Skip to main content

The Application of Change Indicators in Mining Software Repositories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'18 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 746))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4126 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a framework to identify a problematic or uncontrollable rise in the number of software change requests and to take right actions to fix it. With this work, we propose the use of an acceptable limit number of change requests as indicators to track the evolution of software change requests. The change indicators are used to identify a periodical sharp rise in demands of change requests fast enough and provide the right fix on time. Not only these indicators track the evolution of change request, but they also help to identify the right solution to address the triggers of these change requests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IEEE Std 1219-1998: IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance. IEEE (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brand, S.: How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. Rev. pbk. ed. Phoenix, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniol, G., Ayari, K., Di Penta, M., Khomh, F., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G.: Is it a bug or an enhancement? A text-based approach to classify change requests. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research: Meeting of Minds, p. 23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Métrailler, A., Estier, T.: EVOLIS framework: a method to study information systems evolution records. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3798–3807 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Lucca, G.A., Di Penta, M., Gradara, S.: An approach to classify software maintenance requests. In: 2002 Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 93–102 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anvik, J., Hiew, L., Murphy, G.C.: Who should fix this bug? In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 361–370 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anvik, J., Hiew, L., Murphy, G.C.: Coping with an open bug repository, pp. 35–39 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chapin, N., Hale, J.E., Khan, K.M., Ramil, J.F., Tan, W.-G.: Types of software evolution and software maintenance. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. Res. Pract. 13(1), 3–30 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Swanson, E.B.: The dimensions of maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 492–497 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xia, X., Lo, D., Wang, X., Zhou, B.: Dual analysis for recommending developers to resolve bugs. J. Softw. Evol. Process 27(3), 195–220 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. da Mota Silveira Neto, P.A., Lucrédio, D., Vale, T., de Almeida, E.S., de Lemos Meira, S.R.: The bug report duplication problem: an exploratory study. Softw. Qual. J. 21(1), 39–66 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Butler, R.W., Finelli, G.B.: The infeasibility of quantifying the reliability of life-critical real-time software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 19(1), 3–12 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan, K.T.: Software processes for a changing world: Software processes for a changing world. J. Softw. Evol. Process 28(4), 236–240 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ulziit, B., Warraich, Z.A., Gencel, C., Petersen, K.: A conceptual framework of challenges and solutions for managing global software maintenance. J. Softw. Evol. Process 27(10), 763–792 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lehman, M.M.: Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proc. IEEE 68(9), 1060–1076 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaafar, F., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G., Hamel, S., Antoniol, G.: Detecting asynchrony and dephase change patterns by mining software repositories. J. Softw. Evol. Process 26(1), 77–106 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hochstein, A., Rüdiger, Z., Walter, B.: ITIL as common practice reference model for IT service management: formal assessment and implications for practice. In: EEE 2005 Proceedings of e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kagdi, H., Gethers, M., Poshyvanyk, D., Hammad, M.: Assigning change requests to software developers. J. Softw. Evol. Process 24(1), 3–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cavalcanti, Y.C., da Mota Silveira Neto, P.A., Machado, I.D.C., Vale, T.F., de Almeida, E.S., Meira, S.R.D.L.: Challenges and opportunities for software change request repositories: a systematic mapping study. J. Softw. Evol. Process 26(7), 620–653 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Canfora, G., Cerulo, L.: Impact analysis by mining software and change request repositories, pp. 29–29 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aljarah, I., Banitaan, S., Abufardeh, S., Jin, W., Salem, S.: Selecting discriminating terms for bug assignment: a formal analysis, pp. 1–7 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11(3), 369 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A definition of indicator. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/indicator

  25. Change management: best practices – Cisco. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/services/high-availability/white_paper_c11-458050.html. Accessed 26 Nov 2017

  26. Kanwal, J., Maqbool, O.: Bug prioritization to facilitate bug report triage. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 27(2), 397–412 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tian, Y., Lo, D., Sun, C.: DRONE: predicting priority of reported bugs by multi-factor analysis, pp. 200–209 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nico Hillah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hillah, N., Estier, T. (2018). The Application of Change Indicators in Mining Software Repositories. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 746. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77711-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77712-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics