Skip to main content

A Formally Verified Single Transferable Voting Scheme with Fractional Values

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 10615))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We formalise a variant of the Single Transferable Vote scheme with fractional transfer values in the theorem prover Coq. Our method advocates the idea of vote counting as application of a sequence of rules. The rules are an intermediate step for specifying the protocol for vote-counting in a precise symbolic language. We then formalise these rules in Coq. This reduces the gap between the legislation and formalisation so that, without knowledge of formal methods, one can still validate the process. Moreover our encoding is modular which enables us to capture other Single Transferable Vote schemes without significant changes. Using the built-in extraction mechanism of Coq, a Haskell program is extracted automatically. This program is guaranteed to meet its specification. Each run of the program outputs a certificate which is a precise, independently checkable record of the trace of computation and provides all relevant details of how the final result is obtained. This establishes correctness, reliability, and verifiability of the count.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Results have been produced on an Intel i7 3.60 GHz Linux desktop computer with 16 GB of RAM.

References

  1. Bertot, Y., Castéran, P., Huet, G., Paulin-Mohrin, C.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development - Coq’Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series, pp. 1–472. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07964-5, ISBN 978-3-642-05880-6

  2. Cordover, M.: LS4883 outcome of internal review of the decision to refuse your FOI request no. LS4849. http://www.aec.gov.au/information-access/foi/2014/files/ls4912-1.pdf

  3. Dawson, J.E., Goré, R., Meumann, T.: Machine-checked reasoning about complex voting schemes using higher-order logic. In: Haenni, R., Koenig, R.E., Wikström, D. (eds.) VOTELID 2015. LNCS, vol. 9269, pp. 142–158. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22270-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. DeYoung, H., SchĂ¼rmann, C.: Linear logical voting protocols. In: Kiayias, A., Lipmaa, H. (eds.) Vote-ID 2011. LNCS, vol. 7187, pp. 53–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32747-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Girard, J.: Linear logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 50, 1–102 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hales, T.C.: Formal proof. Notices AMS 55(11), 1370–1380 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kremer, S., Ryan, M., Smyth, B.: Election verifiability in electronic voting protocols. In: Gritzalis, D., Preneel, B., Theoharidou, M. (eds.) ESORICS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6345, pp. 389–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15497-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Letouzey, P.: Extraction in coq: an overview. In: Beckmann, A., Dimitracopoulos, C., Löwe, B. (eds.) CiE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5028, pp. 359–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69407-6_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lundie, R.: The disputed 2013 WA Senate election. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/FlagPost/2013/November/The_disputed_2013_WA_Senate_election

  10. Gerck, E., Neff, C.A., Rivest, R.L., Rubin, A.D., Yung, M.: The business of electronic voting. In: Syverson, P. (ed.) FC 2001. LNCS, vol. 2339, pp. 243–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-46088-8_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Schack-Nielsen, A., SchĂ¼rmann, C.: Celf – a logical framework for deductive and concurrent systems (system description). In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5195, pp. 320–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. The ANU-Union: The ANU-Union Constitution. http://www.anuunion.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/UnionConstitution-3.pdf

  13. Verity, F., Pattinson, D.: Formally verified invariants of vote counting schemes. In: ACSW, pp. 31:1–31:10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Pattinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ghale, M.K., GorĂ©, R., Pattinson, D. (2017). A Formally Verified Single Transferable Voting Scheme with Fractional Values. In: Krimmer, R., Volkamer, M., Braun Binder, N., Kersting, N., Pereira, O., SchĂ¼rmann, C. (eds) Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10615. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68687-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68687-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68686-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68687-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics