, pp. 184–204. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60055-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Watanabe, Y., Emura, K., Seo, J.H.: New revocable IBE in prime-order groups: adaptively secure, decryption key exposure resistant, and with short public parameters. In: Handschuh, H. (ed.) CT-RSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10159, pp. 432–449. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52153-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Waters, B.: Dual system encryption: realizing fully secure IBE and HIBE under simple assumptions. In: Halevi, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5677, pp. 619–636. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03356-8_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Xagawa, K.: Improved (hierarchical) inner-product encryption from lattices. In: Kurosawa, K., Hanaoka, G. (eds.) PKC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7778, pp. 235–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36362-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers for helpful discussions and comments. The research was supported by the “Singapore Ministry of Education under Research Grant MOE2016-T2-2-014(S)”. Huaxiong Wang was also supported by NTU under Tier 1 grant RG143/14.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    San Ling, Khoa Nguyen, Huaxiong Wang & Juanyang Zhang

Authors
  1. San Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khoa Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huaxiong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juanyang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juanyang Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. NTT Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan

    Tatsuaki Okamoto

  2. Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China

    Yong Yu

  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

    Man Ho Au

  4. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

    Yannan Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ling, S., Nguyen, K., Wang, H., Zhang, J. (2017). Revocable Predicate Encryption from Lattices. In: Okamoto, T., Yu, Y., Au, M., Li, Y. (eds) Provable Security. ProvSec 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10592. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68637-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68637-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68636-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68637-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation