Skip to main content

The Impact of Profile Coherence on Recommendation Performance for Shared Accounts on Smart TVs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Retrieval (CCIR 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10390))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Most recommendation algorithms assume that an account represents a single user, and capture a user’s interest by what he/she has preferred. However, in some applications, e.g., video recommendation on smart TVs, an account is often shared by multiple users who tend to have disparate interests. It poses great challenges for delivering personalized recommendations. In this paper, we propose the concept of profile coherence to measure the coherence of an account’s interests, which is computed as the average similarity between items in the account profile in our implementation. Furthermore, we evaluate the impact of profile coherence on the quality of recommendation lists for coherent and incoherent accounts generated by different variants of item-based collaborative filtering. Experiments conducted on a large-scale watch log on smart TVs conform that the profile coherence indeed impact the quality of recommendation lists in various aspects—accuracy, diversity and popularity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The profile coherence are expected to influence the recommendation performance of other collaborative filtering algorithms too, even content-based filtering methods.

  2. 2.

    We have also experimented with the Jaccard similarity, and the qualitative conclusions are the same.

  3. 3.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_plot.

  4. 4.

    http://www.juhaokan.org/.

  5. 5.

    The qualitative conclusions are the same when we evluate the accuracy of a recommendation list by the other measures such as recall, MRR and MAP.

References

  1. Claypool, M., Gokhale, A., Miranda, T., Murnikov, P., Netes, D., Sartin, M.: Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y., Croft, W.B.: Predicting query performance. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 299–306 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deshpande, M., Karypis, G.: Item-based top-N recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 22(1), 143–177 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekstrand, M.D., Riedl, J.T., Konstan, J.A.: Collaborative filtering recommender systems. Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact. 4(2), 81–173 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghazanfar, M.A., Prügel-Bennett, A.: Leveraging clustering approaches to solve the gray-sheep users problem in recommender systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(7), 3261–3275 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gras, B., Brun, A., Boyer, A.: Identifying grey sheep users in collaborative filtering: a distribution-based technique. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 17–26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gras, B., Brun, A., Boyer, A.: When Users with preferences different from others get inaccurate recommendations. In: Monfort, V., Krempels, K.-H., Majchrzak, T.A., Turk, Ž. (eds.) WEBIST 2015. LNBIP, vol. 246, pp. 191–210. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30996-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith, J., O’Riordan, C., Sorensen, H.: Investigations into user rating information and predictive accuracy in a collaborative filtering domain. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 937–942 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Borchers, A., Riedl, J.: An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 230–237 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, Y., Koren, Y., Volinsky, C.: Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 263–272 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaminskas, M., Bridge, D.: Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: a survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 7(1), 2:1–2:42 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karypis, G.: Evaluation of item-based top-N recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 247–254 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koren, Y., Bell, R., Volinsky, C.: Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8), 30–37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7(1), 76–80 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Recommender Systems Handbook, 2nd edn. Springer, US (2015)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Saia, R., Boratto, L., Carta, S.: A semantic approach to remove incoherent items from a user profile and improve the accuracy of a recommender system. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 47(1), 111–134 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 285–295 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Su, X., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv. Artif. Intell. 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vargas, S., Castells, P.: Improving sales diversity by recommending users to items. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 145–152 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Verstrepen, K., Goethals, B.: Top-N recommendation for shared accounts. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 59–66 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, M., Hurley, N.: Avoiding monotony: improving the diversity of recommendation lists. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 123–130 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (61672322, 61672324), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (2016ZRE27468) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University. We also thank Hisense for providing us with a large-scale watch log on smart TVs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Lian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lian, T., Li, Z., Chen, Z., Ma, J. (2017). The Impact of Profile Coherence on Recommendation Performance for Shared Accounts on Smart TVs. In: Wen, J., Nie, J., Ruan, T., Liu, Y., Qian, T. (eds) Information Retrieval. CCIR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10390. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68699-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68699-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68698-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68699-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics