Skip to main content

On Asymmetric Problems of Objects’ Comparison

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10842))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the paper, we describe selected problems which appear during the process of comparison of the objects. The direction of objects’ comparison seems to have essential role because such comparison may not be symmetric. Thus, we can say that two objects may be viewed as an attempt to determine the degree to which they are similar or different. Asymmetric phenomena of comparing such objects is emphasized and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beals, R., Krantz, D.H., Tversky, A.: The foundations of multidimensional scaling. Psychol. Rev. 75, 127–142 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein, P.L.: Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. Wiley, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi, S., Cha, S., Tappert, C.C.: A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Syst. Cybern. Inform. 8(1), 43–48 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cross, V.V., Sudkamp, T.A.: Similarity and Compatibility in Fuzzy Set Theory. Physica, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1793-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Garner, W.R., Haun, F.: Letter identification as a function of type of perceptual limitation and type of attribute. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 4(2), 199–209 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman, N.: Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman, N. (ed.) Problems and Projects, pp. 437–450. Bobs-Merril, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgetts, C.J., Hahn, U., Chater, N.: Transformation and alignment in similarity. Cognition 113, 62–79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodgetts, C.J., Hahn, U.: Similarity-based asymmetries in perceptual matching. Acta Psychol. 139(2), 291–299 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: On asymmetric matching between sets. Inf. Sci. 312, 89–103 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: Multiset approach to compare qualitative data. In: Proceedings 6th World Conference on Soft Computing, Berkeley, pp. 264–269 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kacprzyk, J., Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: On bilateral matching between fuzzy set. Inf. Sci. 402, 244–266 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: Geometrical interpretation of impact of one set on another set. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10245, pp. 253–262. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59063-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G.: Bidirectional comparison of multi-attribute qualitative objects. Inf. Sci. 436–437, 367–387 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10, 707–710 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanca, M., Grossberg, S., Pinna, B.: Probing perceptual antinomies with the watercolor illusion and explaining how the brain resolves them (PDF). Seeing Perceiving 23, 295–333 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84(4), 327–352 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tversky, A.: Preference, Belief, and Similarity. Selected Writings by Amos Tversky. Edited by Eldar Shafir. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tversky, A., Gati, I.: Studies of similarity. In: Rosch, E., Lloyd, B. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization, vol. 1, pp. 79–98. Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej Krawczak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krawczak, M., Szkatuła, G. (2018). On Asymmetric Problems of Objects’ Comparison. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10842. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91262-2_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91262-2_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91261-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91262-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics