Skip to main content

Coevolution of Cooperation and Complex Networks via Indirect Reciprocity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10638))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Most previous research on indirect reciprocity was in well-mixed population. Distinguishing the interacting network from learning network provides a chance to study indirect reciprocity in networks. Unlike previous research, we propose a coevolution model of cooperation and complex networks via indirect reciprocity, where an individual can interact globally but update strategy locally. Based on this model, we describe the simulation results of coevolution, including the effects of rewiring mechanism on the evolution of cooperation, and how the evolution of cooperation affects networks restructure. Results show that rewiring mechanism favors the evolution of cooperation and the evolution of cooperation can restructure social networks. To understand and explain the results in detail, we graphically depict the snapshots of coevolution process. These findings facilitate us to further understand the evolution of cooperation and the restructure of complex networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rand, D.G., Nowak, M.A.: Human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 413–425 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, J.M.: Evolution and the Theory Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridgeshire (1982)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nowak, M.A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaggl, M.A.: Eleven mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. J. Inst. Econ. 10, 197–230 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, A.Z., Zhang, Y.L., Chen, X.J., Sun, C.Y.: Randomness and diversity matter in the maintenance of the public resources. EPL 117, 58002 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437, 1291–1298 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wedekind, C.: Give and ye shall be recognized. Science 280, 2070–2071 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swakman, V., Molleman, L., Ule, A., Egas, M.: Reputation-based cooperation: empirical evidence for behavioral strategies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 37, 230–235 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393, 573–577 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 194, 561–574 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sigmund, K.: Moral assessment in indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 299, 25–30 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y.: How should we define goodness? Reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 231, 107–120 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y.: The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 239, 435–444 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitaker, R.M., Colombo, G.B., Allen, S.M., Dunbar, R.I.M.: A dominant social comparison heuristic unites alternative mechanisms for the evolution of indirect reciprocity. Sci. Rep. 6, 31459 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seki, M., Nakamaru, M.: A model for gossip-mediated evolution of altruism with various types of false information by speakers and assessment by listeners. J. Theor. Biol. 407, 90–105 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Tian, L.L., Li, M.C., Wang, Z.: Cooperation enhanced by indirect reciprocity in spatial prisoners dilemma games for social P2P systems. Physica A. 462, 1252–1260 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peleteiro, A., Burguillo, J.C., Chong, S.Y.: Exploring indirect reciprocity in complex networks using coalitions and rewiring. In: 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Paris, pp. 669–676. AAMAS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. FRF-TP-15-116A1), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M580989), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61603036, 61520106009 and 61533008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changyin Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, A., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Sun, C. (2017). Coevolution of Cooperation and Complex Networks via Indirect Reciprocity. In: Liu, D., Xie, S., Li, Y., Zhao, D., El-Alfy, ES. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10638. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4_93

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4_93

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70138-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70139-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics