Abstract
In the Red-Blue Nonblocker problem, the input is a bipartite graph \(G=(R \uplus B, E)\) and an integer k, and the question is whether one can select at least k vertices from R so that every vertex in B has a neighbor in R that was not selected. While the problem is W[1]-complete for parameter k, a related problem, Nonblocker, is FPT for parameter k. In the Nonblocker problem, we are given a graph H and an integer k, and the question is whether one can select at least k vertices so that every selected vertex has a neighbor that was not selected. There is also a simple reduction from Nonblocker to Red-Blue Nonblocker, creating two copies of the vertex set and adding an edge between two vertices in different copies if they correspond to the same vertex or to adjacent vertices. We give FPT algorithms for Red-Blue Nonblocker instances that are the result of this transformation – we call these instances symmetric. This is not achieved by playing back the entire transformation, since this problem is NP-complete, but by a kernelization argument that is inspired by playing back the transformation only for certain well-structured parts of the instance. We also give an FPT algorithm for almost symmetric instances, where we assume the symmetry relation is part of the input.
Next, we augment the parameter by \(\ell = \left| B \right| /\left| R \right| \). Somewhat surprisingly, Red-Blue Nonblocker is W[1]-hard for the parameter \(k+\ell \), but becomes FPT if no vertex in B has degree 1. The FPT algorithm relies on a structural argument where we show that when |R| is large with respect to k and \(\ell \), we can greedily compute a red-blue nonblocker of size at least k. The same results also hold if we augment the parameter by \(d_R\) instead of \(\ell \), where \(d_R\) is the average degree of the vertices in R.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alber, J., Bodlaender, H.L., Fernau, H., Kloks, T., Niedermeier, R.: Fixed parameter algorithms for DOMINATING SET and related problems on planar graphs. Algorithmica 33(4), 461–493 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-001-0116-5
Cairns, G., Mendan, S.: Symmetric bipartite graphs and graphs with loops. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 17(1), 97–102 (2015). http://dmtcs.episciences.org/2119
Dehne, F., Fellows, M., Fernau, H., Prieto, E., Rosamond, F.: nonblocker: parameterized algorithmics for minimum dominating set. In: Wiedermann, J., Tel, G., Pokorný, J., Bieliková, M., Štuller, J. (eds.) SOFSEM 2006. LNCS, vol. 3831, pp. 237–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11611257_21
Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Fixed-parameter tractability and completeness II: on completeness for W[1]. Theor. Comput. Sci. 141(1&2), 109–131 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(94)00097-3
Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Parameterized Complexity. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0515-9
Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Fundamentals of Parameterized Complexity. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5559-1
Fomin, F.V., Grandoni, F., Kratsch, D.: A measure & conquer approach for the analysis of exact algorithms. J. ACM 56(5), 25:1–25:32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1552285.1552286
Fomin, F.V., Kratsch, D., Woeginger, G.J.: Exact (exponential) algorithms for the dominating set problem. In: Hromkovič, J., Nagl, M., Westfechtel, B. (eds.) WG 2004. LNCS, vol. 3353, pp. 245–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30559-0_21
Grandoni, F.: A note on the complexity of minimum dominating set. J. Discrete Algorithms 4(2), 209–214 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jda.2005.03.002
Halldórsson, M.M., Radhakrishnan, J.: Greed is good: approximating independent sets in sparse and bounded-degree graphs. Algorithmica 18(1), 145–163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523693
Iwata, Y.: A faster algorithm for dominating set analyzed by the potential method. In: Marx, D., Rossmanith, P. (eds.) IPEC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7112, pp. 41–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28050-4_4
Kanj, I.A., Xia, G.: When is weighted satisfiability FPT? In: Dehne, F., Solis-Oba, R., Sack, J.-R. (eds.) WADS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8037, pp. 451–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40104-6_39
Lubiw, A.: Some NP-complete problems similar to graph isomorphism. SIAM J. Comput. 10(1), 11–21 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1137/0210002
McCuaig, W., Shepherd, F.B.: Domination in graphs with minimum degree two. J. Graph Theory 13(6), 749–762 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.3190130610
Ore, O.: Theory of Graphs. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1962)
Turán, P.: On an extremal problem in graph theory. Matematikai és Fizikai Lapok 48, 436–452 (1941). In Hungarian
Acknowledgments
Serge Gaspers is the recipient of an Australian Research Council (ARC) Future Fellowship (FT140100048). This work received support under the ARC’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (DP150101134).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gaspers, S., Gudmundsson, J., Horton, M., Rümmele, S. (2018). When is Red-Blue Nonblocker Fixed-Parameter Tractable?. In: Bender, M., Farach-Colton, M., Mosteiro, M. (eds) LATIN 2018: Theoretical Informatics. LATIN 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77404-6_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77404-6_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77403-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77404-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)