Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 721))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2412 Accesses

Abstract

This descriptive research aims to explore the student perceptions about technology and their resilience when they develop mathematical problems through digital technologies. The population was 19 students, who had allowed to use geogebra software and matrixcalc application to verify problem solving. The study is supported by the theories of self-determination, connectivism and social construction of knowledge. The methodology is a combination of proposals of Hattie et al. named by [4, 6] and of the authors. A survey with a reliability coefficient of 0.81 was distributed to students, obtaining that more than half of them perceive themselves as capable of achieving their goals, maintaining their sense of humor, feeling the family support, controlling the development of activities, considering the authorized programs that are easy to use, useful and reliable. So, the academic strategy used favors the development of academic resilience, which is consistent with the postulates of Vaquero [9].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nazihatulhasanah, A., Nurbiha, A.: The effects of GeoGebra on students achievement. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 172, 208–214 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozkurt, G., Ruthven, K.: Classroom-based professional expertise: a mathematics teacher’s practice with technology. Educ. Stud. Math. 94, 309–328 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olsson, J.: The contribution of reasoning to the utilization of feedback from software when solving mathematical problems. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 1, 1–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matzenberger, J.: A novel approach to exploring the concept of resilience and principal drivers in a learning environment. Multicult. Educ. Technol. J. 7, 192–206 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Narciss, S.: Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model. Digit. Educ. Rev. 23, 1–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Faber, J.M., Luyten, H., Visscher, A.J.: The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: results of a randomized experiment. Comput. Educ. 106, 83–96 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Savolainen, T., Ikonen, M., Nurmenniemi, H.: Trust and resilience in entrepreneurial perspective: empirical findings from the developments in entrepreneurs’ stories. In: 11th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Aaltio, liris and Tunkkari-Eskelinen, Minna, pp. 726–733 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jülich, S.: Towards a local-level resilience composite index: introducing different degrees of indicator quantification. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 8, 91–99 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaquero, E., Urrea, A., Mundet, A.: Promoting resilience through technology, art and a child rights-based approach. Rev. Cercet. Interv. Soc. 45, 144–159 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coronado-Hijón, A.: Academic resilience: a transcultural perspective. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 237, 594–598 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeHann, C., Hirai, T., Ryan, R.: Nussbaum’s capabilities and self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs: relating some fundamentals of human wellness. J. Happiness Stud. 17, 2037–2040 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Skinner, E., Pitzer, J.: Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In: Christenson, S.L., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, vol. 1, pp. 21–44. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Durairaj, K., Umar, I.: A proposed conceptual framework in measuring social interaction and knowledge construction level in asynchronous forum among university students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 176, 451–457 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Song, S., Doll, B., Marth, K.: Classroom resilience: practical assessment for intervention. In: Prince-Embury, S., Saklofske, D.H. (eds.) Resilience in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: 61 Translating Research into Practice. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality, vol. 1, pp. 61–72. Springer Science + Business Media, New York (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Maggio, I., Ginevra, M., Nota, L., Soresi, S.: Development and validation of an instrument to assess future orientation and resilience in adolescence. J. Adolesc. 51, 114–122 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, S.: Integrating cognitive antecedents into TAM to explain mobile banking behavioral intention: a SEM-neural network modeling. Inf. Syst. Front. 1, 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Almaiah, M., Jalil, M., Man, M.: Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. J. Comput. Educ. 3, 453–485 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bazelais, P., Doleck, T., Lemay, D.J.: Investigating the predictive power of TAM: a case study. of CEGEP students’ intentions to use online learning technologies. Educ. Inf. Technol. 1, 1–19 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ngai, E.W.T., Poon, J.K.L., Chan, Y.H.C.: Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Comput. Educ. 48, 250–267 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Leiva, F.: Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: the moderating effect of age. Comput. Hum. Behav. 35, 464–478 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pulgar, L.: Factores de Resiliencia presentes en estudiantes de la Universidad del Bío Bío, sede Chillán. http://cybertesis.ubiobio.cl/tesis/2010/pulgar_l/doc/pulgar_l.pdf

  23. Broche, Y., Rodriguez, B., Pérez, S., Santaella, G., Díaz, A., Hernández, A., Blanco, Y.: Escala de Resiliencia Connor y Davidson (CD-Risk). In: Feijóo, S. (eds.) Validación de Instrumentos Psicológicos: Criterios Básicos, vol. 1, pp. 71–75 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, M.-C.Yang, F.: An empirical investigation of habitual usage and past usage on technology acceptance evaluations and continuance intention. ACM SIGMIS Database 39, 48–73 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Guerra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guerra, L., Rivero, D., Arciniegas, S., Quishpe, S. (2018). Digital Feedback and Academic Resilience. In: Rocha, Á., Guarda, T. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology & Systems (ICITS 2018). ICITS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 721. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_95

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_95

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73449-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73450-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics