Abstract
Studies suggest that many search engine queries have local intent. We consider the evaluation of ranking functions important for such queries. The key challenge is to be able to determine the “best” ranking for a query, as this enables evaluation of the results of ranking functions. We propose a model that synthesizes a ranking of points of interest (PoI) for a given query using historical trips extracted from GPS data. To extract trips, we propose a novel PoI assignment method that makes use of distances and temporal information. We also propose a PageRank-based smoothing method to be able to answer queries for regions that are not covered well by trips. We report experimental results on a large GPS dataset that show that the proposed model is capable of capturing the visits of users to PoIs and of synthesizing rankings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvares LO, Bogorny V, Kuijpers B, de Macedo JAF, Moelans B, Vaisman A (2007) A model for enriching trajectories with semantic geographical information. In: SIGSPATIAL GIS’07, pp 22:1–22:8
Ashbrook D, Starner T (2003) Using GPS to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 7(5):275–286
Baeza-Yates RA, Ribeiro-Neto B (1999) Modern information retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co, Inc
Bhattacharya T, Kulik L, Bailey J (2012) Extracting significant places from mobile user GPS trajectories: A bearing change based approach. In: SIGSPATIAL GIS’12, pp 398–401
Bhattacharya T, Kulik L, Bailey J (2015) Automatically recognizing places of interest from unreliable GPS data using spatio-temporal density estimation and line intersections. Pervasive Mob Comput 19:86–107
Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: WWW’98, pp 107–117
Cao X, Chen L, Cong G, Jensen CS, Qu Q, Skovsgaard A, Wu D, Yiu ML (2012) Spatial keyword querying. In: ER ’12, pp 16–29
Cao X, Cong G, Jensen CS (2010) Mining significant semantic locations from GPS data. Proc VLDB Endow 3(1–2):1009–1020
Chen X, Bennett PN, Collins-Thompson K, Horvitz E (2013) Pairwise ranking aggregation in a crowdsourced setting. In: WSDM’13, pp 193–202
Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: KDD’96, pp 226–231
Fagin R, Kumar R, Mahdian M, Sivakumar D, Vee E (2004) Comparing partial rankings. SIAM J Discrete Math 20:47–58
Furletti B, Cintia P, Renso C, Spinsanti L (2013) Inferring human activities from GPS tracks. In: UrbComp’13, pp 5:1–5:8
Google: Understanding consumers’ local search behavior (2014). https://goo.gl/7TrZNl
Google: Annual search statistics (2016). https://goo.gl/fxTWZs
Gu Q, Sacharidis D, Mathioudakis M, Wang G (2017) Inferring venue visits from GPS trajectories. In: SIGSPATIAL GIS’17
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) Kernel smoothing methods. Springer, New York
Kang JH, Welbourne W, Stewart B, Borriello G (2004) Extracting places from traces of locations. In: WMASH’04, pp 110–118
Keles I, Saltenis S, Jensen CS (2015) Synthesis of partial rankings of points of interest using crowdsourcing. In: GIR’15, pp 15:1–15:10
Kleinberg JM (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J ACM 46(5):604–632. https://doi.org/10.1145/324133.324140
Kumar R, Mahdian M, Pang B, Tomkins A, Vassilvitskii S (2015) Driven by food: modeling geographic choice. In: WSDM’15, pp 213–222
Montoliu R, Blom J, Gatica-Perez D (2013) Discovering places of interest in everyday life from smartphone data. Multimedia Tools Appl 62(1):179–207
Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. In: TR 1999-66, Stanford InfoLab
Palma AT, Bogorny V, Kuijpers B, Alvares LO (2008) A clustering-based approach for discovering interesting places in trajectories. In: SAC’08, pp 863–868
Shaw B, Shea J, Sinha S, Hogue A (2013) Learning to rank for spatiotemporal search. In: WSDM’13, pp 717–726
Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: ACM’68, pp 517–524
Spinsanti L, Celli F, Renso C (2010) Where you stop is who you are: Understanding peoples’ activities. In: BMI’10, pp 38–52
Stoyanovich J, Jacob M, Gong X (2015) Analyzing crowd rankings. In: WebDB’15, pp 41–47
Yi J, Jin R, Jain S, Jain A (2013) Inferring users’ preferences from crowdsourced pairwise comparisons: A matrix completion approach. In: HCOMP’13, pp 207–215
Zheng Y, Zhang L, Xie X, Ma WY (2009) Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories. In: WWW’09, pp 791–800
Zhou C, Frankowski D, Ludford P, Shekhar S, Terveen L (2004) Discovering personal gazetteers: an interactive clustering approach. In: SIGSPATIAL GIS’04, pp 266–273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Keles, I., Jensen, C.S., Saltenis, S. (2018). Extracting Rankings for Spatial Keyword Queries from GPS Data. In: Kiefer, P., Huang, H., Van de Weghe, N., Raubal, M. (eds) Progress in Location Based Services 2018. LBS 2018. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71470-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71470-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71469-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71470-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)