Skip to main content

Abstract

Nowadays, while performing their investigations, researchers often face large datasets requiring fast processing for analysis and drawing adequate conclusions. Data mining, statistical methods and big data analytics provide an impressive arsenal of tools allowing scientists to address those tasks. However, in some cases investigators need techniques enabling on the base of relatively simple and cheap measurements of easily accessible parameters to build useful and meaningful concepts of an area of research.

In our paper two classes of dynamical models aimed at revealing between-component relationships in natural systems with feedback are presented. The idea of the both models follows from the frameworks of theoretical biology and ecology, where pairwise interactions between the parts of a system are regarded as background of the system’s behavior. Both deterministic and stochastic cases are considered, that allow us to determine the direction of pairwise relationships in deterministic case and the direction and strength of relationships in stochastic one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Margalef, R.: Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lidicker Jr., W.Z.: A clarification of interactions in ecological systems. Bioscience 29(8), 475–477 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams, P.A.: On classifying interactions between populations. Oecologia 73(2), 272–281 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wootton, J.T., Emmerson, M.: Measurement of interaction strength in nature. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 419–444 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shipley, B.: Cause and Correlation in Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C.N., Scheines, R.: Causation, Prediction, and Search. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bollen, K.A., Pearl, J.: Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In: Morgan, S.L. (ed.) Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, pp. 301–328. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_15

  9. Elwert, F.: Graphical causal models. In: Morgan, S.L. (ed.) Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, pp. 245–273. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_13

  10. Menzies, P.: Causal models, token causation, and processes. Philos. Sci. 71(5), 820–832 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zholtkevych, G.N., Bespalov, Y.G., Nosov, K.V., Abhishek, M.: Discrete modeling of dynamics of zooplankton community at the different stages of an antropogeneous eutrophication. Acta. Biotheor. 61(4), 449–465 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalman, R.E., Falb, P.L., Arbib, M.A.: Topics in Mathematical System Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Blalock, H.M.: Social Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boyd, D., Ellison, N.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarsh. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 13(1), 210–230 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Caprio, D., Santos-Arteaga, F.J., Tavana, M.: Self-organizing social networks by preference similarity and the networking capacity of their users. Procedia Comput. Sci. 83, 496–503 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, M., Mao, S., Liu, Y.: Big data: a survey. Mobile. Netw. Appl. 19, 171–209 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cole, T.J., Bellizzi, M.C., Flegal, K.M., Dietz, W.H.: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ Clin. Res. 320, 1–6 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ICES: Report of the Benchmark Workshop on Arctic Stocks (WKARCT), 26–30 January 2015. ICES Headquarters, Denmark. ICES CM 2015/ACOM:30 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. N. Zholtkevych .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zholtkevych, G.N. et al. (2017). Descriptive Models of System Dynamics. In: Ginige, A., et al. Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications. ICTERI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69965-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69965-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69964-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69965-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics