Skip to main content

Free-Riding in Common Facility Sharing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 10480))

Abstract

We deal with the free-riding situations that may arise from sharing maintenance cost of a facility among its potential users. The non-users may ask for a check to assess who the users are, but they have to pay the related cost; consequently, a non-user may not ask for the check, with the hope that the other non-users ask and pay for it. In this paper, we provide incentives for asking for the check, without suffering a higher cost

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When no confusion arises, we write \(\gamma \) instead of \(\gamma (C)\).

References

  1. Briata, F.: Noncooperative games from TU games with information cost. Int. Game Theor. Rev. 13, 301–323 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hurwicz, L.: The design of mechanisms for resource allocation. Am. Econ. Rev. 63, 1–30 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maskin, E.: Mechanism design: how to implement social goals. Les Prix Nobel 2007, 296–307 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moretti, S., Patrone, F.: Cost allocation games with information costs. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 59, 419–434 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Myerson, R.B., Satterthwaite, M.A.: Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econ. Theor. 29, 265–281 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Roth, A.E.: The economist as engineer: game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70, 1341–1378 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16, 8–37 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the participants to the second workshop “Quantitative methods of group decision making” held at the Wroclaw School of Banking in November 2016 for useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vito Fragnelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Briata, F., Fragnelli, V. (2017). Free-Riding in Common Facility Sharing. In: Mercik, J. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10480. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70646-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70647-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics