Skip to main content

Congruent Visuo-Tactile Feedback Facilitates the Extension of Peripersonal Space

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications (EuroHaptics 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10894))

Abstract

Effective tool use relies on the integration of multisensory signals related to one’s body and the tool. It has been shown that active tool use results in an extension of peripersonal space, i.e., the space directly surrounding the human body. In the present studies we investigated whether the mere observation of a virtual tool that could be manipulated via a haptic robotic interface would also affect the perception of peripersonal space. Participants passively observed a tool being used (Study 1) and received simple visuotactile feedback related to the tool (Study 2). We assessed the extension of peripersonal space by using the crossmodal congruency task, which measures the interference of observed visual distractors presented at the tool on judgments about tactile stimuli presented to the fingers. We found that passive observation of tool use resulted in a crossmodal congruency effect for both crossed and uncrossed arm/tool use postures (Study 1). This effect was even more pronounced when participants were presented with simple visuo-tactile feedback during the observation phase (Study 2). These findings suggest that additional visuotactile feedback enhances the integration of the tools into the body schema. We discuss the relevance of these findings for the development of surgical robotics, virtual tool use and for motor rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carpenter, W.B.: Royal Institution of Great Britain (1852)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Botvinick, M., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes, N.P.: Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 218, 273 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maravita, A., Iriki, A.: Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn. Sci 8, 79 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., Iwamura, Y.: Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport 7, 2325 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holmes, N.P., Sanabria, D., Calvert, G.A., Spence, C.: Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex 43, 469 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., Driver, J.: Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83, B25 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohil, C.J., Alicea, B., Biocca, F.A.: Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 752 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saposnik, G., Levin, M.: Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke Journal Cerebral Circulation 42, 1380 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Sinigaglia, C., Gallese, V.: Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand. Neuropsychologia 49, 2658 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shore, D.I., Barnes, M.E., Spence, C.: Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neurosci. Lett. 392, 96 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Johansson, B.B.: Multisensory stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 60 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Rizzolatti, G.: Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119(Pt 2), 593 (996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hari, R., et al.: Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 15061, 8 December 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kilner, J.M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S.J., Sirigu, A.: Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1299 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. James, J.M., Kilner, M., Jennifer, J.L., Marchant, L., Frith, C.D.: Relationship between activity in human primary motor cortex during action observation and the mirror neuron system. PloS one 4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heyes, C.: Where do mirror neurons come from? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 575 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ertelt, D., et al.: Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. NeuroImage 36(Suppl. 2), T164 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Celnik, P., Webster, B., Glasser, D.M., Cohen, L.G.: Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 39, 1814 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beck, L., et al.: Evaluation of spatial processing in virtual reality using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Network. 13, 211 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sengül, A., van Elk, M., Rognini, G., Aspell, J.E., Bleuler, H., Blanke, O.: Extending the body to virtual tools using a robotic surgical interface: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. PloS one (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sengül, A., Rognini, G., van Elk, M., Aspell, J.E., Bleuler, H., Blanke, O.: Force feedback facilitates multisensory integration during robotic tool use. Exp. Brain Res. 227, 497–507 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sengül, A.: Cognitive neuroscience based design guidelines for surgical robotics, EPFL Ph.D. thesis No. 5669 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Sengül .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sengül, A., van Elk, M., Blanke, O., Bleuler, H. (2018). Congruent Visuo-Tactile Feedback Facilitates the Extension of Peripersonal Space. In: Prattichizzo, D., Shinoda, H., Tan, H., Ruffaldi, E., Frisoli, A. (eds) Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10894. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93399-3_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93399-3_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93398-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93399-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics