Skip to main content

A Visualization of Human Physical Risks in Manufacturing Processes Using BPMN

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 308))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process models are schematic representations of business processes and support analysis for process redesign. A process model may be enhanced with additional information to further improve its analytical value (e.g. costs, throughput times, etc.). To support analysis of human factors in manufacturing processes, this paper introduces a new extension that visualizes human physical risks (such as heavy lifting or repetitive work). An existing human risk analysis method is integrated with the activity elements of BPMN. This integration facilitates a process wide risk analysis of occupational risk factors. Based on this graphical representation, users can see where in the process workers may encounter physical risks that should be mitigated through process redesign. This paper reports on the systematic design of a conceptual solution which is implemented in MS Visio and then applied and evaluated in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allweyer, T.: BPMN 2.0: Introduction to the Standard for Business Process Modeling. BoD Books on Demand, Norderstedt (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., Vaca Ruiz, C.K.: Combining social web and BPM for improving enterprise performances: the BPM4 people approach to social BPM. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 223–226. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braun, R., Esswein, W.: Classification of domain-specific BPMN extensions. In: Frank, U., Loucopoulos, P., Pastor, Ó., Petrounias, I. (eds.) PoEM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 197, pp. 42–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45501-2_4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braun, R., Schlieter, H., Burwitz, M., Esswein, W.: BPMN4CP: design and implementation of a BPMN extension for clinical pathways. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 9–16. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: an introduction to the standard. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34(1), 124–134 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christ, R.E.: Review and analysis of color coding research for visual displays. Hum. Factors 17(6), 542–570 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, vol. 1, p. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1921, pp. 40–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45394-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffith, L.E., Shannon, H.S., et al.: Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain. Am. J. Public Health 102(2), 309–318 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. HORSE: HORSE Project (2016). http://www.horse-project.eu/. Accessed 07 Oct 2016

  13. IEA: Denition and Domains of Ergonomics (2016). http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2016

  14. Kahya, E.: The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 37(6), 515–523 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lodhi, A., Küppen, V., Saake, G.: An extension of BPMN meta-model for evaluation of business processes. Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Comput. Sci. 43(1), 27–34 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Magnani, M., Montesi, D.: BPMN: how much does it cost? An incremental approach. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 80–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Moody, D.L.: The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: ECIS 2003 Proceedings, p. 79 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moody, D.: What makes a good diagram? Improving the cognitive effectiveness of diagrams in is development. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds.) Advances in Information Systems Development, pp. 481–492. Springer, Boston (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Müller, R., Rogge-Solti, A.: BPMN for healthcare processes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neumann, W.P., Winkel, J., Medbo, L., Magneberg, R., Mathiassen, S.E.: Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics: a case study of parallel and serial flow strategies. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26(8), 904–923 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Neumann, W.P., Dul, J.: Human factors: spanning the gap between OM and HRM. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 30(9), 923–950 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  23. OMG: Notation (BPMN) version 2.0. Object Management Group (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ould, M.A., Ould, M.A.: Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement, vol. 598. Wiley, Chichester (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paquet, V., Lin, L.: An integrated methodology for manufacturing systems design using manual and computer simulation. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 13(1), 19–40 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., et al.: The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), pp. 83–106 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Petre, M.: Why looking isn’t always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming. Commun. ACM 38(6), 33–44 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Polderdijk, M.: Extending BPMN for analysis of human physical risk factors in manufacturing processes. Master thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2017). http://is.ieis.tue.nl/staff/ivanderfeesten/Papers/TAProViz2017/

  29. Stanton, N.A., Hedge, A., et al. (eds.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. TNO: Checklist Physical Load (2012). https://www.fysiekebelastingbeoordelen.tno.nl. Accessed 04 Oct 2016

  31. Thomas Regout International (2016). http://www.thomasregout-telescopicslides.com/. Accessed: 06 Oct 2016

  32. Van Der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Eng. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ware, C.: Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zor, S., Leymann, F., Schumm, D.: A proposal of BPMN extensions for the manufacturing domain. In: Proceedings of 44th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is conducted in the context of the HORSE project [12]. The HORSE project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 680734. The authors want to thank M. Douwes for her valuable feedback on early versions of the tool, and R. Keulen for the opportunity to apply this work in practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Vanderfeesten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Polderdijk, M. et al. (2018). A Visualization of Human Physical Risks in Manufacturing Processes Using BPMN. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74029-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74030-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics