Skip to main content

Evaluating Ad Hoc Teamwork Performance in Drop-In Player Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10642))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ad hoc teamwork has been introduced as a general challenge for AI and especially multiagent systems [16]. The goal is to enable autonomous agents to band together with previously unknown teammates towards a common goal: collaboration without pre-coordination. A long-term vision for ad hoc teamwork is to enable robots or other autonomous agents to exhibit the sort of flexibility and adaptability on complex tasks that people do, for example when they play games of “pick-up” basketball or soccer. As a testbed for ad hoc teamwork, autonomous robots have played in pick-up soccer games, called “drop-in player challenges”, at the international RoboCup competition. An open question is how best to evaluate ad hoc teamwork performance—how well agents are able to coordinate and collaborate with unknown teammates—of agents with different skill levels and abilities competing in drop-in player challenges. This paper presents new metrics for assessing ad hoc teamwork performance, specifically attempting to isolate an agent’s coordination and teamwork from its skill level, during drop-in player challenges. Additionally, the paper considers how to account for only a relatively small number of pick-up games being played when evaluating drop-in player challenge participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.robocup.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://simspark.sourceforge.net/.

  3. 3.

    http://www.ode.org/.

  4. 4.

    Full rules of the challenges can be found at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~AustinVilla/sim/3dsimulation/2015_dropin_challenge/.

  5. 5.

    Empirically we have found that the average goal difference when one team plays itself approaches 0 across many games.

References

  1. Barrett, S., Stone, P.: An analysis framework for ad hoc teamwork tasks. In: AAMAS 2012, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett, S., Stone, P., Kraus, S.: Empirical evaluation of ad hoc teamwork in the pursuit domain. In: AAMAS 2011, May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowling, M., McCracken, P.: Coordination and adaptation in impromptu teams. In: AAAI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elo, A.: The Rating of Chess Players, Past and Present. Arco Publishing, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Genter, K., Laue, T., Stone, P.: Benchmarking robot cooperation without pre-coordination in the robocup standard platform league drop-in player competition. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2015), September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Genter, K., Laue, T., Stone, P.: Three years of the robocup standard platform league drop-in player competition: creating and maintaining a large scale ad hoc teamwork robotics competition. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. (JAAMAS) 31(4), 790–820 (2017). Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosz, B., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group actions. Artif. Intell. 86, 269–368 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Herbrich, R., Minka, T., Graepel, T.: Trueskill™: a bayesian skill rating system. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 569–576. MIT Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horling, B., Lesser, V., Vincent, R., Wagner, T., Raja, A., Zhang, S., Decker, K., Garvey, A.: The TAEMS White Paper, January 1999

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, E., Browning, B., Dias, M.B., Argall, B., Veloso, M.M., Stentz, A.T.: Dynamically formed heterogeneous robot teams performing tightly-coordinated tasks. In: ICRA, pp. 570–575, May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liemhetcharat, S., Luo, Y.: Applying the synergy graph model to human basketball. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1695–1696 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liemhetcharat, S., Veloso, M.: Modeling mutual capabilities in heterogeneous teams for role assignment. In: IROS 2011, pp. 3638–3644 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacAlpine, P., Depinet, M., Liang, J., Stone, P.: UT Austin Villa: RoboCup 2014 3D simulation league competition and technical challenge champions. In: Bianchi, R.A.C., Akin, H.L., Ramamoorthy, S., Sugiura, K. (eds.) RoboCup 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8992, pp. 33–46. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18615-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. MacAlpine, P., Genter, K., Barrett, S., Stone, P.: The RoboCup 2013 drop-in player challenges: experiments in ad hoc teamwork. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  15. MacAlpine, P., Hanna, J., Liang, J., Stone, P.: UT Austin Villa: RoboCup 2015 3D simulation league competition and technical challenges champions. In: Almeida, L., Ji, J., Steinbauer, G., Luke, S. (eds.) RoboCup 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9513, pp. 118–131. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29339-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Stone, P., Kaminka, G.A., Kraus, S., Rosenschein, J.S.: Ad hoc autonomous agent teams: collaboration without pre-coordination. In: AAAI 2010, July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 7, 81–124 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, F., Zilberstein, S., Chen, X.: Online planning for ad hoc autonomous agent teams. In: IJCAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has taken place in the Learning Agents Research Group (LARG) at UT Austin. LARG research is supported in part by NSF (CNS-1330072, CNS-1305287, IIS-1637736, IIS-1651089), ONR (21C184-01), AFOSR (FA9550-14-1-0087), Raytheon, Toyota, AT&T, and Lockheed Martin. Peter Stone serves on the Board of Directors of, Cogitai, Inc. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Texas at Austin in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick MacAlpine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

MacAlpine, P., Stone, P. (2017). Evaluating Ad Hoc Teamwork Performance in Drop-In Player Challenges. In: Sukthankar, G., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. (eds) Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71681-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71682-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics