Skip to main content

Evaluating Adaptive Pedagogical Agents’ Prompting Strategies Effect on Students’ Emotions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10858))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3006 Accesses

Abstract

Adapting ITSs that promote the use of metacognitive strategies can sometimes lead to intense prompting, at least initially, to the point that there is a risk of it feeling counterproductive. In this paper, we examine the impact of different prompting strategies on self-reported agent-directed emotions in an ITS that scaffolds students’ use of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies, taking into account students’ prior knowledge. Results indicate that more intense initial prompting can indeed lead to increased frustration, and sometimes boredom even toward pedagogical agents that are perceived as competent. When considering prior knowledge, results also show that this strategy induces a significantly different higher level of confusion in low prior knowledge students when compared to high prior knowledge students. This result is consistent with the fact that higher prior knowledge students tend to be better at self-regulating their learning, and it could also indicate that some low prior knowledge students may be on their path to a better understanding of the value of SRL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We selected only items among the 25 questions that were relative to the subgoals each participant set at the beginning of their learning session (as participants did not have time to explore all the learning material relative to each of the 7 subgoals available).

References

  1. Ma, W., Adesope, O.O., Nesbit, J.C., Liu, Q.: Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 106, 901–918 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bannert, M., Mengelkamp, C.: Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 171–186. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A.F.: New frontiers: regulating learning in CSCL. Educ. Psychol. 48, 25–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouchet, F., Harley, J.M., Azevedo, R.: Can adaptive pedagogical agents’ prompting strategies improve students’ learning and self-regulation? In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9684, pp. 368–374. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Pekrun, R., Perry, R.P.: Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In: Pekrun, R., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (eds.) International Handbook of Emotions in Education, pp. 120–141. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F., Khosravifar, B.: Can the use of cognitive and metacognitive self-regulated learning strategies be predicted by learners’ levels of prior knowledge in hypermedia-learning environments? Comput. Hum. Behav. 39, 356–367 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 153–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37, 91–105 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harley, J.M., Bouchet, F., Azevedo, R.: Examining how students’ typical studying emotions relate to those experienced while studying with an ITS. In: 14th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer International Publishing, Montreal (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jarrell, A., Harley, J.M., Lajoie, S., Naismith, L.: Success, failure and emotions: examining the relationship between performance feedback and emotions in diagnostic reasoning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65, 1263–1284 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boekaerts, M.: The on-line motivation questionnaire: a self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity. In: Pintrich, P.R., Maehr, M.M. (eds.) New Directions in Measures and Methods, pp. 77–120. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacovina, M.E., Tanner Jackson, G., Snow, E.L., McNamara, D.S.: Timing game-based practice in a reading comprehension strategy tutor. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9684, pp. 59–68. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lajoie, S.P., Naismith, L., Poitras, E., Hong, Y.-J., Cruz-Panesso, I., Ranellucci, J., Mamane, S., Wiseman, J.: Technology-rich tools to support self-regulated learning and performance in medicine. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 229–242. Springer, New York, New York, NY (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Littlewort, G., Whitehill, J., Wu, T., Fasel, I., Frank, M., Movellan, J., Bartlett, M.: The computer expression recognition toolbox (CERT). Face Gesture 2011, 298–305 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harley, J.M., Bouchet, F., Hussain, M.S., Azevedo, R., Calvo, R.A.: A multi-componential analysis of emotions during complex learning with an intelligent multi-agent system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 615–625 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.: Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 20, 147–187 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harley, J.M., Carter, C.K., Papaioannou, N., Bouchet, F., Landis, R.S., Azevedo, R., Karabachian, L.: Examining the predictive relationship between personality and emotion traits and students’ agent-directed emotions: towards emotionally-adaptive agent-based learning environments. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 26, 177–219 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bouchet, F., Kinnebrew, J.S., Biswas, G., Azevedo, R.: Identifying students’ characteristic learning behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system fostering self-regulated learning. In: Yacef, K., Zaïane, O., Hershkovitz, A., Yudelson, M., Stamper, J. (eds.) Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Chania, Greece, pp. 65–72 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mudrick, N., Rowe, J.P., Taub, M., Lester, J.C., Azevedo, R.: Toward affect-sensitive virtual human tutors: the influence of facial expressions on learning and emotion. In: Busso, C., Epps, J. (eds.) Proceedings of 2017 7th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), pp. 184–189. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harley, J.M., Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F.: “Let’s set up some subgoals”: understanding human-pedagogical agent collaborations and their implications for learning and prompt and feedback compliance. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 11, 54–66 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harley, J.M., Lajoie, S.P., Frasson, C., Hall, N.C.: Developing emotion-aware, advanced learning technologies: a taxonomy of approaches and features. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27, 268–297 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research supported by funding from NSF (DRL 1008282, DRL1431552, DRL 1660878), SSHRC, and CRC program awarded to third author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Bouchet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bouchet, F., Harley, J.M., Azevedo, R. (2018). Evaluating Adaptive Pedagogical Agents’ Prompting Strategies Effect on Students’ Emotions. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91463-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91464-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics