Skip to main content

Closure Under Reversal of Languages over Infinite Alphabets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Science – Theory and Applications (CSR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10846))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is shown that languages definable by weak pebble automata are not closed under reversal. For the proof, we establish a kind of periodicity of an automaton’s computation over a specific set of words. The periodicity is partly due to the finiteness of the automaton description and partly due to the word’s structure. Using such a periodicity we can find a word such that during the automaton’s run on it there are two different, yet indistinguishable, configurations. This enables us to remove a part of that word without affecting acceptance. Choosing an appropriate language leads us to the desired result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The proof of the general case can be found in [7], and, hopefully, will also appear elsewhere.

  2. 2.

    It has been shown in [8] that alternating non-deterministic and deterministic one-way wPA have the same expressive power.

  3. 3.

    We omit the subscript \({\varvec{w}}\) of \(\vdash \), if it is clear from the context.

  4. 4.

    That is, pebble \(i + 1\) is placed at the position of pebble i, whereas in the strong PA model this pebble is placed at the beginning of the input word, i.e., at the leftmost position.

  5. 5.

    By definition, \(P_1 = \emptyset \) and, therefore, is redundant.

  6. 6.

    Note that in [7] the pebbles are placed in the reversed order, i.e., the computation start with pebble k and pebble i is placed after pebble \(i + 1\), \(i = 1,\ldots , k - 1\).

  7. 7.

    Recall that we identify \(\theta \) with the tuple of its values and, by the observation in the previous section, we omit the P-component of transitions.

  8. 8.

    As usual, \(\equiv _{\ell _2}\) is the congruence modulo \(l_2\).

  9. 9.

    The automaton enters configurations \([1,t,(p_1^\prime )]\) and \([1,t,(p_1^{\prime \prime })]\) after pebble 2 falls down from the right end of the input entering state t.

  10. 10.

    Thus, both \({\varvec{u}}^\prime {\varvec{u}}^{\prime \prime } {\varvec{v}}\ \mathrm{and}\ {\varvec{x}}\) are in \(L_{{{\texttt {diff}}}}\) and \([ {\varvec{u}}^\prime {\varvec{u}}^{\prime \prime } {\varvec{v}}] = [ {\varvec{x}}].\)

References

  1. Genkin, D., Kaminski, M., Peterfreund, L.: A note on the emptiness problem for alternating finite-memory automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 526, 97–107 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaminski, M., Francez, N.: Finite-memory automata. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 683–688. IEEE Computer Society Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaminski, M., Francez, N.: Finite-memory automata. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 134, 329–363 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaminski, M., Tan, T.: A note on two-pebble automata over infinite alphabets. Fundam. Inform. 98, 1–12 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Neven, F., Schwentick, T., Vianu, V.: Towards regular languages over infinite alphabets. In: Sgall, J., Pultr, A., Kolman, P. (eds.) MFCS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2136, pp. 560–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44683-4_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Neven, F., Schwentick, T., Vianu, V.: Finite state machines for strings over infinite alphabets. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 5, 403–435 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterfreund, L.: Closure under reversal of languages over infinite alphabets: a case study. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology (2015). http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/users/wwwb/cgi-bin/tr-get.cgi/2015/MSC/MSC-2015-20

  8. Tan, T.: On pebble automata for data languages with decidable emptiness problem. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 76, 778–791 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kaminski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Genkin, D., Kaminski, M., Peterfreund, L. (2018). Closure Under Reversal of Languages over Infinite Alphabets. In: Fomin, F., Podolskii, V. (eds) Computer Science – Theory and Applications. CSR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10846. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90530-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90530-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90529-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90530-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics