Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a web-based game designed to investigate how different conditions affect people’s trust in devices. The game is set in a retirement village, where residents live in smart homes equipped with monitoring systems. Players, who “work” in the village, need to trade-off the time spent on administrative tasks (which enable them to earn extra income) against the time spent ensuring the welfare of the residents. The scenario of the game is complex enough to support the investigation of the influence of various factors, such as system accuracy, type of error made by the system, and risk associated with events, on players’ trust in the monitoring system. In this paper, we describe the game and its theoretical underpinnings, and present preliminary results from a trial where players interacted with two systems that have different levels of accuracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The game can be accessed at: http://bit.ly/MonashExp.
- 2.
References
Bagheri, N., Jamieson, G.A.: The impact of context-related reliability on automation failure detection and scanning behaviour. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 212–217. IEEE (2004)
Bean, N.H., Rice, S.C., Keller, M.D.: The effect of Gestalt psychology on the system-wide trust strategy in automation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, pp. 1417–1421 (2011)
Beck, H.P., Dzindolet, M.T., Pierce, L.G.: Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 49(3), 429–437 (2007)
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10(1), 122–142 (1995)
Cook, D., Krishnan, N.: Mining the home environment. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 43(3), 503–519 (2014)
Dadashi, N., Stedmon, A., Pridmore, T.: Semi-automated CCTV surveillance: the effects of system confidence, system accuracy and task complexity on operator vigilance, reliance and workload. Appl. Ergon. 44(5), 730–738 (2013)
de Melo, C., Gratch, J.: People show envy, not guilt, when making decisions with machines. In: International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 315–321 (2015)
Dzindolet, M., Pierce, L., Peterson, S., Purcell, L., Beck, H.: The influence of feedback on automation use, misuse, and disuse. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, pp. 551–555 (2002)
Dzindolet, M.T., Peterson, S.A., Pomranky, R.A., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P.: The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58(6), 697–718 (2003)
Gao, J., Lee, J.D.: Effect of shared information on trust and reliance in a demand forecasting task. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, pp. 215–219 (2006)
Gong, L.: How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(4), 1494–1509 (2008)
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3(4), 367–388 (1982)
Hoff, K., Bashir, M.: Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum. Factors 57(3), 407–434 (2015)
Jamieson, G.A., Wang, L., Neyedli, H.F.: Developing human-machine interfaces to support appropriate trust and reliance on automated combat identification systems. Technical report, DTIC Document (2008)
Kirchner, W.: Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J. Exp. Psychol. 55(4), 352–358 (1958)
Lacson, F.C., Wiegmann, D.A., Madhavan, P.: Effects of attribute and goal framing on automation reliance and compliance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, pp. 482–486 (2005)
Lee, E.J.: Flattery may get computers somewhere, sometimes: the moderating role of output modality, computer gender, and user gender. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(11), 789–800 (2008)
Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D.A., Lacson, F.C.: Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 48(2), 241–256 (2006)
Moray, N., Inagaki, T., Itoh, M.: Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 6(1), 44–58 (2000)
Moshtaghi, M., Zukerman, I., Russell, R.: Statistical models for unobtrusively detecting abnormal periods of inactivity in older adults. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 25(3), 231–265 (2015)
Oduor, K.F., Wiebe, E.N.: The effects of automated decision algorithm modality and transparency on reported trust and task performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting, pp. 302–306 (2008)
Parasuraman, R., Miller, C.A.: Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Commun. ACM 47(4), 51–55 (2004)
Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors 39(2), 230–253 (1997)
Sanchez, J.: Factors that affect trust and reliance on an automated aid. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2006)
Seong, Y., Bisantz, A.M.: The impact of cognitive feedback on judgment performance and trust with decision aids. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38(7), 608–625 (2008)
Spain, R.D., Madhavan, P.: The role of automation etiquette and pedigree in trust and dependence. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting, pp. 339–343 (2009)
de Visser, E.J., Krueger, F., McKnight, P., Scheid, S., Smith, M., Chalk, S., Parasuraman, R.: The world is not enough: trust in cognitive agents. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, pp. 263–267 (2012)
Walliser, J.C., de Visser, E.J., Shaw, T.H.: Application of a system-wide trust strategy when supervising multiple autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting, pp. 133–137 (2016)
Wang, L., Jamieson, G., Hollands, J.G.: The effects of design features on users’ trust in and reliance on a combat identification system. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, pp. 375–379 (2011)
Wang, L., Jamieson, G.A., Hollands, J.G.: Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 51(3), 281–291 (2009)
Yu, K., Berkovsky, S., Taib, R., Conway, D., Zhou, J., Chen, F.: User trust dynamics: an investigation driven by differences in system performance. In: IUI 2017 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 307–317 (2017)
Zanatto, D., Patacchiola, M., Goslin, J., Cangelosi, A.: Priming anthropomorphism: can our trust in humanlike robots be transferred to non-humanlike robots? In: Proceeding of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 543–544 (2016)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Matt Chen for his help in recording the training video, and Stephen Meagher for his assistance with the penalty estimations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zukerman, I., Partovi, A., Zhan, K., Hamacher, N., Stout, J., Moshtaghi, M. (2018). A Game for Eliciting Trust Between People and Devices Under Diverse Performance Conditions. In: Cazenave, T., Winands, M., Saffidine, A. (eds) Computer Games. CGW 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75931-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75931-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75930-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75931-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)