Abstract
Flight 4.0 represents a rapidly expanding research domain that brings IoT (Internet of Things) technology in the aviation domain. Based on various engineering domains such as Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and embedded systems, Flight 4.0 systems are characterized by high degree of heterogeneity regarding various perspectives, such as communication, hardware, and software solutions. Additionally, in order to be well accepted by the end users, it is of paramount importance to exhibit high degree of configurability and flexibility so as to be applicable in diverse application scenarios. Aiming to address such objectives, this chapter attempts to identify the main aspects and tendencies toward a holistic end-to-end communication infrastructure for Flight 4.0 systems. In this context, and serving as a roadmap, the respective architectures should offer a homogeneous support to a wide range of WSN communication technologies and protocols, while being able to support time-constrained monitor, control, and configuration of critical Flight 4.0 infrastructure. In addition, such architectures must emphasize on the use of distributed components that are able to offer enhanced fault tolerance performance, a critical aspect for most modern aviation systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
F. Hu, Cyber-Physical Systems: Integrated Computing and Engineering Design (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013)
S.K. Khaitan, J.D. McCalley, Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: a survey. IEEE Syst. J. 9(2), 350–365 (2015)
G. Hohpe, B. Woolf, Enterprise Integration Patterns: Designing, Building, and Deploying Messaging Solutions (Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, 2004)
J. Blanckenstein, J. Klaue, H. Karl, A survey of low-power transceivers and their applications. IEEE Circuits Syst. Mag. 15(3), 6–17 (2015)
C.P. Antonopoulos, N.S. Voros, A data compression hardware accelerator enabling long-term biosignal monitoring based on ultra-low power IoT platforms. Electronics 6(3), 54 (2017)
I. 8. L. S. Committee et al., IEEE Standard for Information technology- Telecommunication and information exchange between systems-Local and metropolitan area networks-Specific requirements Part11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendmentl: Radio Resource Measurement of Wireless LANs (2009), http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11.n-2009
D. Malan, T. Fulford-Jones, M. Welsh, S. Moulton, Codeblue: an ad hoc sensor network infrastructure for emergency medical care, in International workshop on wearable and implantable body sensor networks, Vol. 5 (Boston, MA, 2004)
Wireless Sensor Technology, Wireless IMU, ECG, EMG, GSR (2017), www.shimmersensing.com/
Memsic Leader in MEMS Sensor Technology (2017), www.memsic.com/
MTM-CM5000-MSP (2017) www.advanticsys.com/shop/mtmcm5000msp-p-14.html
movisens GmbH, (2017), www.movisens.com/en
Revoking Networks, Advanced User Manual Version 4.77. (2011)
Bluetooth Special Interest Group, Bluetooth Core Specification v4.0. (2010), www.bluetooth.org/en-us/specification/adopted-specifications
IEEE, IEEE 802.15.4-2015 IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks. Technical Report (IEEE, 2015)
Z. Alliance, ZigBee specification, 2008, in ZigBee Document 053474r17 (2008)
S. Bluetooth, Specification of the bluetooth system-covered core package version: 4.0. (2010)
The open-zwave Open Source Project on Git Hub (2017), www.openhub.net/p/open-zwave
I. Mapanga, P. Kadebu, Database management systems: a nosql analysis. Int. J. Mod. Commun. Technol. Res. (IJMCTR) 1, 12–18 (2013)
D.D. Hoang, H.-Y. Paik, C.-K. Kim, Service-oriented middleware architectures for cyber-physical systems (2011)
L. Hu, N. Xie, Z. Kuang, K. Zhao, Review of cyber-physical system architecture, in 15th IEEE International Symposium on.Object/Component/Service-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing Workshops (ISORCW), 2012 (IEEE, 2012), pp. 25–30
Sensing and Control Systems (2017), www.sensingcontrol.com/
Data aware platforms deliver a differentiated service in M2M, IoT and Big Data (2017), www.openhub.net/p/openzwave
Vehicle Connectivity Solutions (2017), www.lairdtech.com/product-categories/vehicle-connectivitysolutions
U. Hunkeler, H. L. Truong, A. Stanford-Clark, MQTT-S-A publish/subscribe protocol for wireless sensor networks, in 3rd International conference on communication systems software and middleware and workshops, 2008 comsware (IEEE, 2008), pp. 791–798
A. Stanford-Clark, H. L. Truong, MQTT for sensor networks (MQTTSN) protocol specification version 1.2 (2008), http://mqtt.org/new/wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/MQTT-SN_spec_v1.2
M. Villamizar, O. Garcés, H. Castro, M. Verano, L. Salamanca, R. Casallas, S. Gil, Evaluating the monolithic and the microservice architecture pattern to deploy web applications in the cloud, in 10th Computing Colombian Conference (10CCC), 2015 (IEEE, 2015), pp. 583–590
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Antonopoulos, C.P., Antonopoulos, K., Voros, N.S. (2018). IoT and Service Oriented Infrastructures for Flight 4.0. In: Durak, U., Becker, J., Hartmann, S., Voros, N. (eds) Advances in Aeronautical Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75058-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75058-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75057-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75058-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)