Skip to main content

An Ontology-Based Architecture for an Adaptable Cloud Storage Broker

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing (ESOCC 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Interoperability and easier migration between offered serviced are aims that can be supported by cloud service brokerage in the cloud service ecosystem. We present here a multi-cloud storage broker, implemented as an API. This API allows objects and collections of objects to be stored and retrieved uniformly across a range of cloud-based storage providers. This in turn realizes improved portability and easy migration of software systems between providers and services.

Our multi-cloud storage abstraction is implemented as a Java-based multi-cloud storage API and supports a range of storage providers including GoogleDrive, DropBox, Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services as sample service providers. We focus on the architectural aspects of the broker in this paper. The abstraction provided by the broker is based on a layered ontological framework. While many multi-cloud applications exist, we investigate in more detail the mapping of the layered ontology onto a design pattern-based organisation of the architecture. This software architecture perspective allows us to show how this satisfies important maintainability and extensibility properties for any software system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ried, S.: Cloud Broker – A New Business Model Paradigm. Forrester, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benslimane, D., Dustdar, S., Sheth, A.: Services mashups – the new generation of web applications. Internet Comput. 12(5), 13–15 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, D., Ludvigson, E., Sankar, K., Diamond, S., Morrow, M.: Blueprint for the inter-cloud: protocols and formats for cloud computing interoperability. In: International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buyya, R., Ranjan, R., Calheiros, R.N.: InterCloud: utility-oriented federation of cloud computing environments for scaling of application services. In: Hsu, C.-H., Yang, L.T., Park, J.H., Yeo, S.-S. (eds.) ICA3PP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6081, pp. 13–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13119-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Elango, D.M., Fowley, F., Pahl, C.: Testing and comparing the performance of cloud service providers using a service broker architecture. In: Mann, Z.Á., Stolz, V. (eds.) ESOCC 2017. CCIS, vol. 824, pp. 117–129. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cloud Standards (2017). http://cloud-standards.org/

  7. ETSI Cloud Standards (2017). http://www.etsi.org/newsevents/news/734-2013-12-press-release-report-on-cloudcomputing-standards

  8. Fehling, C., Mietzner, R.: Composite as a service: cloud application structures, provisioning, and management. Info. Technol. 53(4), 188–194 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P., Weyns, D.: Cloud architecture continuity: change models and change rules for sustainable cloud software architectures. J. Softw. Evol. Process 29, e1849 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P., Zimmermann, O.: Architectural principles for cloud software. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (2018, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Forrester Research: Cloud Brokers Will Reshape The Cloud (2012). http://www.cordys.com/ufc/file2/cordyscmssites/download/09b57cd3eb6474f1fda1cfd62ddf094d/pu/

  12. Fowley, F., Pahl, C., Zhang, L.: A comparison framework and review of service brokerage solutions for cloud architectures. In: Lomuscio, A.R., Nepal, S., Patrizi, F., Benatallah, B., Brandić, I. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8377, pp. 137–149. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06859-6_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fowley, F., Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P., Fang, D., Liu, X.: A classification and comparison framework for cloud service brokerage architectures. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2016.2537333. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7423741/

  14. Javed, M., Abgaz, Y.M., Pahl, C.: Ontology change management and identification of change patterns. J. Data Semant. 2(2–3), 119–143 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Gomez, S., et al.: Challenges for the comprehensive management of cloud services in a PaaS framework. Scalable Comput. Pract. Exp. 13(3), 201–214 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elango, D.M., Fowley, F., Pahl, C.: Using a cloud broker API to evaluate cloud service provider performance. Research report 471, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, pp. 63–74 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gartner: Cloud Services Brokerage. Gartner Research (2013). http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/cloud-servicesbrokerage-csb

  18. Grozev, N., Buyya, R.: InterCloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey. Softw. Pract. Exp. 44, 369–390 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P.: Microservices: a systematic mapping study. In: Proceedings CLOSER Conference, pp. 137–146 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Taibi, D., Lenarduzzi, V., Pahl, C.: Processes, motivations and issues for migrating to microservices architectures: an empirical investigation. IEEE Cloud Comput. 4(5), 22–32 (2018). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8125558/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hofer, C.N., Karagiannis, G.: Cloud computing services: taxonomy and comparison. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2(2), 81–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jamshidi, P., Sharifloo, A., Pahl, C., Arabnejad, H., Metzger, A., Estrada, G.: Fuzzy self-learning controllers for elasticity management in dynamic cloud architectures. In: 12th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures QoSA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arabnejad, H., Jamshidi, P., Estrada, G., El Ioini, N., Pahl, C.: An auto-scaling cloud controller using fuzzy Q-learning - implementation in openstack. In: Aiello, M., Johnsen, E.B., Dustdar, S., Georgievski, I. (eds.) ESOCC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9846, pp. 152–167. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44482-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Gacitua-Decar, V., Pahl, C.: Structural process pattern matching based on graph morphism detection. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 27(2), 153–189 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. IEEE Cloud Standards (2015). http://cloudcomputing.ieee.org/standards

  26. Jamshidi, P., Ahmad, A., Pahl, C.: Cloud migration research: a systematic review. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 1, 142–157 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. jclouds: jclouds Java and Clojure Cloud API (2015). http://www.jclouds.org/

  28. Ferrer, A.J., et al.: OPTIMIS: a holistic approach to cloud service provisioning. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28(1), 66–77 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Konstantinou, A.V., Eilam, T., Kalantar, M., Totok, A.A., Arnold, W., Sniblel, E.: An architecture for virtual solution composition and deployment in infrastructure clouds. In: International Workshop on Virtualization Technologies in Distributed Computing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pahl, C.: Layered ontological modelling for web service-oriented model-driven architecture. In: Hartman, A., Kreische, D. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3748, pp. 88–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11581741_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Pahl, C., Giesecke, S., Hasselbring, W.: Ontology-based modelling of architectural styles. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(12), 1739–1749 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mietzner, R., Leymann, F., Papazoglou, M.: Defining composite configurable SaaS application packages using SCA Variability Descriptors and Multi-tenancy Patterns. In: International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pahl, C., Xiong, H.: Migration to PaaS clouds - migration process and architectural concerns. In: IEEE 7th International Symposium on the Maintenance and Evolution of Service-Oriented and Cloud-Based Systems MESOCA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pahl, C., Xiong, H., Walshe, R.: A comparison of on-premise to cloud migration approaches. In: Lau, K.-K., Lamersdorf, W., Pimentel, E. (eds.) ESOCC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8135, pp. 212–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40651-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Papazoglou, M.P., van den Heuvel, W.J.: Blueprinting the cloud. IEEE Internet Comput. 15, 74–79 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Petcu, D., et al.: Portable cloud applications–from theory to practice. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(6), 1417–1430 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) Cloud Storage AWS https://aws.amazon.com/s3/

  38. Dropbox. https://www.dropbox.com/

  39. Azure Storage - Secure cloud storage. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/

  40. Google Drive - Cloud Storage & File Backup. https://www.google.com/drive/

  41. Jamshidi, P., Pahl, C., Mendonca, N.C.: Pattern-based multi-cloud architecture migration. Softw. Pract. Exp. 47(9), 1159–1184 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pahl, C., Brogi, A., Soldani, J., Jamshidi, P.: Cloud container technologies: a state-of-the-art review. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2017.2702586. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7922500/

  43. Aderaldo, C.M., Mendonca, N.C., Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P.: Benchmark requirements for microservices architecture research. In: 1st International Workshop on Establishing the Community-Wide Infrastructure for Architecture-Based Software Engineering. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heinrich, R., van Hoorn, A., Knoche, H., Li, F., Lwakatare, L.E., Pahl, C., Schulte, S., Wettinger, J.: Performance engineering for microservices: research challenges and directions. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/SPEC on International Conference on Performance Engineering Companion (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by IC4 (Irish Centre for Cloud Computing and Commerce), funded by EI and the IDA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claus Pahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Elango, D.M., Fowley, F., Pahl, C. (2018). An Ontology-Based Architecture for an Adaptable Cloud Storage Broker. In: Mann, Z., Stolz, V. (eds) Advances in Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing. ESOCC 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79090-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79090-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79089-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79090-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics