Skip to main content

The Role of Agricultural Commodity Prices in a Portfolio

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making (IUKM 2018)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate whether including agricultural commodities can improve the portfolio performance by comparing the risk and return of multi-asset portfolio with and without an agricultural commodity price. To achieve our goal, we propose fitting a C-Vine copula based AR-GARCH model to interval data which allows us to capture uncertain characteristics that cannot be sometimes fully described with single data series. By using a convex combination method, we can obtain expected marginal distribution and joint density function, respectively. We then evaluate the portfolios’ risk and return using the expected shortfall concept. The results present that the average risk and return of non-agricultural portfolio outperforms agricultural portfolios. However, considering the one step ahead forecasting efficient frontier, the portfolio with soybean futures becomes superior to other portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Paraschiv, F., Mudry, P.A., Andries, A.M.: Stress-testing for portfolios of commodity futures. Econ. Model. 50, 9–18 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geman, H.: Commodities and Commodity Derivatives: Modeling and Pricing for Agriculturals Metals and Energy. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daskalaki, C., Kostakis, A., Skiadopoulos, G.: Are there common factors in individual commodity futures returns? J. Bank. Financ. 40, 346–363 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodie, Z., Rosansky, V.I.: Risk and return in commodity futures. Financ. Anal. J. 36(3), 27–39 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erb, C.B., Harvey, C.R.: The strategic and tactical value of commodity futures. Financ. Anal. J. 62(2), 69–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorton, G., Rouwenhorst, K.G.: Facts and fantasies about commodity futures. Financ. Anal. J. 62(2), 47–68 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conover, C.M., Jensen, G.R., Johnson, R.R., Mercer, J.M.: Is now the time to add commodities to your portfolio? J. Invest. 19(3), 10–19 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, G.R., Johnson, R.R., Mercer, J.M.: Efficient use of commodity futures in diversified portfolios. J. Futur. Mark. 20(5), 489–506 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Idzorek, T. M.: Commodities and strategic asset allocation. In: Intelligent Commodity Investing, pp. 113–177 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fortenbery, T.R., Hauser, R.J.: Investment potential of agricultural futures contracts. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 72(3), 721–726 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anson, M.J.: Maximizing utility with commodity futures diversification. J. Portf. Manag. 25(4), 86–94 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Georgiev, G.: Benefits of commodity investment. J. Altern. Invest. 4(1), 40–48 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung, C.S., Miu, P.: Diversification benefits of commodity futures. J. Int. Financ. Mark., Inst. Money 20(5), 451–474 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daskalaki, C., Skiadopoulos, G.: Should investors include commodities in their portfolios after all? New evidence. J. Bank. Financ. 35(10), 2606–2626 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silvennoinen, A., Thorp, S.: Financialization, crisis and commodity correlation dynamics. J. Int. Financ. Mark., Inst. Money 24, 42–65 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hürlimann, W.: Multivariate Frchet copulas and conditional value-at-risk. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2004(7), 345–364 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei, Y.H., Zhang, S.Y.: Multivariate Copula-GARCH Model and its applications in financial risk analysis. App. Stat. Manag. 3(008) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. He, X., Gong, P.: Measuring the coupled risks: a copula-based CVaR model. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 223(2), 1066–1080 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Z.R., Chen, X.H., Jin, Y.B., Zhou, Y.J.: Estimating risk of foreign exchange portfolio: using VaR and CVaR based on GARCHEVT-Copula model. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 389(21), 4918–4928 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chanaim, S., Sriboonchitta, S., Rungruang, C.: A convex combination method for linear regression with interval data. In: Huynh, V.-N., Inuiguchi, M., Le, B., Le, B.N., Denoeux, T. (eds.) IUKM 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9978, pp. 469–480. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49046-5_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore, R.E., Kearfott, R.B., Cloud, M.J.: Introduction to Interval Analysis, pp. 7–18. SIAM, Philadelphia (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen, H.T., Kreinovich, V., Wu, B., Xiang, G.: Computing statistics under interval and fuzzy uncertainty. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 393. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24905-1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bollerslev, T.: Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econom. 31(3), 307–327 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelsen, R.B.: Introduction. An Introduction to Copulas. Springer, New York (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Aas, K., Czado, C., Frigessi, A., Bakken, H.: Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insur.: Math. Econ. 44(2), 182–198 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Autchariyapanitkul, K., Chanaim, S., Sriboonchitta, S.: Portfolio optimization of stock returns in high-dimensions: a copula-based approach. Thai J. Math. 11–23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brechmann, E.C., Schepsmeier, U.: Modeling dependence with C-and D-vine copulas: the R-package CDVine. J. Stat. Softw. 52(3), 1–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Mr. Woraphon Yamaka for a rolling window suggestions. Last but not least, we would like to thank all the referees for giving comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chatchai Khiewngamdee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khiewngamdee, C., Song, Q., Chanaim, S. (2018). The Role of Agricultural Commodity Prices in a Portfolio. In: Huynh, VN., Inuiguchi, M., Tran, D., Denoeux, T. (eds) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making. IUKM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75429-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75429-1_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75428-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75429-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics