Skip to main content

Socially-Aware Recommendation for Over-Constrained Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10868))

  • 3054 Accesses

Abstract

Group recommender systems support the identification of items that best fit the individual preferences of all group members. A group recommendation can be determined on the basis of aggregation functions. However, to some extent it is still unclear which aggregation function is most suitable for predicting an item to a group. In this paper, we analyze different preference aggregation functions with regard to their prediction quality. We found out that consensus-based aggregation functions (e.g., Average, Minimal Group Distance, Multiplicative, Ensemble Voting) which consider all group members’ preferences lead to a better prediction quality compared to borderline aggregation functions, such as Least Misery and Most Pleasure which solely focus on preferences of some individual group members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The work presented in this paper has been partially conducted within the scope of the research projects WeWant (basic research project funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency) and OpenReq (Horizon 2020 project funded by the European Union).

  2. 2.

    This approach follows group synthesis approaches as introduced in [2].

  3. 3.

    Graz University of Technology (www.tugraz.at) and Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt (www.aau.at).

  4. 4.

    All the products from the product catalog were manually collected from www.nikonusa.com and www.nikon.de.

  5. 5.

    The precision of each aggregation function is not high, because these are the average precisions calculated for all different combinations of weight sequences and group sizes (we varied 210 different weight sequences and six different group sizes).

References

  1. Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., Torasso, P.: Intrigue: personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and hand held devices. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17(8–9), 687–714 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltrunas, L., Makcinskas, T., Ricci, F.: Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2010, pp. 119–126, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Felfernig, A., Ninaus, G., Grabner, H., Reinfrank, F., Weninger, L., Pagano, D., Maalej, W.: An overview of recommender systems in requirements engineering. In: Maalej, W., Thurimella, A. (eds.) Managing Requirements Knowledge, pp. 315–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34419-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Felfernig, A., Atas, M., Tran, T.N.T., Stettinger, M., Erdeniz, S.P., Leitner, G.: An analysis of group recommendation heuristics for high- and low-involvement items. In: Benferhat, S., Tabia, K., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10350, pp. 335–344. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60042-0_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jameson, A.: More than the sum of its members: challenges for group recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2004, pp. 48–54, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G.: Recommender Systems: An Introduction, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Masthoff, J.: Group modeling: selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 14(1), 37–85 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: combining individual models. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702. Springer, Boston (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy, K., Salamó, M., Coyle, L., McGinty, L., Smyth, B., Nixon, P.: Group recommender systems: a critiquing based approach. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2006, pp. 267–269, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor, M., Cosley, D., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Polylens: a recommender system for groups of users. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW 2001, pp. 199–218, Norwell, MA, USA. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stettinger, M., Felfernig, A., Leitner, G., Reiterer, S., Jeran, M.: Counteracting serial position effects in the choicla group decision support environment. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2015, pp. 148–157, New York, NY, USA. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muesluem Atas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Atas, M., Tran, T.N.T., Felfernig, A., Samer, R. (2018). Socially-Aware Recommendation for Over-Constrained Problems. In: Mouhoub, M., Sadaoui, S., Ait Mohamed, O., Ali, M. (eds) Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10868. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92058-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92058-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92057-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92058-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics