Skip to main content

Conceptual Issues in Mastery Criteria: Differentiating Uncertainty and Degrees of Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10947))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Mastery learning is a common personalization strategy in adaptive educational systems. A mastery criterion decides whether a learner should continue practice of a current topic or move to a more advanced topic. This decision is typically done based on comparison with a mastery threshold. We argue that the commonly used mastery criteria combine two different aspects of knowledge estimate in the comparison to this threshold: the degree of achieved knowledge and the uncertainty of the estimate. We propose a novel learner model that provides conceptually clear treatment of these two aspects. The model is a generalization of the commonly used Bayesian knowledge tracing and logistic models and thus also provides insight into the relationship of these two types of learner models. We compare the proposed mastery criterion to commonly used criteria and discuss consequences for practical development of educational systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beck, J.E., Gong, Y.: Wheel-spinning: students who fail to master a skill. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 431–440. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Conati, C., Gertner, A., Vanlehn, K.: Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 12(4), 371–417 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 4(4), 253–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falakmasir, M., Yudelson, M., Ritter, S., Koedinger, K.: Spectral Bayesian knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining, pp. 360–363 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. González-Brenes, J., Huang, Y., Brusilovsky, P.: General features in knowledge tracing: applications to multiple subskills, temporal item response theory, and expert knowledge. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining, pp. 84–91 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaeser, T., Klingler, S., Schwing, A.G., Gross, M.: Dynamic Bayesian networks for student modeling. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Käser, T., Klingler, S., Gross, M.: When to stop?: Towards universal instructional policies. In: Proceedings of Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 289–298. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khajah, M., Wing, R.M., Lindsey, R.V., Mozer, M.C.: Integrating latent-factor and knowledge-tracing models to predict individual differences in learning. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, C., Sheehan, K.: Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 14(4), 367–386 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavlik, P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis-a new alternative to knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 531–538. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pelánek, R.: Applications of the ELO rating system in adaptive educational systems. Comput. Educ. 98, 169–179 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pelánek, R.: Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: an overview of learner modeling techniques. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 27(3), 313–350 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pelánek, R., Řihák, J.: Experimental analysis of mastery learning criteria. In: Proceedings of User Modelling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 156–163. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pelánek, R., Řihák, J., Papoušek, J.: Impact of data collection on interpretation and evaluation of student model. In: Proceedings of Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 40–47. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ritter, S., Yudelson, M., Fancsali, S.E., Berman, S.R.: How mastery learning works at scale. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Learning@Scale, pp. 71–79. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rollinson, J., Brunskill, E.: From predictive models to instructional policies. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining, pp. 179–186 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Streeter, M.: Mixture modeling of individual learning curves. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining. pp. 45–52 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vos, H.J.: A bayesian procedure in the context of sequential mastery testing. Psicológica 21(1), 191–211 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radek Pelánek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pelánek, R. (2018). Conceptual Issues in Mastery Criteria: Differentiating Uncertainty and Degrees of Knowledge. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93842-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93843-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics