Abstract
Biomarkers of radiosensitivity are currently a widespread research interest due to a demand for a sufficient method of prediction of cell response to ionizing radiation. Copy Number State (CNS) alterations may significantly influence individual radiosensitivity. However, their possible impact has not been entirely investigated yet. The purpose of this research was to select markers for which CNS change is significantly associated with the surviving fraction after irradiation with 2 Gy dose (SF2), which is a commonly used measure of cellular radiosensitivity. Moreover, a new strategy of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches is proposed as the identification of potential biomarkers is based not only on the overall SF2 and CNS correlation, but also on differences of it between radiosensitive and regular response cell strains. Four patterns of association are considered and functional analysis and Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of obtained sets of genomic positions are performed. Proposed strategy provides a comprehensive insight into the strength and direction of association between CNS and cellular radiosensitivity. Obtained results suggest that commonly used approach of group comparison based on testing two samples against each other is not sufficient in terms of radiosensitivity since this is not a discrete variable and division into sensitive, normal and resistant individuals is always stipulated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ree, A.H., Redalen, K.R.: Personalized radiotherapy: concepts, biomarkers and trial design. Br. J. Radiol. 88(1051), 20150009 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150009
Alymani, N.A., Smith, M.D., Williams, D.J., Petty, R.D.: Predictive biomarkers for personalised anti-cancer drug use: discovery to clinical implementation. Eur. J. Cancer 46, 869–879 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.001
Yard, B.D., et al.: A genetic basis for the variation in the vulnerability of cancer to DNA damage. Nat. Commun. 7, 11428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11428
Story, M., Ding, L.H., Brock, W.A., Ang, K.K., Alsbeih, G., Minna, J., Park, S., Das, A.: Defining molecular and cellular responses after low and high linear energy transfer radiations to develop biomarkers of carcinogenic risk or therapeutic outcome. Health Phys. 103(5), 596–606 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3182692085
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Chromosome Analysis Suite 3.1 (ChAS 3.1) User Guide. http://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/chas3_1_userguide.pdf
Tucker, S.L., Turesson, I., Thames, H.D.: Evidence for individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin. Eur. J. Cancer 11, 1783–1791 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(92)90004-L
Geara, F.B., Peters, L.J., Ang, K.K., Wike, J.L., Brock, W.A.: Prospective comparison of in vitro normal cell radiosensitivity and normal tissue reactions in radiotherapy patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 27, 1173–1179 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(93)90540-C
Johansen, J., Bentzen, S.M., Overgaard, J., Overgaard, M.: Evidence for a positive correlation between in vitro radiosensitivity of normal human skin fibroblasts and the occurrence of subcutaneous fibrosis after radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66, 407–412 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009414551361
Johansen, J., Bentzen, S.M., Overgaard, J., Overgaard, M.: Relationship between the in vitro radiosensitivity of skin fibroblasts and the expression of subcutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, and skin erythema after radiotherapy. Radiother. Oncol. 40, 101–109 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(96)01777-X
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (2013)
Durinck, S., Spellman, P.T., Birney, E., Huber, W.: Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 4(8), 1184–1191 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.97
Durinck, S., Moreau, Y., Kasprzyk, A., Davis, S., De Moor, B., Brazma, A., Huber, W.: BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 21(16), 3439–3440 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti525
Falcon, S., Gentleman, R.: Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 23(2), 257–258 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl567
Ashburner, M., et al.: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene ontology consortium. Nat. Genet. 25(1), 25–29 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/75556
The Gene Ontology Consortium: Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(D1), D331–D338 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1108
Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 57, 289–300 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101
Zakhvataev, V.E.: Possible scenarios of the influence of low-dose ionizing radiation on neural functioning. Med. Hypotheses 85(6), 723–735 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.10.020
Katsura, M., et al.: Effects of chronic low-dose radiation on human neural progenitor cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 20027 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20027
Tanaka, T., Munshi, A., Brooks, C., Liu, J., Hobbs, M.L., Meyn, R.E.: Gefitinib radiosensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells by suppressing cellular DNA repair capacity. Clin. Cancer Res. 14(4), 1266–1273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1606
Lee, H.J., et al.: Tyrosine 370 phosphorylation of ATM positively regulates DNA damage response. Cell Res. 25(2), 225–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.8
Cengel, K.A., McKenna, W.G.: Molecular targets for altering radiosensitivity: lessons from Ras as a pre-clinical and clinical model. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 55(2), 103–116 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.02.001
Pattje, W.J., Schuuring, E., Mastik, M.F., Slagter-Menkema, L., Schrijvers, M.L., Alessi, S., van der Laan, B.F., Roodenburg, J.L., Langendijk, J.A., van der Wal, J.E.: The phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 mediates radiosensitivity in head and neck cancer. Br. J. Cancer 102(12), 1778–1785 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605707
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by SUT Grant Number BKM/508/RAU1/2017/25 (JT), SUT Grant Number BK–204/RAU1/2017/9 (JP) and NSTIP-KACST 11-BIO1429-20 (RAC# 2120 003) (NAL, SBJ, SM, GA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tobiasz, J., Al-Harbi, N., Judia, S.B., Majid, S., Alsbeih, G., Polanska, J. (2018). Are Radiosensitive and Regular Response Cells Homogeneous in Their Correlations Between Copy Number State and Surviving Fraction After Irradiation?. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10813. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78722-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78723-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)