Skip to main content

The Influence of Body Proportions on Perceived Gender of Robots in Latin America

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Love and Sex with Robots (LSR 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10715))

Included in the following conference series:

  • The original version of this chapter was revised: The results section of the chapter is not correct. This has been now corrected. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76369-9_13

Abstract

Subtle aspects of a robot’s appearance may create biased expectations of the robot’s abilities, which may influence user acceptance. The present research investigated the perception of gender in robot design, focusing specifically on the proportion between chest, waist, and hips to indicate robot gender. We did so by conducting an online survey in Latin American context. The results highlight the importance of chest-to-hip ratio and waist-to-hip ratio in gender attribution and mind attribution to robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 60.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 07 April 2019

    The results section of the chapter was not correct. This has been now corrected.

References

  1. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann, K., Eyssel, F., Kopp, S.: A second chance to make a first impression? How appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7502, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Eyssel, F., Loughnan, S.: “It don’t matter if you’re black or white”? Effects of robot appearance and user prejudice on evaluations of a newly developed robot companion. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds.) ICSR 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8239, pp. 422–431. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Hegel, F., de Ruiter, L.: Activating elicited agent knowledge: how robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2012), pp. 851–857 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2012.6343858

  5. Kuchenbrandt, D., Häring, M., Eichberg, J., Eyssel, F., André, E.: Keep an eye on the task! Effects of task characteristics on human-robot interactions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 417–427 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reich-Stiebert, N., Eyssel, F.: Robots in the classroom: what teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, J.-J., Howard, A.M., Salichs, M.A., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9979, pp. 671–680. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F.: (S)he’s got the look: gender-stereotyping of social robots. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 2213–2230 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, S., Kiesler, S., Lau, I.Y., Chiu, C.: Human mental models of humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2005), Barcelona, 18–22 April, pp. 2767–2772 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Powers, A., Kramer, A.D.I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S.-L., Kiesler, S.: Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 158–163 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Y., Young, J.E.: Beyond “Pink” and “Blue”: gendered attitudes towards robots in society. In: Proceedings of Gender and IT Appropriation. Science and Practice on Dialogue - Forum for Interdisciplinary Exchange (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trovato, G., Lopez, A., Paredes, R., Cuellar, F.: Security and guidance: two roles for a humanoid robot in an interaction experiment. Presented at the 2016 IEEE RO-MAN, Lisbon, Portugal (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernotat, J., Eyssel, F., Sachse, J.: Shape it – the influence of robot body shape on gender perception in robots. In: Kheddar, A., Yoshida, E., Ge, S.S., Suzuki, K., Cabibihan, J.-J., Eyssel, F., He, H. (eds.) Social Robotics, ICSR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10652, pp. 75–84. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dijkstra, P., Buunk, B.P.: Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival’s body build. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22(5), 335–341 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00070-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lidwell, W., Manacsa, G.: Deconstructing Product Design: Exploring the Form, Function, Usability, Sustainability, and Commercial Success of 100 Amazing Products. Rockport Publishers, Beverly (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goddard, A., Patterson, L.M.: Language and Gender. Psychology Press, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schott, G.D.: Sex symbols ancient and modern: their origins and iconography on the pedigree. BMJ 331(7531), 1509–1510 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh, D.: Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69(6), 1089–1101 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des. Stud. 25(6), 547–577 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Onchi, E., Lucho, C., Sigüenza, M., Trovato, G., Cuellar, F.: Erratum to: introducing IOmi - a female robot hostess for guidance in a university environment. In: Agah, A., Cabibihan, J.-J., Howard, A.M., Salichs, M.A., He, H. (eds.) ICSR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9979, p. E1. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Guizzo, E.: Meet Pepper, Aldebaran’s new personal robot with an “Emotion Engine”. IEEE Spectr. (2014). Last accessed 14 Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blondet, C.: Out of the kitchens and onto the streets: women’s activism in Peru. In: Basu, A. (ed.) The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women’s Movements in Global Perspective, pp. 251–75. Westview Press, Boulder (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mensa, M.: Creative women in Peru: outliers in a machismo world. Commun. Soc. 28(2), 1–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.2.1-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glick, P., Fiske, S.T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J.L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., López López, W.: Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 79(5), 763–775 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dixson, B.J., Dixson, A.F., Li, B., Anderson, M.J.: Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19(1), 88–95 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Kooy, K., Leenen, R., Seidell, J.C., Deurenberg, P., Droop, A., Bakker, C.J.: Waist-hip ratio is a poor predictor of changes in visceral fat. Am. J. Clin. Nutrit. 57(3), 327–333 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin, Y.-C., Wang, M.-J.J., Wang, E.M.: The comparisons of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in East Asia. Appl. Ergon. 35, 173–178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bem, S.L.: The measurement of psychological Androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42(2), 155–162 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernandez Sedano, I.: Actitudes, auto-conceptos, cultura y emoción: una investigación transcultural (Ph.D. thesis). UPV/EHU (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rollero, C., Glick, P., Tartaglia, S.: Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. TPM: Test. Psychometrics Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 21(2), 149–159 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Glick, P., Fiske, S.T.: The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70(3), 491 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Expósito, F., Glick, P., Morales, M.C.M.: Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos. Rev. Psicología Soc. 13(2), 159–169 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Trovato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trovato, G., Lucho, C., Eyssel, F., Bernotat, J. (2018). The Influence of Body Proportions on Perceived Gender of Robots in Latin America. In: Cheok, A., Levy, D. (eds) Love and Sex with Robots. LSR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10715. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76369-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76369-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76368-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76369-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics