Skip to main content

The Strategy of Experts for Repeated Predictions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10660))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate the behavior of experts who seek to make predictions with maximum impact on an audience. At a known future time, a certain continuous random variable will be realized. A public prediction gradually converges to the outcome, and an expert has access to a more accurate prediction. We study when the expert should reveal his information, when his reward is based on a proper scoring rule (e.g., is proportional to the change in log-likelihood of the outcome).

In Azar et al. (2016), we analyzed the case where the expert may make a single prediction. In this paper, we analyze the case where the expert is allowed to revise previous predictions. This leads to a rather different set of dilemmas for the strategic expert. We find that it is optimal for the expert to always tell the truth, and to make a new prediction whenever he has a new signal. We characterize the expert’s expectation for his total reward, and show asymptotic limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Taking logs transforms a lognormal random walk into a Gaussian one.

  2. 2.

    When a normal variable with prior distribution \(N(0,\sigma _0^2)\) is sampled with known variance t at value \(x_t\), its Bayesian posterior distribution is normal with mean \(\frac{x_t/t}{1/\sigma _0^2+1/t}\) and variance \(\frac{1}{1/\sigma _0^2+1/t}\). Assuming \(\sigma _0^2 \gg T_{max} \ge t\), this simplifies to \(N(x_t,t)\).

  3. 3.

    Since the expert is better informed than the market, his prediction depends on his signal alone. This is formally proved in Proposition 1.

References

  • Armantier, O., Treich, N.: Eliciting beliefs: proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging. Eur. Econ. Rev. 62(2013), 17–40 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azar, Y., Ban, A., Mansour, Y.: When should an expert make a prediction? In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 125–142. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban, A., Azar, Y., Mansour, Y.: The Strategy of Experts for Repeated Predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.00537 [cs.GT] (2017)

  • Bayarri, M.J., DeGroot, M.H.: Optimal reporting of predictions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84(405), 214–222 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., Scholes, M.: The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econ. 81(3), 637 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brier, G.W.: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Weather Rev. 78(1950), 1–3 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Dimitrov, S., Sami, R., Reeves, D.M., Pennock, D.M., Hanson, R.D., Fortnow, L., Gonen, R.: Gaming prediction markets: equilibrium strategies with a market maker. Algorithmica 58(4), 930–969 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Pennock, D.M.: Designing markets for prediction. AI Mag. 31(4), 42–52 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Waggoner, B.: Informational substitutes. In: 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 239–247. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti, B.: La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 7, 1–68 (1937)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M.C., Roll, R.: The adjustment of stock prices to new information. Int. Econ. Rev. 10, 1–21 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J.: Rational decisions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 14(1), 107–114 (1952)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R.: Combinatorial information market design. Inf. Syst. Frontiers 5(1), 107–119 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P.A.: Combining expert judgments: a Bayesian approach. Manag. Sci. 23(7), 679–693 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviani, M., Sørensen, P.N.: The strategy of professional forecasting. J. Financ. Econ. 81(2), 441–466 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A.: Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Ind. Manag. Rev. 6, 41–49 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y.L.: The Multivariate Normal Distribution. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9655-0

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Ban .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ban, A., Azar, Y., Mansour, Y. (2017). The Strategy of Experts for Repeated Predictions. In: R. Devanur, N., Lu, P. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10660. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71923-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71924-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics