Skip to main content

Evaluating the Performance of Three Classification Methods in Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining (SCDM 2018)

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of the Parkinson’s disease is a challenging task that involves many physical, psychological and neurological examinations. The examinations include investigating a number of signs and symptoms, reviewing the medical history and checking the nervous system conditions of a patient. Recently, researchers use voice disorders to diagnose Parkinson’s disease patients. They extract features of a recorded human voice and apply classification methods to diagnosis this disease. In this paper, we apply a Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes and Neural Network classification methods for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The aim of this paper is to resolve the problem by evaluating the performance of the three methods. The objectives of the paper are to (i) implement three classification methods independently on a Parkinson’s dataset, and (ii) determine the best method among the three. The classification results show that the Decision Tree produces the highest accuracy rate of 91.63%, followed by the Neural Network, 91.01% and the Naïve Bayes produces the lowest accuracy rate of 89.46%. The results recommend using the Decision Tree or the Neural Network over the Naïve Bayes for datasets with similar properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S.: Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147, 195–197 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davie, C.A.: A review of Parkinson’s disease. Br. Med. Bull. 86(1), 109–127 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutherland, M., Dean, P.: What is Parkinson’s Disease? Neuro Challenges, Foundation for Parkinson’s. http://www.parkinsonsneurochallenge.org (2017). Accessed 08 June 2017

  4. Asuncion, A., Newman, D.: UCI machine learning repository. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/parkinsons (2007)

  5. Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Roberts, S.J., Costello, D.A., Moroz, I.M.: Exploiting nonlinear recurrence and fractal scaling properties for voice disorder detection. Biomed. Eng. Online 6(1), 23 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arjmandi, M.K., Pooyan, M.: An optimum algorithm in pathological voice quality assessment using wavelet-packet-based features, linear discriminant analysis and support vector machine. Biomed. Sign. Process. Control 7(1), 3–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gnanapriya, S., Suganya, R., Devi, G.S., Kumar, M.S.: Data mining concepts and techniques. Data Min. Knowl. Eng. 2(9), 256–263 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tatu, A., Albuquerque, G., Eisemann, M., Schneidewind, J., Theisel, H., Magnor, M., Keim, D.: Combining automated analysis and visualization techniques for effective exploration of high-dimensional data. In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology VAST 2009, pp. 59–66. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Das, R.: A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(2), 1568–1572 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Exarchos, T.P., Tzallas, A.T., Baga, D., Chaloglou, D., Fotiadis, D.I., Tsouli, S., Konitsiotis, S.: Using partial decision trees to predict Parkinson’s symptoms: a new approach for diagnosis and therapy in patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease. Comput. Biol. Med. 42(2), 195–204 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Can, M.: Neural networks to diagnose the Parkinson’s disease. SouthEast Eur. J. Soft Comput. 2(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammed, M.A., Ghani, M.K.A., Hamed, R.I., Mostafa, S.A., Ibrahim, D.A., Jameel, H.K., Alallah, A.H.: Solving vehicle routing problem by using improved K-nearest neighbor algorithm for best solution. J. Comput. Sci. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khaleefah, S.H., Nasrudin, M.F., Mostafa, S.A.: Fingerprinting of deformed paper images acquired by scanners. In: 2015 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), pp. 393–397. IEEE, Dec 2015

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammed, M.A., Gani, M.K.A., Hamed, R.I., Mostafa, S.A., Ahmad, M.S., Ibrahim, D.A.: Solving vehicle routing problem by using improved genetic algorithm for optimal solution. J. Comput. Sci. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, S.A., Vijayalakshmi, M.: Efficiency of decision trees in predicting student’s academic performance. In: The First International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications, CS and IT, vol. 2, pp. 335–343

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rennie, J.D., Shih, L., Teevan, J., Karger, D.R.: Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Machine Learning ICML, Vol. 3, pp. 616–623 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bahramirad, S., Mustapha, A., Eshraghi, M.: Classification of liver disease diagnosis: a comparative study. In: 2013 Second International Conference on Informatics and Applications (ICIA), pp. 42–46. IEEE, Sept 2013

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hossain, J., FazlidaMohdSani, N., Mustapha, A., SurianiAffendey, L.: Using feature selection as accuracy benchmarking in clinical data mining. J. Comput. Sci. 9(7), 883 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is sponsored by Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, ORICC, under Vot D004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salama A. Mostafa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mostafa, S.A., Mustapha, A., Khaleefah, S.H., Ahmad, M.S., Mohammed, M.A. (2018). Evaluating the Performance of Three Classification Methods in Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. In: Ghazali, R., Deris, M., Nawi, N., Abawajy, J. (eds) Recent Advances on Soft Computing and Data Mining. SCDM 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 700. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72550-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72550-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72549-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72550-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics