Abstract
This study describes the problems of web accessibility, especially for people with disabilities, as external conditions can distort user behavior and limit the data that can be obtained. Several studies recommend combining some methods with each other to achieve better results. This article proposes a combined approach, with the application of automatic and heuristic tools to make websites more accessible. In this study, we apply the Web Site Accessibility Assessment Methodology (WCAG-EM) considered in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0). From the results, we conclude that most tested websites can achieve an acceptable level of compliance. We propose that future work can focus on optimizing this combined approach, also this study can serve as a guide to help develop more inclusive websites.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Batanero, C., Karhu, M., Holvikivi, J., Oton, S., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R.: A method to evaluate accessibility in e-learning education systems. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 556–560 (2014)
Bevan, N.: How you could benefit from using ISO standards. In: Extended Abstracts of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2503–2504 (2014)
Brajnik, G.: A comparative test of web accessibility evaluation methods. In: 10th International ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing, pp. 113–120 (2008)
Martín, E., Haya, P.A., Carro, R.M.: Adaptation technologies to support daily living for all. In: User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines, pp. 1–21. Springer (2013)
Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Evaluation of the web accessibility of higher-education websites. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–6 (2016)
Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Web accessibility polices of higher education institutions. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (2017)
Carreras, O.: Validators and tools for accessibility and usability consultancies. http://www.usableyaccesible.com/recurso_misvalidadores.php. Accessed: 20 Aug 2017
Cockton, G., Woolrych, A.: Understanding inspection methods: lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation. In: People and Computers XV Interaction without Frontiers, pp. 171–191. Springer (2001)
Debevc, M., Kozuh, I., Hauptman, S., Klembas, A., Lapuh, J.B., Holzinger, A.: Using WCAG 2.0 and heuristic evaluation to evaluate accessibility in educational web based pages. In: International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, pp. 197–207. Springer (2015)
Hassan, Y., Martín, F.J.: Web site heuristic evaluation guide. http://www.nosolousabilidad.com/articulos/heuristica.htm. Accessed: 10 Aug 2017
International Standard Organization, ISO/IEC 24751-3:2008: Information Technology - Individualized Adaptability and Accessibility in E-learning, Education and Training - Part 3: “Access for All” Digital Resource Description (2008)
Authors: Details omitted for double-blind, Fourth Author (2017)
Kreijns, C.J., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W.: The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educ. Technol. Soc. 5, 8–22 (2002)
Luján-Mora, S.: Accesibilidad web. http://accesibilidadweb.dlsi.ua.es/. Accessed: 16 Oct 2017
Luján-Mora, S., Masri, F.: Evaluation of web accessibility: a combined method. In: Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies, Information Science Reference, pp. 314–331 (2002)
Mascaraque, E.S.: Herramientas para la evaluación de la accesibilidad Web [tools for the evaluation of web accessibility]. Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información 32, 245–266 (2009)
Paddison, C., Englefield, P.: Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context. In: ACM International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Computers and the Physically Handicapped No. 73–74, pp. 126–133 (2003)
Rayan, A., Dadoul, A.M., Jabareen, H., Sulieman, Z., Alzayyat, A., Baker, O.: Internet use among university students in south west bank: prevalence, advantages and disadvantages, and association with psychological health. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 15(1), 118–129 (2017)
WebAIM, Web Accessibility in Mind. Checklist. http://webaim.org/standards/wcag/checklist. Accessed: 16 Oct 2017
W3C, Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/#procedure, W3C Working Group Note, 10 July 2014. Accessed: 16 Oct 2017
World Wide Web Consortium, W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed: 16 Oct 2017
World Wide Web Consortium, W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Accessed: 16 Oct 2017
Rocha, Á.: Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Inf. Rev. 36(3), 374–382 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Acosta-Vargas, P., Luján-Mora, S., Acosta, T., Salvador-Ullauri, L. (2018). Toward a Combined Method for Evaluation of Web Accessibility. In: Rocha, Á., Guarda, T. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018). ICITS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 721. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_57
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73449-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73450-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)