Abstract
Homophily - tendency for people to form social connections with similar others - is one of the key topics in social network analysis. It indicates to what extent people tend to be similar to their friends and in what dimensions. For the long time homophily was just an index of the social similarity, but for the recent years the interest for the homophily formation, dynamics and multidimensionality increased. In this paper we investigate the homophily in such social constructed behavior as food consumption and academic achievements. The study of body mass index in social network context reveals the presence of homophily, which means that persons with similar constitution are more likely to be interconnected with each other. Interestingly, that healthy food consumption has no impact on social network formation, but there is homophily based on fast food consumption. Thus, ‘bad habits’ are stronger forces for the social ties formation. This results show that social constructed behavior is an important component on the process of social network formation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Merton, R.K., et al.: Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom Control Mod. Soc. 18, 18–66 (1954)
Kandel, D.B.: Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. Am. J. Sociol. 84, 427–436 (1978)
Suitor, J., Keeton, S.: Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women’s support networks across a decade. Soc. Netw. 19, 51–62 (1997)
Newman, L., Dale, A.: Homophily and agency: creating effective sustainable development networks. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 9, 79–90 (2007)
Furman, W., Simon, V.A.: Homophily in adolescent romantic relationships. In: Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents, pp. 203–224 (2008)
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., Christakis, N.: Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using facebook.com. Soc. Netw. 30, 330–342 (2008)
Steglich, C., Snijders, T.A., Pearson, M.: Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol. Method. 40, 329–393 (2010)
Dokuka, S., Valeeva, D., Yudkevich, M.: Homophily evolution in online networks: Who is a good friend and when? In: Ignatov, D.I., Khachay, M.Y., Labunets, V.G., Loukachevitch, N., Nikolenko, S.I., Panchenko, A., Savchenko, A.V., Vorontsov, K. (eds.) AIST 2016. CCIS, vol. 661, pp. 91–99. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52920-2_9
Snijders, T.A., Van de Bunt, G.G., Steglich, C.E.: Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc. Netw. 32, 44–60 (2010)
Dokuka, S., Valeeva, D., Yudkevich, M.: The Diffusion of Academic Achievements: Social Selection and Influence in Student Networks (2015)
Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 370–379 (2007)
Becker, G.S.: Health as human capital: synthesis and extensions. Oxford Econ. Pap. 59, 379–410 (2007)
Freier, R., Schumann, M., Siedler, T.: The earnings returns to graduating with honors-evidence from law graduates. Labour Econ. 34, 39–50 (2015)
Gleason, P.M.: College student employment, academic progress, and postcollege labor market success. J. Student Financ. Aid 23, 5–14 (1993)
Jones, E.B., Jackson, J.D.: College grades and labor market rewards. J. Hum. Resour. 25, 253–266 (1990)
Rourke, B.P., Finlayson, M.A.J.: Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 6, 121–133 (1978)
Sirin, S.R.: Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev. Educ. Res. 75, 417–453 (2005)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Lomi, A., Snijders, T.A., Steglich, C.E., Torló, V.J.: Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Soc. Sci. Res. 40, 1506–1520 (2011)
Flashman, J.: Academic achievement and its impact on friend dynamics. Sociol. Educ. 85, 61–80 (2012)
Dokuka, S., Valeeva, D., Yudkevich, M.: Formation and evolution mechanisms in online network of students: the Vkontakte case. In: Khachay, M.Y., Konstantinova, N., Panchenko, A., Ignatov, D.I., Labunets, V.G. (eds.) AIST 2015. CCIS, vol. 542, pp. 263–274. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26123-2_26
Sacerdote, B.: Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Q. J. Econ. 116, 681–704 (2001)
Vaquero, L.M., Cebrian, M.: The rich club phenomenon in the classroom. Sci. Rep. 3 (2013)
Cohen-Cole, E., Fletcher, J.M.: Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic. J. Health Econ. 27, 1382–1387 (2008)
Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A.: Estimating peer effects on health in social networks: a response to Cohen-cole and Fletcher; Trogdon, Nonnemaker, Pais. J. Health Econ. 27, 1400 (2008)
De La Haye, K., Robins, G., Mohr, P., Wilson, C.: How physical activity shapes, and is shaped by, adolescent friendships. Soc. Sci. Med. 73, 719–728 (2011)
Mercken, L., Snijders, T.A., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E., De Vries, H.: Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Soc. Netw. 32, 72–81 (2010)
Quetelet, A.: Physique sociale, ou essai sur le développement des facultés de l’homme, vol. 2. C. Muquardt (1869)
Gouldner, A.W.: The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25, 161–178 (1960)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., Lusher, D.: An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29, 173–191 (2007)
Prell, C.: Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2012)
Harris, J.K., Carothers, B.J., Wald, L.M., Shelton, S.C., Leischow, S.J.: Interpersonal influence among public health leaders in the united states department of health and human services. J. Public Health Res. 1, 67 (2012)
Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G.J., Wittek, R.: Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Soc. Netw. 34, 193–205 (2012)
Team, R.C.: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013 (2014)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Maria Yudkevich for help and discussion. The financial support of the 5-100 Government Program and Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) is greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dokuka, S., Krekhovets, E., Priymak, M. (2018). Health, Grades and Friendship: How Socially Constructed Characteristics Influence the Social Network Structure. In: van der Aalst, W., et al. Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts. AIST 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10716. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73013-4_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73013-4_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73012-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73013-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)