Skip to main content

News, Fake News, and Critical Authority

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Literacy in the Workplace (ECIL 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 810))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this proposed work is to present a theoretically and methodologically sound grounding for the critical apprehension of what constitutes authoritative news and news sources. The presentation will demonstrate clearly that there are variations in reports of news: intentionally objective news items (“intentionally” in that there is a deliberate attempt at objective reporting), unintentional error in news items (“unintentionally” mistaken), and intentionally false news items (“intentionally” in that there is a deliberate effort to deceive readers). The proposed work will focus on the first and third of the possibilities. Within the functioning of information literacy, it is argued, there is an obligation to recognize the intentionalities for what they are—objective reporting and efforts to deceive. Ultimately, the presentation will suggest ways to realize that obligation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 155.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sloman, S., Fernbach, P.: The Knowledge Illusion. Riverhead Books, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allcorn, S., Stein, H.: The post-factual world of the 2016 American presidential election: the good, the bad, and the deplorable. J. Psychohist. 44, 310–318 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cerf, V.G.: Can liberty survive the digital age? Commun. ACM 60, 7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loertscher, D.V.: Fake news, a rant, and new standards. Teach. Libr. 44, 44–45 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, J.: A Process Philosophy of Signs. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider, F.: A rough guide to the theory of semiotics (2013). http://www.politicseastasia.com/studying/guide-to-the-theory-of-semiotics/

  7. Deely, J.: Introducing Semiotic: Its History and Doctrine. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893–1913). Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grice, H.P.: Meaning. Philos. Rev. 66, 377–388 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Budd, J.M.: Phenomenology and information studies. J. Doc. 61, 44–59 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barthes, R.: The Semiotic Challenge. University of California Press, Berkeley (1994). Trans. by, R. Howard

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucault, M.: The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books, New York (1972). Trans. by A.M.S. Smith

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raber, D., Budd, J.M.: Information as sign: semiotics and information science. J. Doc. 59, 22–507 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanford University.: evaluating information: the cornerstone of civic online reasoning (2016). https://sheg.stanford.edu/upload/V3LessonPlans/Executive%20Summary%2011.21.16.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine N. Stewart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Budd, J.M., Stewart, K.N. (2018). News, Fake News, and Critical Authority. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds) Information Literacy in the Workplace. ECIL 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 810. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74333-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74334-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics