Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been highlighted as a design material in the HCI community. This acknowledgement is a call for interaction designers to consider intelligence as a resource for design. While this view is valid and well-grounded, it brings with it a need to better understand how intelligence as a design material can be used in formgiving practices. This chapter seeks to address this need by suggesting a new approach that integrates AI in the designer’s toolkit. This approach considers intelligence as being part of, and expressed through, an object's character, hereby integrating artificial intelligence into a product's form. We describe and discuss this approach by presenting and reflecting on our experiences in a design course where students were asked to give form to intelligent everyday objects in three iterative design cycles. We discuss the implications of our approach and findings within the frame of third wave HCI.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allmendinger G, Lombreglia R (2005) Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harv Bus Rev 83(10):131–145
Amazon Echo (2017) https://www.amazon.com/dp/product/B00X4WHP5E. Last checked 14 Sept 2017
Apple HomePod (2017) https://www.apple.com/homepod/. Last checked 14 Sept 2017
Bergström J, Brendon C, Frigo A, Mazé R, Vallgårda A (2010) Becoming materials: material forms and forms of practice. Digital Creativity 21(3):155–172
Bødker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles (NordiCHI’06). ACM, New York, pp 1–8
Bødker S (2015) Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22(5):24–31. ACM, New York
Bødker S, Klokmose CN (2012) Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic conference on Human-Computer Interaction: making sense through design. ACM, New York, pp 448–457
Cila N, Giaccardi E, Tynan O’Mahony F, Speed C, Caldwell M (2015) Thing-centered narratives: a study of object personas. Paper presented at Research Network for Design Anthropology Seminar 3: Collaborative Formation of Issues (January 2015), Aarhus, Denmark
Cila N, Smit I, Giaccardi E, Kröse B (2017) Products as agents: metaphors for designing the products of the IoT age. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 448–459
Crilly N, Moultrie J, Clarkson PJ (2009) Shaping things: intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form. Des Stud 30(3):224–254. Design, Helsinki
Djajadiningrat T, Overbeeke K, Wensveen S (2002) But how, Donald, tell us how?: on the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM, New York, pp 285–291
Dourish P (2004) Where the action is. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Dourish P, Mazmanian M (2011) Media as material: information representations as material foundations for organizational practice. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on process organization studies, pp 92–xx
Dove G, Halskov K, Forlizzi J, Zimmerman J (2017) UX design innovation: challenges for working with machine learning as a design material. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 278–288
Evans M, Sommerville S (2007) Seeing is believing: the challenge of product semantics in the curriculum. In: Shaping the future, proceedings of the international conference on engineering and product design education, 13–14 Sept 2007, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Farooq U, Grudin JT (2016) Human-computer integration. Interactions 23(6):26–32
Ghajargar M (2017) Toward intelligent environments: supporting reflection with smart objects in the home. Interactions 24(4):60–62. ACM, New York
Giaccardi E (2015) Designing the connected everyday. Interactions 22(1):26–31
Giaccardi E, Cila N, Speed C, Caldwell M (2016) Thing ethnography: doing design research with non-humans. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on designing interactive systems. ACM, New York, pp 377–387
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Google Home (2017) https://madeby.google.com/home/. Last checked 14 Sept 2017
Halse J, Brandt E, Clark B, Binder T (2010) Rehearsing the future. The Danish Design School Press, København
Harrison S, Tatar D, Sengers P (2007) The three paradigms of HCI. In: Proceeding of CHI 2007. ACM, New York
Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57(2):243–259
Hoffman G, Ju W (2014) Designing robots with movement in mind. J Human-Robot Interact 3(1):89–122
Hoffman G, Kubat R, Breazeal C (2008) A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor. In: The 17th IEEE international symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008. RO-MAN 2008. IEEE, pp 354–359
Holmquist LE (2017) Intelligence on tap: artificial intelligence as a new design material. Interactions 24(4):28–33
WikiPedia Pixar’s Luxo ‘Junior’. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxo_Jr. Last checked 14 Sept 2017
Jacucci G, Spagnolli A, Freeman J, Gamberini L (2014) Symbiotic interaction: a critical definition and comparison to other human-computer paradigms. In: International workshop on symbiotic interaction. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 3–20
Janlert LE, Stolterman E (1997) The character of things. Des Stud 18(3):297–314
Janlert L-E, Stolterman E (2017) The meaning of interactivity—some proposals for definitions and measures. Human Comput Interact 32(3):103–138
Kaptelinin V, Nardi BA (2006) Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kortuem G, Kowsar F, Fitton D, Vasughi S (2010) Smart artifacts as building blocks for the internet of things. J Internet Comput IEEE 14(1):44–51
Krippendorff K (1989) Product semantics: a triangulation and four design theories. In: Väkevä S (ed) Product semantic ‘89. University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki
Krippendorff K (2006) The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. Taylor & Francis CRC, New York
Kuutti K, Bannon LJ (2014) The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 3543–3552
Laurel B (1997) Interface agents: metaphors with character. In: Friedman B (ed) Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 207–219
Licklider JC (1960) Man-computer symbiosis. IRE trans Hum Factors Electron 1:4–11
Lim YK, Stolterman E, Jung H, Donaldson J (2007) Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 239–254
Marenko B, van Allen P (2016) Animistic design: how to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman. Digital Creativity 27(1):52–70
McKim RH (1980) Thinking visually: a strategy manual for problem solving. Wadsworth, Belmont
Muller W (2001) Order and meaning in design. Lemma, Utrecht
Niess J, Diefenbach S (2016) Communication styles of interactive tools for self-improvement. Psychol Well Being 6(1):3
Norman DA (1994) How might people interact with agents. Commun ACM 37(7):68–71
Papanek V (1971) Design for the Real World: human ecology and social change. Pantheon Books, New York
Pasman G, Rozendaal M (2016) Exploring interaction styles through video. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering and product design education (E&PDE16), Aalborg, Denmark, 8th–9th September 2016
Petersen MG, Iversen OS, Krogh PG, Ludvigsen M (2004) Aesthetic Interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM, New York, pp 269–276
Pevsner N (1991) Pioneers of modern design: from William Morris to Walter Gropius. Penguin Books, London
Raizman D (2004) A history of modern design: graphics and products since the industrial revolution. Laurence King Publishing, London
Ramduny-Ellis D, Dix A, Evans M, Hare J, Gill S (2010) Physicality in design: an exploration. Des J 13(1):48–76
Reeves B, Nass C (1996) How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications and Cambridge university press, Stanford/Cambridge, MA, pp 3–18
Robles E, Wiberg M (2010) Texturing the material turn in interaction design. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. ACM, New York, pp 137–144
Rosner DK (2012) The material practices of collaboration. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 1155–1164
Ross PR, Wensveen SA (2010) Designing behavior in interaction: using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. Int J Des 4(2):3–13
Rozendaal MC (2016) Objects with intent: a new paradigm for interaction design. Interactions 23(3):62–65
Sabou M (2010) Smart artifacts: challenges for semantic web research, semantic web – interoperability. Usability Applicability 1:1–5
Schön DA (1984) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, vol 5126. Basic Books, New York
Siegman AW, Feldstein S (eds) (2014) Nonverbal behavior and communication. In: Psychology press, Oxford
Smets G, Overbeeke K, Gaver W (1994, April) Form-giving: expressing the nonobvious. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 79–84
Taylor AS (2009) Machine intelligence. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 2109–2118
Tholander J, Normark M, Rossitto C (2012) Understanding agency in interaction design materials. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 2499–2508
Vallgårda A (2014) Giving form to computational things: developing a practice of interaction design. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18(3):577–592
Vallgårda A, Redström J (2007) Computational composites. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 513–522
Verplank B (2009) Interaction design sketchbook: frameworks for designing interactive products and systems. https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/250a-fall-2004/IDSketchbok.pdf. Last access 14 Sept 2017
Vihma S (1995) Products as representations: a semiotic and aesthetic study of design products. University of Arts & Design, Helsinki
Wiberg M (2014) Methodology for materiality: interaction design research through a material lens. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18(3):625–636
Wiberg M (2018) The materiality of interaction: notes on the materials of interaction design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Wiberg M, Robles E (2010) Computational compositions: aesthetics, materials, and interaction design. Int J Des 4(2):65–76
Wiberg M, Ishii H, Dourish P, Vallgårda A, Kerridge T, Sundström P, Rosner D, Rolston M (2013) Materiality matters – experience materials. Interactions 20(2):54–57
Wooldridge M, Jennings NR (1995) Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowl Eng Rev 10(2):115–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rozendaal, M.C., Ghajargar, M., Pasman, G., Wiberg, M. (2018). Giving Form to Smart Objects: Exploring Intelligence as an Interaction Design Material. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 1 - Technologies. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73356-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73356-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73355-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73356-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)