Skip to main content

Measuring Quality of Experience of Novel 360-Degree Streaming Video During Stalling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Communications and Networking (ChinaCom 2017)

Abstract

With the rapid growth of novel 360-degree video streaming applications, there has been a strong demand of quality-of-experience (QoE) measurement. For the novel experience provided by the 360-degree video, there still lack of corresponding research and usable evaluation model. In this paper, the user’s QoE during the stalling event for the 360-degree streaming video viewed on the Virtual Reality (VR) Head-Mounted Display (HMD) is obtained for the first time by an elaborately designed subjective experiment. The impact of stalling event on the QoE of 360-degree video streaming is then investigated. We find that there is a significant difference between the QoE during the stalling for the 360-degree video streaming and the traditional video streaming, which indicates that the existing QoE evaluation models are no longer suitable for evaluating the QoE of 360-degree video streaming. This preliminary finding appeals for more researches on modeling the specific QoE of 360-degree video streaming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Digital Democracy Survey: A multi-generational view of consumer technology, media and telecom trends, Deloite’s Technology, Media and Tele-communications (TMT) practice, March 23, 2016. https://www2.deloite.com/content/dam/Deloite/glob-al/Documents/Tech-nology-Media-Telecommunications/gx-tmt-deloite-democracy-survey.pdf

  2. The Future of Consumer VR and Its Impact on Video Viewing, 2016–2025: The Diffusion Group, January 6, 2016. http://tdgresearch.com/report/the-future-of-consumer-vr-and-its-impact-on-video-viewing-2016-2025/

  3. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com

  4. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com

  5. Adobe. Delivery: Progressive download. Video Technology Center, http://www.adobe.com/devnet/video/progressive.html

  6. Krishnan, S.S., Sitaraman, R.K.: Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 21(6), 2001–2014 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Definition of Quality of Experience (QoE). Rec. TD 109rev2 (PLEN/12) ITU-T, Geneva, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Song, J., Yang, F., Zhou, Y., et al.: QoE Evaluation of Multimedia Services Based on Audiovisual Quality and User Interest. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 18(3), 444–457 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao, J., Kanhere, Salil S., Hossain, I., Hassan, M.: Empirical Evaluation of HTTP Adaptive Streaming under Vehicular Mobility. In: Domingo-Pascual, J., Manzoni, P., Palazzo, S., Pont, A., Scoglio, C. (eds.) Networking 2011. LNCS, vol. 6640, pp. 92–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20757-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Seufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., Zinner, T., Hobfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P.: A survey on quality of experience of HTTP adaptive streaming. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(1), 469–492 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Howard, I.P., Rogers, B.J.: Binocular Vision and Stereopsis, pp. 31–33. Oxford University Press, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ITU-T P. 913: Methods for the Subjective Assessment of Video Quality, Audio Quality and Audiovisual Quality of Internet Video and Distribution Quality Television in Any Environment (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P.: A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Netw. 24(2), 36–41 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoßfeld, T., Seufert, M., Hirth, M., Zinner, T., Tran-Gia, P., Schatz, R.: Quantification of YouTube QoE via crowdsourcing. In: IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM). IEEE, pp. 494–499 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoßfeld, T., Schatz, R., Biersack, E., Plissonneau, L.: Internet video delivery in YouTube: from traffic measurements to quality of experience. In: Biersack, E., Callegari, C., Matijasevic, M. (eds.) Data Traffic Monitoring and Analysis. LNCS, vol. 7754, pp. 264–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36784-7_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant 61601349, 61571337, and by the 111 Project B08038.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjie Zou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zou, W., Yang, F. (2018). Measuring Quality of Experience of Novel 360-Degree Streaming Video During Stalling. In: Li, B., Shu, L., Zeng, D. (eds) Communications and Networking. ChinaCom 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 236. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78130-3_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78130-3_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78129-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78130-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics