Skip to main content

A Survey of Automated Root Cause Analysis of Software Vulnerability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS 2018)

Abstract

In recent years, many researches on automatic exploit generation and automatic patch techniques have been published. Typically, in the CGC (Cyber Grand Challenge) competition hosted by DARPA, a hacking competition was held between machines to find vulnerabilities, automatically generate exploits and automatically patch them. In the CGC competition, they implemented themselves to work on their own platform, allowing only 7 system calls. However, in a real environment, there are much more system calls and the software works on complicated architecture. In order to effectively apply the vulnerability detection and patching process to the actual real environment, it is necessary to identify the point causing the vulnerability. In this paper, we introduce a method to analyze root cause of vulnerabilities divided into three parts, fault localization, code pattern similarity analysis, and taint analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. U.S. National Vulnerability Database. http://cve.mitre.org/cve/

  2. zzuf - Caca Labs. http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/zzuf

  3. Peach Fuzzer. https://www.peach.tech/

  4. Sulley. https://github.com/OpenRCE/sulley

  5. Aitel, D.: An introduction to SPIKE, the fuzzer creation kit. In: BlackHat USA Conference (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bekrar, S., Bekrar, C., Groz, R., Mounier, L.: A taint based approach for smart fuzzing. In: IEEE Fifth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, pp. 818–825 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Godefroid, P., Levin, M.Y., Molnar, D.A.: Automated whitebox fuzz testing. In: NDSS, vol. 8, pp. 151–166 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cadar, C., Dunbar, D., Engler, D.R.: KLEE: unassisted and automatic generation of high-coverage tests for complex systems programs. In: OSDI, vol. 8, pp. 209–224 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ciortea, L., Zamfir, C., Bucur, S., Chipounov, V., Candea, G.: Cloud9: a software testing service. ACM SIGOPS Operating Syst. Rev., 5–10 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. James, A., Mary, J.: Empirical evaluation of the tarantula automatic fault-localization technique. In: ASE Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 273–282 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liblit, B., Mayur, N., Alice X.Z., Alex, A., Micheal, I.J.: Scalable statistical bug isolation. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI 2005, pp. 15–26 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chao, L., Long, F., Xifeng, Y., Jiawei, H., Samuel, P.M.: Statistical debugging: a hypothesis testing-based approach. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 32(10), 831–848 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, L., Lina, W., Zouting, X., Dongming, G.: Execution-aware fault localization based on the control flow analysis. In: Information Computing and Applications, ICICA, pp. 158–165 (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Seulbae, K., Seunghoon, W., Heejo, L., Hakjoo, O.: VUDDY: a scalable approach for vulnerable code clone discovery. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 595–614 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pewny, J., Garmany, B., Gawlik, R., Rossow, C., Holz, T.: Cross-architecture bug search in binary executables. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 709–724 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feng, Q., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Zhou, R., Henderson, A., Yin, H.: Extracting conditional formulas for cross-platform bug search. In: ASIA CCS 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. MinGyung, K., Stephen, M.C., Pongsin, P., Dawn, S.: DTA++: dynamic taint analysis with targeted control-flow propagation. In: NDSS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. James, C., Wanchun, L., Alessandro, O.: Dytan: a generic dynamic taint analysis framework. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2007, pp. 196–206 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weidong, C., Marcus, P., SangKil, C., Yanick, F., Vasileios, P.K.: RETracer: triaging crashes by reverse execution from partial memory dumps. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2016, pp. 820–831 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2017-0-00184, Self-Learning Cyber Immune Technology Development).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwankuk Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jurn, J., Kim, T., Kim, H. (2019). A Survey of Automated Root Cause Analysis of Software Vulnerability. In: Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Javaid, N., Enokido, T. (eds) Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. IMIS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 773. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93554-6_74

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics