Skip to main content

Optimization in Extractive Summarization Processes Through Automatic Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10762))

Abstract

The results of an extractive automatic summarization task depends to a great extend on the nature of the processed texts (e.g., news, medicine, or literature). In fact, general-purpose methods usually need to be adhoc modified to improve their performance when dealing with a particular application context. However, this customization requires a lot of effort from domain experts and application developers, which makes it not always possible nor appropriate. In this paper, we propose a multi-language approach to extractive summarization which adapts itself to different text domains in order to improve its performance. In a training step, our approach leverages the features of the text documents in order to classify them by using machine learning techniques. Then, once the text typology of each text is identified, it tunes the different parameters of the extraction mechanism solving an optimization problem for each of the text document classes. This classifier along with the learned optimizations associated with each document class allows our system to adapt to each of the input texts automatically. The proposed method has been applied in a real environment of a media company with promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, they belong to ValF family of functions as well, but for the sake’s of readability we have decided to change their name.

  2. 2.

    We are aware we could get rid of the baseline term, but it is useful for the sake of comparing our approach with generic approaches.

  3. 3.

    http://www.heraldo.es.

  4. 4.

    Stop words are common words without relevant information (e.g. articles or conjunctions).

  5. 5.

    A lemma is the canonical form of a word. For example, in English, sing, sings, sang, sung, and singing are different forms of the same verb, with “sing” as their common lemma.

  6. 6.

    http://swesum.nada.kth.se/index-eng.html.

  7. 7.

    https://www.tools4noobs.com/summarize/.

  8. 8.

    http://autosummarizer.com/.

  9. 9.

    http://textsummarization.net/.

References

  1. Brandow, R., Mitze, K., Rau, L.F.: Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection. Inf. Process. Manag. 31(5), 675–685 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, Y., Li, S., Cao, Y., Lin, C.-Y., Han, D., Yu, Y.: Understanding and summarizing answers in community-based question answering services. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2008), pp. 497–504. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Padhy, N., Mishra, P., Panigrahi, R.: The survey of data mining applications and feature scope. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2(3), 43–58 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta, V., Lehal, G.S.: A survey of text summarization extractive techniques. J. Emerg. Technol. Web Intell. 2(3), 258–268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, C.-Y., Hovy, E.: Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (NAACL 2003), pp. 71–78. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lal, P., Ruger, S.: Extract-based summarization with simplification. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Workshop on Text Summarization (DUC 2002), pp. 1–8, NIST (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, W., Wu, M., Lu, Q., Xu, W., Yuan, C.: Extractive summarization using inter-and intra-event relevance. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING ACL 2006), pp. 369–376. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nenkova, A., McKeown, K.: A survey of text summarization techniques. In: Mining Text Data, pp. 43–76. Springer, Boston (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Luhn, H.P.: The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2(2), 159–165 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Edmundson, H.P.: New methods in automatic extracting. J. ACM (JACM) 16(2), 264–285 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J., Chen, F.: A trainable document summarizer. In: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 1995), pp. 68–73. ACM (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, C.-Y.: Training a selection function for extraction. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 1999), pp. 55–62. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conroy, J.M., O’leary, D.P.: Text summarization via hidden Markov models. In: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2001), pp. 406–407. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osborne, M.: Using maximum entropy for sentence extraction. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Automatic Summarization (AS 2002), pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Svore, K.M., Vanderwende, L., Burges, C.J.: Enhancing single-document summarization by combining ranknet and third-party sources. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joing Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pp. 448–457. Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferreira, R., Freitas, F., de Souza Cabral, L., Lins, R.D., Lima, R., Franca, G., Simske, S.J., Favaro, L.: A context based text summarization system. In: Proceedings of the 11th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS 2014), pp. 66–70. IEEE Xplore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, Y., Wang, X., Mei, Q., Liu, Y.: Towards Twitter context summarization with user influence models. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM 2013), pp. 527–536. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, vol. 186. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bond, F.F.: An Introduction to Journalism: A Survey of the Fourth Estate in all its Forms. Macmillan, New York (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacQuail, D.: Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. Sage Publications, London (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wolny-Zmorzyński, K., Kozieł, A.: Journalistic genology. Media Stud. 54, 1–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bell, A.: The discourse structure of news stories. In: Approaches to Media Discourse, pp. 64–104 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0026683

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Shin, K.-S., Lee, T.S., Jung Kim, H.: An application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction model. Expert. Syst. Appl. 28(1), 127–135 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garrido, A.L., Gomez, O., Ilarri, S., Mena, E.: NASS: news annotation semantic system. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2011), pp. 904–905. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Garrido, A.L., Gómez, O., Ilarri, S., Mena, E.: An experience developing a semantic annotation system in a media group. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds.) NLDB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7337, pp. 333–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31178-9_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Garrido, A.L., Buey, M.G., Ilarri, S., Mena, E.: GEO-NASS: a semantic tagging experience from geographical data on the media. In: Catania, B., Guerrini, G., Pokorný, J. (eds.) ADBIS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8133, pp. 56–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40683-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Garrido, A.L., Buey, M.G., Escudero, S., Peiro, A., Ilarri, S., Mena, E.: The GENIE project-a semantic pipeline for automatic document categorisation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2014), pp. 161–171, SCITEPRESS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5), 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garrido, A.L., Peiro, A., Ilarri, S.: Hypatia: An expert system proposal for documentation departments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY 2014), pp. 315–320. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garrido, A.L., Ilarri, S., Sangiao, S., Gañan, A., Bean, A., Cardiel, O.: NEREA: named entity recognition and disambiguation exploiting local document repositories. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2016), pp. 1035–1042. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work has been supported by the CICYT project TIN2013-46238-C4-4-R, TIN2016-78011-C4-3-R (AEI/FEDER, UE), and DGA/FEDER. We want to thank Grupo Heraldo for their collaboration, and specially to Domingo Tardos and Susana Sangiao.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Luis Garrido .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garrido, A.L., Bobed, C., Cardiel, O., Aleyxendri, A., Quilez, R. (2018). Optimization in Extractive Summarization Processes Through Automatic Classification. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77115-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77116-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics