Abstract
The work presented in this paper is part of a global approach providing answers to solve the problems encountered by the Moroccan education system [2], especially in the primary school, as well as eradicating illiteracy. The article deals with the choice of the most suitable and efficient pedagogical reading skills method for young and illiterate public. The paper presents several pedagogical methods and focuses on their four most important (Phonics Method, Global Method, Mixed Method and Montessori Method). In order to choose the right reading teaching method, the paper proposes a study of a theoretical approach, based on the application of the decision making method AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) one of the MCDM/A methods (Multi-criteria decision-making and analysis methods).
The methodological context is based on an identification and representation of the most appropriate criteria and sub-criteria for the four pedagogical methods studied in order to rank them. Complementary research is in progress by the authors completes the work presented here, which focuses on other learning (calculation, comprehension, written and oral expression), including the integration of ICT (Information and communications technology) and multimedia.
An illustration of the application of this framework is also presented here.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The data used are derived from a literature investigation on the basis of coherence.
References
N’Namdi, K.A.: Guide to teaching reading at the primary school level. UNESCO, Paris (2005)
Abadzi, H.: Instructional time loss and local-level governance. Prospects 37, 3–16 (2007)
Aissanou, F.: Décisions multicritères dans les réseaux de télécommunication autonomes. Paris: Thèse numéro: 2012TELE0019 (2012)
Bougroum, M., Ibourk, A., Löwenthal, P.: La politique d’alphabétisation au Maroc: quel rôle pour le secteur associatif? Mondes en développement, No. 134, pp. 63–77, February 2006. https://doi.org/10.3917/med.134.0063, https://www.cairn.info/revue-mondes-en-developpement-2006-2-page-63.htm
Bowman, F.L.: The Influence of Montessori-Based Literacy Instruction and Methods on Reading Achievement of Students in Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Seton Hall University: Doctorat of Education (2013)
Brighelli, J.-P.: La Fabrique du crétin: la mort programmée de l’école. Jean-Claude Gawsewitch, Paris (2005)
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y.: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. In: SAGE, éd. 4ème, Los Angeles (2011)
Diabagaté, A., Azmani, A., El Harzli, M.: The choice of the best proposal in tendering with AHP method: case of procurement of IT master plan’s realization. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJITCS) 7(12), 1–11 (2015)
El Haji, E., Azmani, A., El Harzli, M.: Using AHP method for educational and vocational guidance. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJITCS) 9(12), 9–17 (2017)
Gombert, J.-É., Colé, P., Valdois, S., Goigoux, R., Mousty, P., Fayol, M.: Enseigner la lecture au cycle 2. Nathan Université (2000)
Grosselin, A.: De l’enseignement de la lecture par la méthode phonomimique. Revue pédagogique 2(2), 517–530 (1881)
Hamouchi, A., Errougui, I., Boulaassass, B.: L’enseignement au Maroc, de l’approche par objectifs à l’approche par compétences: points de vue des enseignantes et enseignants. RADISMA, N°8 (2012)
Jamet, E.: Comment lisons-nous? Sci. Hum. (82), 20–25 (1998)
Janet, P., Dumas, G.: Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique. Presse universitaires de France-Paris (1926)
Lahby, M., Cherkaoui, L., Adib, A.: An intelligent network selection strategy based on MADM methods in heterogeneous networks. Int. J. Wirel. Mob. Netw. 4(1), 83–96 (2012)
Lai, W., Han-lun, L., Qi, L., Jing-yi, C., Yi-jiao, C.: Study and implementation of fire sites planning based on GIS and AHP. Procedia Eng. 11, 486–495 (2011). 1(1)
Sadjadi, S.J., Habibian, M., Khaledi, V.: A multi-objective decision making approach for solving quadratic multiple response surface problems. Math. Sci. 3(32), 1595–1606 (2008)
Saaty, R.W.: The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math. Model. 9(3), 161–176 (1987)
Saaty, T.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)
UNESCO: Enseigner et apprendre: Atteindre la qualité pour tous. UNESCO, Paris, April 2013
UNESCO: Le rapport mondial de suivi sur l’EPT Education pour tous 2000–2015: Progrès et enjeux. France (2015)
UNESCO: Rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation. L’éducation pour les peuples et la planète: Créer des avenirs durables pour tous, Paris (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chaabi, H., Azmani, A., Azmani, A. (2018). Using Decision Making AHP Method for the Choice of the Best Pedagogical Method for Developing Reading Skills for Young and Illiterate Public. In: Ben Ahmed, M., Boudhir, A. (eds) Innovations in Smart Cities and Applications. SCAMS 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74500-8_64
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74500-8_64
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74499-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74500-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)