Skip to main content

Methods of Evaluating the Usability of Human- Computer Interaction (HCI) Design in Mobile Devices for SAR Operation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Visual Informatics (IVIC 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 10645))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2588 Accesses

Abstract

The evaluation process happens when the products need to be evaluated and tested to figure out whether the design meets the needs of user and usability goals established. In this paper, usability testing (real user tests) is conducted to implement the concept of human-computer interaction (HCI) using mobile devices by performing several tasks using an application developed which is HCI Test. HCI Test is a prototype of client-server system using Android mobile device as clients and Windows Tablet or laptop as a server to test the efficiency and effectiveness of command and control (C2) based on the accuracy of response and response time of the clients towards the server. The experiments were carried out using twenty-five (25) test participants supervised by the evaluator that controlled the server. The results obtained also been discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Igler, B., Braumann, T., Böhm, S.: Evaluating the usability of mobile applications without affecting the user and the usage context. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 8047, 92–102 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J.: Cost-justifying usability: an update for an Internet age. http://doi.org/ISBN-10:0120958112 (2005)

  3. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (ed.): The Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines (Enlarged/E). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: introduction to usability why usability is important how to improve usability (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abwod, G.D., Beale, R.: Human Computer Interaction (Third). Pearson Education Limited, London (2004). http://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc14592d

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th edn. Addison Wesley Longman, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Br. Dent. J. 215 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.932

  8. Craven, D.: Usability Testing Basics : An Overview (2016). http://webservices.itcs.umich.edu/drupal/wwwsig/sites/webservices.itcs.umich.edu.drupal.wwwsig/files/Usability-Testing-Basics.pdf

  9. Ibragimova, E. High-fidelity prototyping: what, when, why and how? https://blog.prototypr.io/high-fidelity-prototyping-what-when-why-and-how-f5bbde6a7fd4. Accessed 30 Dec 2016

  10. Nielsen, J.: How many test users in a usability study?. Nielsen Norman Group (2012). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/

  11. Nielsen, J.: What Is usability? In: User Experience Re-Mastered, pp. 3–22. Elsevier (2010). http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375114-0.00004-9

  12. Bruyer, R., Brysbaert, M.: Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE). Psychol. Belg. 51(1), 5–13 (2011). doi:10.5334/pb-51-1-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zuffi, S., Brambilla, C., Beretta, G., Scala, P.: Human computer interaction: legibility and contrast. In: Proceedings - 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, ICIAP 2007, pp. 241–246 (2007). http://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAP.2007.4362786

  14. Buchner, A., Mayr, S., Brandt, M.: The advantage of positive text-background polarity is due to high display luminance. Ergonomics 52(7), 882–886 (2009). doi:10.1080/00140130802641635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Piepenbrock, C., Mayr, S., Mund, I., Buchner, A.: Positive display polarity is advantageous for both younger and older adults. Ergonomics 56(7), 1116–1124 (2003). doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.790485

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Syed Nasir Alsagoff Syed Zakaria or Norshahriah Wahab .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mat Zaini, N.S.S., Syed Zakaria, S.N.A., Wahab, N. (2017). Methods of Evaluating the Usability of Human- Computer Interaction (HCI) Design in Mobile Devices for SAR Operation. In: Badioze Zaman, H., et al. Advances in Visual Informatics. IVIC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70009-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70010-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics