Skip to main content

Controlling Production Variances in Complex Business Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10729))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Products can consist of many sub-assemblies and small disturbances in the process can lead to larger negative effects downstream. Such variances in production are a challenge from a quality control and operational risk management perspective but also it distorts the assurance processes from an auditing perspective. To control production effectively waste needs to be taken into account in normative models, but this is complicated by cumulative effects. We developed an analytical normative model based on the bill of material, that derives the rejection rates from the underlying processes without direct measurement. The model enables improved analysis and prediction. If the rejection rate is not taken into account the function of the bill of material as a reference model deteriorates and therefore output measures become more opaque and harder to verify. As a consequence it is extremely difficult or even impossible to assess efficiency and effectiveness of operations. Secondly it is impossible to judge whether net salable assets represent the correct amount and finally it is impossible to assert whether the operations do comply to company standards and applicable laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 107.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baumol, W.J., Wolff, E.N.: A key role for input-output analysis in policy design. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 24(1), 93–113 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boritz, J.E.: Is practitioners’ views on core concepts of information integrity. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 260–279 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christiaanse, R., Griffioen, P., Hulstijn, J.: Adaptive normative modelling: a case study in the public-transport domain. In: Janssen, M., Mäntymäki, M., Hidders, J., Klievink, B., Lamersdorf, W., van Loenen, B., Zuiderwijk, A. (eds.) I3E 2015. LNCS, vol. 9373, pp. 423–434. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25013-7_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Christiaanse, R., Griffioen, P., Hulstijn, J.: Reliability of electronic evidence: an application for model-based auditing. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2015, pp. 43–52. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. COSO: Internal control - integrated framework. Report, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. COSO: Enterprise risk management - integrated framework. Report, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. COSO: Guidance on monitoring internal control systems. Report, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, J., Edgar, T., Porter, J., Bernaden, J., Sarli, M.: Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance. Comput. Chem. Eng. 47(20), 145–156 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elmaghraby, S.E.: A note on the ‘explosion’ and ‘netting’ problems in the planning of materials requirements. Oper. Res. 11(4), 530–535 (1963)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Engell, S.: Feedback control for optimal process operation. J. Process Control 17, 203–219 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobs, F.R., Weston Jr., F.C.: Enterprise resource planning (ERP)-a brief history. J. Oper. Manag. 25, 357–363 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leontief, W.: Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 52(3), 262–271 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, C.-M., Chen, L.S., Romanowski, R.M.: An electronic material flow control system for improving production efficiency in integrated-circuit assembly industry. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 42, 348–362 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Merchant, K.A.: Modern Management Control Systems, Text and Cases. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merchant, K.A.: The control function of management. Sloan Manag. Rev. 23(Summer), 43–55 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moffitt, K.C., Vasarhelyi, M.A.: Accounting information systems in an age of big data. J. Inf. Syst. 27(2), 1–19 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rachuri, S.: Smart manufacturing systems design and analysis. Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simons, R.: Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Starreveld, R.W., de Mare, H.B., Joëls, E.J.: Bestuurlijke informatieverzorging, volume deel 1: Algemene grondslagen, 2nd edn. Samson Uitgeverij, Aplhen aan den Rijn/Brussel (1988). (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strang, G.: Linear Algebra and its Applications. Brooks Cole, Belmont (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Strong, D.M., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y.: Data quality in context. Commun. ACM 40(5), 103–110 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weigand, H., Elsas, P.: Model-based auditing using REA. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 13(3), 287–310 (2012). 2011 Research Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research in this paper was supported by the SATIN research project, funded by NWO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Christiaanse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Griffioen, P., Christiaanse, R., Hulstijn, J. (2018). Controlling Production Variances in Complex Business Processes. In: Cerone, A., Roveri, M. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10729. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74781-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74781-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74780-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74781-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics