Skip to main content

Objects Categorization on fMRI Data: Evidences for Feature-Map Representation of Objects in Human Brain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain Informatics (BI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10654))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1650 Accesses

Abstract

Brain imaging studies in humans have reported each object category was associated with different neural response pattern reflecting visual, structure or semantic attributes of visual appearance, and the representation of an object is distributed across a broader expanse of cortex rather than a specific region. These findings suggest the feature-map model of object representation. The present object categorization study provided another evidence for feature-map representation of objects. Linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to analyze the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data when subjects viewed four representative categories of objects (house, face, car and cat) to investigate the representation of different categories of objects in human brain. We designed 6 linear SVM classifiers to discriminate one category from the other one (1 vs. 1), 12 linear SVM classifiers to discriminate one category from other two categories (1 vs. 2), 3 linear SVM classifiers to discriminate two categories of objects from the other two categories (2 vs. 2). Results showed that objects with visually similar features have lower classification accuracy under all conditions, which may provide new evidences for the feature-map representation of different categories of objects in human brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gauthier, I.: What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex? Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 1–2 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Haxby, J., et al.: Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293(5539), 2425–2430 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hecaen, H., Angelergues, R.: Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). Arch. Neurol. 7(2), 92 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Assal, G., Favre, C., Anderes, J.: Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer. Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals. Revue Neurologique 140(10), 580 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmel, D., Bentin, S.: Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition 83(1), 1–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rossion, B., et al.: The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. NeuroReport 11(1), 69 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, J., et al.: The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. NeuroReport 11(02), 337 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., Chun, M.: The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17(11), 4302 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy, G., et al.: Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9(5), 605–610 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanwisher, N.: Domain specificity in face perception. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 759–763 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fodor, J.A.: The Modularity of Mind. MIT, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Downing, P.E., et al.: A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293(5539), 2470 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Epstein, R., Kanwisher, N.: A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392(6676), 598–601 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarr, I.G.M.J., et al.: Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat. Neurosci. 2(6), 569 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gauthier, I., et al.: Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 191–197 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tarr, M.J., Gauthier, I.: FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 764–770 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishai, A., et al.: Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Nat. Acad. Sci. 96, 9379–9384 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishai, A., et al.: The representation of objects in the human occipital and temporal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12(Supplement 2), 35–51 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I.: The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(6), 428–432 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chao, L.L., Haxby, J.V., Martin, A.: Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 913–919 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka, K.: Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 19(1), 109–139 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, H., et al.: Face-selective regions differ in their ability to classify facial expressions. NeuroImage 130, 77–90 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wegrzyn, M., et al.: Investigating the brain basis of facial expression perception using multi-voxel pattern analysis. Cortex 69, 131–140 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kragel, P.A., Labar, K.S.: Multivariate neural biomarkers of emotional states are categorically distinct. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10(11), 1437–1448 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cowen, A.S., Chun, M.M., Kuhl, B.A.: Neural portraits of perception: Reconstructing face images from evoked brain activity. NeuroImage 94(1), 12–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Song, S., et al.: Comparative study of SVM methods combined with voxel selection for object category classification on fMRI data. PLoS ONE 6(2), e17191 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by Young Scientist Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31300924), NSFC General program (61375116), the Fund of University of JiNan (XKY1508, XKY1408).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuehua Tong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Song, S., Zhang, J., Tong, Y. (2017). Objects Categorization on fMRI Data: Evidences for Feature-Map Representation of Objects in Human Brain. In: Zeng, Y., et al. Brain Informatics. BI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10654. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70772-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70772-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70771-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70772-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics