Skip to main content

General Representation Model for Text Similarity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data (FETLT 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10341))

  • 1370 Accesses

Abstract

Text similarity is a central issue in multiple information access tasks. General speaking, most of existing similarity models focus on a particular kind of text features such as words, n-grams, or linguistic features or distributional semantics units. In this paper, we introducea general theoretical model for integrating multiple sources in the text feature representation called Feature Projection Information model. The proposed model allows us to integrate traditional features such as words with other sources such as the output of classifiers over different categories or distributional semantics information. The theoretical analysis shows that traditional approaches can be seen as particularizations of the model. Our first empirical results support the idea that additional features in the representation step outperform the predictive power of similarity measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notice that minimum and maximum operators are the standard joining and intersection operators for multisets.

References

  1. Amigó, E., de Albornoz, J.C., Chugur, I., Corujo, A., Gonzalo, J., Martín-Wanton, T., Meij, E., de Rijke, M., Spina, D.: Overview of replab 2013: evaluating online reputation monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization - 4th International Conference of the CLEF Initiative (CLEF 2013) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41(6), 391–407 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giménez, J., Màrquez, L.: Linguistic measures for automatic machine translation evaluation. Mach. Transl. 24(3–4), 209–240 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomaa, W.H., Fahmy, A.A.: Article: a survey of text similarity approaches. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 68(13), 13–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grefenstette, G.: Explorations in automatic thesaurus discovery, vol. 278. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Han, L., Kashyap, A.L., Finin, T., Mayfield, J., Weese, J.: UMBC EBIQUITY-CORE: semantic textual similarity systems. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hovy, E., Lin, C.-Y., Zhou, L.: Evaluating DUC 2005 using basic elements. In: Proceedings of DUC, vol. 2005. Citeseer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: ICML, vol. 98, pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, W., Tian, X., Tao, D., Liu J.: Constrained metric learning via distance gap maximization. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2010, pp. 518–524. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malik, R., Subramaniam, L.V., Kaushik, S.: Automatically selecting answer templates to respond to customer emails. In: Veloso, M.M. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 1659–1664 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., Strapparava, C.: Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006), Boston, Massachusetts, July 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. CoRR, abs/1310.4546 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84, 327–352 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Vox-Populi project TIN2013-47090C3-1-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fernando Giner or Enrique Amigó .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Giner, F., Amigó, E. (2017). General Representation Model for Text Similarity. In: Quesada, J., Martín Mateos , FJ., López Soto, T. (eds) Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data. FETLT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69365-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69365-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69364-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69365-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics