Abstract
Process models are schematic representations of business processes and support analysis for process redesign. A process model may be enhanced with additional information to further improve its analytical value (e.g. costs, throughput times, etc.). To support analysis of human factors in manufacturing processes, this paper introduces a new extension that visualizes human physical risks (such as heavy lifting or repetitive work). An existing human risk analysis method is integrated with the activity elements of BPMN. This integration facilitates a process wide risk analysis of occupational risk factors. Based on this graphical representation, users can see where in the process workers may encounter physical risks that should be mitigated through process redesign. This paper reports on the systematic design of a conceptual solution which is implemented in MS Visio and then applied and evaluated in practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allweyer, T.: BPMN 2.0: Introduction to the Standard for Business Process Modeling. BoD Books on Demand, Norderstedt (2016)
Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., Vaca Ruiz, C.K.: Combining social web and BPM for improving enterprise performances: the BPM4 people approach to social BPM. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 223–226. ACM (2012)
Braun, R., Esswein, W.: Classification of domain-specific BPMN extensions. In: Frank, U., Loucopoulos, P., Pastor, Ó., Petrounias, I. (eds.) PoEM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 197, pp. 42–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45501-2_4
Braun, R., Schlieter, H., Burwitz, M., Esswein, W.: BPMN4CP: design and implementation of a BPMN extension for clinical pathways. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 9–16. IEEE (2014)
Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: an introduction to the standard. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34(1), 124–134 (2012)
Christ, R.E.: Review and analysis of color coding research for visual displays. Hum. Factors 17(6), 542–570 (1975)
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management, vol. 1, p. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: Liddle, S.W., Mayr, H.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1921, pp. 40–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45394-6_5
Griffith, L.E., Shannon, H.S., et al.: Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain. Am. J. Public Health 102(2), 309–318 (2012)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28, 75–105 (2004)
HORSE: HORSE Project (2016). http://www.horse-project.eu/. Accessed 07 Oct 2016
IEA: Denition and Domains of Ergonomics (2016). http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2016
Kahya, E.: The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 37(6), 515–523 (2007)
Lodhi, A., Küppen, V., Saake, G.: An extension of BPMN meta-model for evaluation of business processes. Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Comput. Sci. 43(1), 27–34 (2011)
Magnani, M., Montesi, D.: BPMN: how much does it cost? An incremental approach. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 80–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_6
Moody, D.L.: The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: ECIS 2003 Proceedings, p. 79 (2003)
Moody, D.: What makes a good diagram? Improving the cognitive effectiveness of diagrams in is development. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds.) Advances in Information Systems Development, pp. 481–492. Springer, Boston (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70802-7_40
Müller, R., Rogge-Solti, A.: BPMN for healthcare processes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition (2011)
Neumann, W.P., Winkel, J., Medbo, L., Magneberg, R., Mathiassen, S.E.: Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics: a case study of parallel and serial flow strategies. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26(8), 904–923 (2006)
Neumann, W.P., Dul, J.: Human factors: spanning the gap between OM and HRM. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 30(9), 923–950 (2010)
Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)
OMG: Notation (BPMN) version 2.0. Object Management Group (2011)
Ould, M.A., Ould, M.A.: Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement, vol. 598. Wiley, Chichester (1995)
Paquet, V., Lin, L.: An integrated methodology for manufacturing systems design using manual and computer simulation. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 13(1), 19–40 (2003)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., et al.: The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), pp. 83–106 (2006)
Petre, M.: Why looking isn’t always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming. Commun. ACM 38(6), 33–44 (1995)
Polderdijk, M.: Extending BPMN for analysis of human physical risk factors in manufacturing processes. Master thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2017). http://is.ieis.tue.nl/staff/ivanderfeesten/Papers/TAProViz2017/
Stanton, N.A., Hedge, A., et al. (eds.): Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)
TNO: Checklist Physical Load (2012). https://www.fysiekebelastingbeoordelen.tno.nl. Accessed 04 Oct 2016
Thomas Regout International (2016). http://www.thomasregout-telescopicslides.com/. Accessed: 06 Oct 2016
Van Der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process management: a comprehensive survey. ISRN Software Eng. (2013)
Ware, C.: Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)
Zor, S., Leymann, F., Schumm, D.: A proposal of BPMN extensions for the manufacturing domain. In: Proceedings of 44th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems, June 2011
Acknowledgements
This research is conducted in the context of the HORSE project [12]. The HORSE project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 680734. The authors want to thank M. Douwes for her valuable feedback on early versions of the tool, and R. Keulen for the opportunity to apply this work in practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Polderdijk, M. et al. (2018). A Visualization of Human Physical Risks in Manufacturing Processes Using BPMN. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74029-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74030-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)