Abstract
The Android operating system provides a rich security model that specifies over 100 distinct permissions. Before performing a sensitive operation, an app must obtain the corresponding permission through a request to the user. Unfortunately, an app is treated as an opaque, monolithic security principal, which is granted or denied permission as a whole. This blunts the effectiveness of the permissions model. Even the recent enhancements in Android do not account for the interactions between multiple permissions or for multiple uses of a single permission for disparate functionality.
We describe app splitting, a technique that partitions a monolithic Android app into a number of collaborating minion apps. This technique exposes information flows inside an application to OS-level mediation mechanisms to allow more expressive security and privacy policies. We implement app splitting in a tool called AppSaw. We describe a method for automatically selecting code partitions that isolate permission uses to distinct minion apps, and use existing security mechanisms to mediate the flow of privileged data. Our partitioning strategy based on vertex multicuts ensures that the minion apps are created efficiently. In our experiments, AppSaw was effective at splitting real-world apps, and incurred a low average performance overhead of 3%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We can specify any permission pair as a policy and AppSaw ensures that any flow between these permissions will cross a minion boundary. It is up to the user to decide if separating these permissions is meaningful.
References
Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Mobility Management Suites. https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-390IMNG&ct=160608&st=sb. Accessed 14 Apr 2015
We can still crack you! https://www.blackhat.com/docs/asia-15/materials/asia-15-Park-We-Can-Still-Crack-You-General-Unpacking-Method-For-Android-Packer-No-Root.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017
Agarwal, A., Alon, N., Charikar, M.: Improved approximation for directed cut problems. In: STOC (2007)
Akhawe, D., Saxena, P., Song, D.: Privilege separation in HTML5 applications. In: Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, p. 23. USENIX Association (2012)
Amalfitano, D., Fasolino, A.R., Tramontana, P., De Carmine, S., Memon, A.M.: Using GUI ripping for automated testing of android applications. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2012, pp. 258–261. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2351676.2351717. ISBN 978-1-4503-1204-2
APKTool. Android apktool: a tool for Reengineering Android APK files. code.google.com/p/android-apktool/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
Arzt, S., Rasthofer, S., Fritz, C., Bodden, E. Bartel, A., Klein, J., Traon, Y.L., Octeau, D., McDaniel, P.: FlowDroid: precise context, flow, field, object-sensitive and lifecycle-aware taint analysis for android apps. In: Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI). ACM, June 2014
Au, K.W.Y., Zhou, Y.F., Huang, Z., Lie, D.: PScout: analyzing the android permission specification. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2012, pp. 217–228. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2382196.2382222. ISBN 978-1-4503-1651-4
Bartel, A., Klein, J., Monperrus, M., Le Traon, Y.: Dexpler: converting android dalvik bytecode to jimple for static analysis with soot. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on the State Of the Art in Java Program Analysis (SOAP 2012) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2259051.2259056. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00697421/PDF/article.pdf
Calzavara, S., Bugliesi, M., Crafa, S., Steffinlongo, E.: Fine-grained detection of privilege escalation attacks on browser extensions. In: Vitek, J. (ed.) ESOP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9032, pp. 510–534. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46669-8_21
Dietz, M., Shekhar, S., Pisetsky, Y., Shu, A., Wallach, D.S.: QUIRE: lightweight provenance for smart phone operating systems. In: 20th USENIX Security Symposium, San Francisco, CA, August 2011
Enck, W., Gilbert, P., Chun, B.-G., Cox, L.P., Jung, J., McDaniel, P., Sheth, A.N.: TaintDroid: an information-flow tracking system for realtime privacy monitoring on smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI 2010, pp. 1–6. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2010). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1924943.1924971
Felt, A.P., Chin, E., Hanna, S., Song, D., Wagner, D.: Android permissions demystified. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2011, pp. 627–638. ACM, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2046707.2046779. ISBN 978-1-4503-0948-6
Fragkaki, E., Bauer, L., Jia, L., Swasey, D.: Modeling and enhancing android’s permission system. In: Foresti, S., Yung, M., Martinelli, F. (eds.) ESORICS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7459, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33167-1_1
Gupta, A.: Improved results for directed multicut. In: SODA (2003)
Lengauer, T., Tarjan, R.: A fast algorithm for finding dominators in a flowgraph. ACM TOPLAS 1(1), 121–141 (1997)
Livshits, B., Chong, S.: Towards fully automatic placement of security sanitizers and declassifiers. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), January 2013
Luo, Z., Rezk, T.: Mashic compiler: mashup sandboxing based on inter-frame communication. In: 2012 IEEE 25th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), pp. 157–170. IEEE (2012)
Muchnick, S.S.: Advanced Compiler Design and Implementation. Academic Press, Cambridge (1997)
Pearce, P., Felt, A.P., Nunez, G., Wagner, D.: AdDroid: privilege separation for applications and advertisers in android. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security, ASIACCS 2012, pp. 71–72. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2414456.2414498. ISBN 978-1-4503-1648-4
Rafi, D.M., Moses, K.R.K., Petersen, K., Mäntylä, M.: Benefits and limitations of automated software testing: systematic literature review and practitioner survey. In: 7th International Workshop on Automation of Software Test, AST 2012, Zurich, Switzerland, 2–3 June 2012, pp. 36–42 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWAST.2012.6228988
Rasthofer, S., Arzt, S., Bodden, E.: A machine-learning approach for classifying and categorizing android sources and sinks. In: NDSS (2014)
Roesner, F., Kohno, T.: Securing embedded user interfaces: android and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 22nd USENIX Conference on Security, SEC 2013, pp. 97–112. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2013). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2534766.2534776. ISBN 978-1-931971-03-4
Sayed, S., Hashim, Y., Komatineni, S., MacLean, D.: Pro Android 2. Apress, New York (2010)
Shekhar, S., Dietz, M., Wallach, D.S.: AdSplit: separating smartphone advertising from applications. In: Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, Security 2012, p. 28. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2012). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2362793.2362821
Toubiana, V., Narayanan, A., Boneh, D., Nissenbaum, H., Barocas, S.: Adnostic: privacy preserving targeted advertising. In: NDSS (2010)
Vallée-Rai, R., Co, P., Gagnon, E., Hendren, L., Lam, P., Sundaresan, V.: Soot-a Java bytecode optimization framework. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, p. 13. IBM Press (1999)
Wasserman, A.I.: Software engineering issues for mobile application development. In: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research, FoSER 2010, pp. 397–400. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882443. ISBN 978-1-4503-0427-6
Xu, R., Saïdi, H., Anderson, R.: Aurasium: practical policy enforcement for android applications. In: Proceedings of the 21st USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, Security 2012, p. 27. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2012). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2362793.2362820
Zadgaonkar, H.: Robotium Automated Testing for Android. Packt Publishing, Birmingham (2013). ISBN 178216801X, 9781782168010
Zheng, L., Chong, S., Myers, A.C., Zdancewic, S.: Using replication and partitioning to build secure distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2003, p. 236. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2003). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=829515.830549. ISBN 0-7695-1940-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Davidson, D., Rastogi, V., Christodorescu, M., Jha, S. (2018). Enhancing Android Security Through App Splitting. In: Lin, X., Ghorbani, A., Ren, K., Zhu, S., Zhang, A. (eds) Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. SecureComm 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78813-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78813-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78812-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78813-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)