Abstract
Psychology research reports that people tend to seek companionship with those who have a similar level of extraversion, and markers in dialogueshow the speaker’s extraversion. Work in human-computer interaction seeks to understand creating and maintaining rapport between humans and ECAs. This study examines if humans will report greater rapport when interacting with an agent with an extraversion/introversion profile similar to their own. ECAs representing an extrovert and an introvert were created by manipulating three dialogue features. Using an informal, task-oriented setting, participants interacted with one of the agents in an immersive environment. Results suggest that subjects did not report the greatest rapport when interacting with the agent most similar to their level of extraversion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bickmore T, Cassell J (2005) Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In: Advances in natural multimodal dialogue systems. Springer, Netherlands, pp 23–54
Cassell J (2000) Embodied conversational agents. MIT press
Cassell J, Bickmore T (2003) Negotiated collusion: modeling social language and its relationship effects in intelligent agents. User Model User-Adap Inter 13(1–2):89–132
Chen Y, Naveed A, Porzel R (2010) Behavior and preference in minimal personality: a study on embodied conversational agents. In: International conference on multimodal interfaces and the workshop on machine learning for multimodal interaction. ACM
Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ, Barrett P (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality Individ Differ 6(1):21–29
Gill A, Oberlander J (2002) Taking care of the linguistic features of extraversion. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the cognitive science society
Gremler DD, Gwinner KP (2000) Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. J Serv Res 3(1):82–104
Gris I (2015) Two-way virtual rapport in embodied conversational agents. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at El Paso
Heylighen F, Dewaele J-M (2002) Variation in the contextuality of language: an empirical measure. Found Sci 7(3):293–340
Mairesse F et al (2007) Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. J Artif Intell Res 30:457–500
Mairesse F et al (2007) PERSONAGE: personality generation for dialogue. Annu Meet Assoc Comput Linguist 45:496–503
Myers I, Myers P (2010) Understanding personality type. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Gifts differing
Nass C et al (1995) Can computer personalities be human personalities? In: Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. ACM
Novick D, Iván G (2014) Building rapport between human and ECA: A pilot study. In: International conference on human-computer interaction. Springer International Publishing
Scherer KR (1979) Personality markers in speech. Cambridge University Press
Scherer KR (1981) Speech and emotional states. Speech Eval Psychiatry:189–220
Van den Bosch K et al (2012) Characters with personality!. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Wilson JH, Ryan RG, Pugh JL (2010) Professor-student rapport scale predicts student outcomes. Teach Psychol 37(4):246–251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brixey, J., Novick, D. (2019). Building Rapport with Extraverted and Introverted Agents. In: Eskenazi, M., Devillers, L., Mariani, J. (eds) Advanced Social Interaction with Agents . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 510. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92107-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92108-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)