Skip to main content

Method for Accessibility Assessment of Online Content Editors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018) (ICITS 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 721))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper defines a method for evaluating the accessibility of online content editors by considering Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) and part B of the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (ATAG 2.0). The method includes 63 accessibility features that should be met by the images, headings and tables, which are inserted through an online content editor. The compliance of these guidelines contributes to the creation of accessible content so that visually impaired people using assistive technologies can easily access the content. Furthermore, the results of this study provide criteria for those people who have the responsibility of selecting an accessible online content editor. The proposed method has made it possible to meet the objective set out in this research document and can be used to evaluate the accessibility of learning management systems and course management systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acosta, T., Luján-Mora, S.: Most common accessibility errors in websites of Ecuadorian universities. In: International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Science, INCISCOS, Quito, pp. 48–55 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luján-Mora, S.: Por qué es importante que la web sea accessible? In: El Impacto de las Nuevas Tecnologías (tics) en Discapacidad y Envejecimiento Activo, Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 94–110 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hassan Montero, Y.: Factores del diseño web orientado a la satisfacción y no-frustración de uso. Rev. Esp. Doc. Cient. 29, 239–257 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B.: Accessing e-learning systems via screen reader: an example. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 21–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Minin, H.C., Alemán, J.J., Sacramento, C., Trevisan, D.G.: A WYSIWYG editor to support accessible web content production. In: International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Los Angeles, pp. 221–230 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luján-Mora, S.: Web accessibility among the countries of the European union: a comparative study. Actual Probl. Sci. 1, 8–27 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Wide Web Consortium, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

  8. World Wide Web Consortium, Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/

  9. WebAIM: Screen Reader User Survey #2 Results. http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey2/

  10. López, J., Pascual, A., Menduiña, C., Granollers, T.: Methodology for identifying and solving accessibility related issues in web content management system environments. In: International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, Lyon, p. 32 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Wide Web Consortium, Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 1.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/

  12. Iglesias, A., Moreno, L., Martínez, P., Calvo, R.: Evaluating the accessibility of three open-source learning content management systems: a comparative study. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 22, 320–328 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calvo, R., Iglesias, A., Moreno, R.: Accessibility barriers for users of screen readers in the Moodle learning content management system. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 13, 315–327 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanchez-Gordon, S., Estévez, J., Luján-Mora, S.: Editor for accessible images in e-Learning platforms. In: 13th Web for All Conference, Montreal, pp. 1–2 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Web Accessibility Initiative: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) Overview. https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/atag.php

  16. Meyers, J.E., Bartee, J.W.: Improvements in the signing skills of hearing parents of deaf children. Am. Ann. Deaf 137, 257–260 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rocha, Á.: Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Inf. Rev. 36(3), 374–382 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tania Acosta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Acosta, T., Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Ullauri, L., Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Method for Accessibility Assessment of Online Content Editors. In: Rocha, Á., Guarda, T. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018). ICITS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 721. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73449-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73450-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics