Skip to main content

Smart Palletisation: Cognitive Ergonomics in Augmented Reality Based Palletising

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 722))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Palletisation is recognized as a central logistics process which largely depends on employee’s performance and expertise. To assess potential advantages of augmented reality (AR) in palletisation, an AR device was compared with a conventional paper-based pick list and a tablet computer. Usability measures show that the usability of the tablet computer surpassed the AR device and the pick list, whereas task load measures suggests that the AR device provides the less strenuous method to assist participants in palletisation. Thus, we conclude that AR devices are appropriate to assist logistic workers in palletising, however usability has to be improved considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Microsoft HoloLens (Release date: 2016). Online: www.wired.com/2015/01/microsoft-hands-on/.

References

  1. Lutter, T., Meinecke, C., Tropf, T., Böhm, K., Esser, R.: Zukunft der Consumer Technology – 2017, Marktentwicklung, Trends, Mediennutzung, Technologien, Geschäftsmodelle. Bitkom, Berlin (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Slotta, J.: Tangible and embodied interactions for learning. In: Gunstone, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Science Education, pp. 1017–1019. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Peddie, J.: Augmented Reality, p. 1. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Reif, R., Walch, D.: Augmented & virtual reality applications in the field of logistics. In: The Visual Computer, vol. 24, pp. 987–994. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Günthner, W.: Intralogistik im Dialog mit Forschung und Lehre. In: Arnold, D. (ed.) Intralogistik. Potentiale, Perspektiven, Prognosen, pp. 239–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kretschmer, V., Spee, D., Rinkenauer, G.: Der Mensch im Fokus: Kognitive Ergonomie in der Intralogistik. Fraunhofer-Institut für Materialfluss und Logistik IML. Jahresbericht 2016, pp. 60–61. Griebsch & Rochol Druck GmbH, Hamm (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arghavania, J., Abdou, G.: 3D volumetric pallet-loading optimisation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 11, 425–429 (1996). Springer, Newark

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adsavakulchai, S.: Optimization of pallet management for transportation efficiently. Int. J. Manag. Sci. 1, 43–46 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kretschmer, V., Eichler, A., Rinkenauer, G., Spee, D.: Focus on the human being: cognitive ergonomics in intralogistics. Logist. J. Proc. 2017, 1–6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rammelmeier, T., Galka, S., Günthner, W.A.: Fehlervermeidung in der Kommissionierung. Logist. J. 2012, 1–8 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rinkenauer, G., Kretschmer, V., Kreutzfeldt, M.: Kognitive Ergonomie in der Intralogistik. In: Future Challenges in Logistics and Supply Chain Management, vol. 2. Fraunhofer IML, Dortmund (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart, S.G: NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooke, J.: SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Organization For Standardization: ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on Usability. ISO, Freiburg i.B. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usability Stud. 8, 29–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was founded by the »Centre of Excellence for Logistics and IT« and the »Innovationlab Hybrid Services in Logistics«. We thank Friederike Hering for supporting us by the conduction of the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Kretschmer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kretschmer, V., Plewan, T., Rinkenauer, G., Maettig, B. (2018). Smart Palletisation: Cognitive Ergonomics in Augmented Reality Based Palletising. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds) Intelligent Human Systems Integration. IHSI 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 722. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73887-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73888-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics