Skip to main content

Modeling a Peer Assessment Framework by Means of a Lazy Learning Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Technologies for Education (SETE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10676))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Peer-assessment entails, for students, a very beneficial learning activity, from a pedagogical point of view. The peer-evaluation can be performed over a variety of peer-produced resources, the principle being that the more articulated such resource is, the better. Here we focus, in particular, on the automated support to grading open answers, via a peer-evaluation-based approach, which is mediated by the (partial) grading work of the teacher, and produces a (partial, as well) automated grading. We propose to support such automated grading by means of a method based on the K-NN technique. This method is an alternative to a previously studied and implemented one, based on Bayesian Networks. Here we describe the new approach and provide the reader with a preliminary evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. In: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castellanos-Nieves, D., Fernandez-Breis, J., Valencia-Garcia, R., Martinez-Bejar, R., Iniesta-Moreno, M.: Semantic web technologies for supporting learning assessment. Inf. Sci. 181(9), 1517–1537 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Conati, C., Gartner, A., Vanlehn, K.: Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 12, 371–417 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. De Marsico, M., Sciarrone, F., Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: The impact of self- and peer grading on student learning. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13(4), 1085–1106 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Kechaï, N., Delozanne, É., Prévit, D., Grugeon, B., Chenevotot, F.: Evaluating the performance of a diagnosis system in school algebra. In: Leung, H., Popescu, E., Cao, Y., Lau, Rynson W.H., Nejdl, W. (eds.) ICWL 2011. LNCS, vol. 7048, pp. 263–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoshino, A., Nakagawa, H.: A real-time multiple-choice question generation for language testing - a preliminary study. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, pp. 17–20 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, B., Lu, J., Yao, J.-M., Zhu, Q.-M.: Automated essay scoring using the KNN algorithm. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Limongelli, C., Lombardi, M., Marani, A., Sciarrone, F.: A teacher model to speed up the process of building courses. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8005, pp. 434–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Limongelli, C., Lombardi, M., Marani, A., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M.: A recommendation module to help teachers build courses through the moodle learning management system. New Rev. Hypermed. Multimed. 2(1–2), 58–82 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metcalfe, J., Shimamura, A.P.: Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning, 1st edn. David McKay, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Palmer, K., Richardson, P.: On-line assessment and free-response input-a pedagogic and technical model for squaring the circle. In: Proceedings of 7th CAA Conference, pp. 289–300 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sadler, P.M., Good, E.: The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educ. Assess. 11(1), 1–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamanishi, K., Li, H.: Mining open answers in questionnaire data. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17, 58–63 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Temperini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Marsico, M., Sterbini, A., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M. (2017). Modeling a Peer Assessment Framework by Means of a Lazy Learning Approach. In: Huang, TC., Lau, R., Huang, YM., Spaniol, M., Yuen, CH. (eds) Emerging Technologies for Education. SETE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71084-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71084-6_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71083-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71084-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics